Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem dry weight decreased alongside lower stem carbon 14.

Taxon: SoybeansGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage: steme0
Outcome: stem dry weighte0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The stem component contained significantly less 14 C than the other treatments and was accompanied by a decrease in stem dry weight.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–975

t0
“Carbon‐14 Assimilate Translocation in Nodulated and Nonnodulated Soybeans1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74

Title

Carbon‐14 Assimilate Translocation in Nodulated and Nonnodulated Soybeans¹

W. J. Russell; D. R. Johnson Crop Science 1975. doi:10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183x001500020004x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fungal application decreased soybean stover dry weight by 15.41%.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment: simultaneous application of these two fungie0
Outcome: dry weight of stovere0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 15.41e0
Comparator: without applicatione1

Verbatim

e0
“The simultaneous application of these two fungi resulted in a decrease in dry weight of stover, number of pods, number of grains, grain weight, and weight of 100 soybeans respectively 15.41, 22.50, 30.87, 69.95, and 49.03%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–992

e1
“without application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–350

Title

Fungus Applications on Growth and Yield of Dena-1 Soybean Varieties

Sutarman; Agus Miftahurrohmat; Andriani Eko Prihatiningrum E3S Web of Conferences 2022. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202236104019

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Trichoderma application did not increase Dena-1 soybean growth or production.
Intervention effect Glomus application did not increase Dena-1 soybean growth or production.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean pod number by 22.50%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean grain number by 30.87%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean grain weight by 69.95%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased weight of 100 soybeans by 49.03%.
Mechanism The authors infer resource competition between root nodule bacteria and the two applied fungi.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1975 decline in nonirrigated soybean leaf area ratio was attributed to reduced leaf weight ratio during vegetative growth.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage: vegetative growthe0
Outcome: decline of LARe0
Qualifier: decrease in leaf weight ratioe0

Verbatim

e0
“The decline of LAR of the N soybeans during 1975 was attributed to the decrease in leaf weight ratio during vegetative growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1941–2066

Title

Dry Weight and Leaf Area Production Rates of Irrigated Determinate Soybeans¹

H. D. Scott; J. T. Batchelor Agronomy Journal 1979. doi:10.2134/agronj1979.00021962007100050017x

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fungal application decreased soybean grain weight by 69.95%.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment: simultaneous application of these two fungie0
Outcome: grain weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 69.95e0
Comparator: without applicatione1

Verbatim

e0
“The simultaneous application of these two fungi resulted in a decrease in dry weight of stover, number of pods, number of grains, grain weight, and weight of 100 soybeans respectively 15.41, 22.50, 30.87, 69.95, and 49.03%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–992

e1
“without application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–350

Title

Fungus Applications on Growth and Yield of Dena-1 Soybean Varieties

Sutarman; Agus Miftahurrohmat; Andriani Eko Prihatiningrum E3S Web of Conferences 2022. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202236104019

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Trichoderma application did not increase Dena-1 soybean growth or production.
Intervention effect Glomus application did not increase Dena-1 soybean growth or production.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean stover dry weight by 15.41%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean pod number by 22.50%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean grain number by 30.87%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased weight of 100 soybeans by 49.03%.
Mechanism The authors infer resource competition between root nodule bacteria and the two applied fungi.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fungal application decreased weight of 100 soybeans by 49.03%.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment: simultaneous application of these two fungie0
Outcome: weight of 100 soybeanse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 49.03%e0
Comparator: without applicatione1

Verbatim

e0
“The simultaneous application of these two fungi resulted in a decrease in dry weight of stover, number of pods, number of grains, grain weight, and weight of 100 soybeans respectively 15.41, 22.50, 30.87, 69.95, and 49.03%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–992

e1
“without application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–350

Title

Fungus Applications on Growth and Yield of Dena-1 Soybean Varieties

Sutarman; Agus Miftahurrohmat; Andriani Eko Prihatiningrum E3S Web of Conferences 2022. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202236104019

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Trichoderma application did not increase Dena-1 soybean growth or production.
Intervention effect Glomus application did not increase Dena-1 soybean growth or production.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean stover dry weight by 15.41%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean pod number by 22.50%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean grain number by 30.87%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean grain weight by 69.95%.
Mechanism The authors infer resource competition between root nodule bacteria and the two applied fungi.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1975 decline in nonirrigated soybean leaf area ratio during reproduction was attributed to reduced leaf weight ratio and specific leaf area.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxe1
Organ / stage: reproductive growthe0
Outcome: decline of LARe1
Qualifier: decrease in both LWR and specific leaf areae0

Verbatim

e0
“to the decrease in both LWR and specific leaf area during reproductive growth.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2149

e1
“The decline of LAR of the N soybeans during 1975”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1941–1989

Title

Dry Weight and Leaf Area Production Rates of Irrigated Determinate Soybeans¹

H. D. Scott; J. T. Batchelor Agronomy Journal 1979. doi:10.2134/agronj1979.00021962007100050017x

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fungal application decreased soybean pod number by 22.50%.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment: simultaneous application of these two fungie0
Outcome: number of podse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 22.50e0
Comparator: without applicatione1

Verbatim

e0
“The simultaneous application of these two fungi resulted in a decrease in dry weight of stover, number of pods, number of grains, grain weight, and weight of 100 soybeans respectively 15.41, 22.50, 30.87, 69.95, and 49.03%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–992

e1
“without application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–350

Title

Fungus Applications on Growth and Yield of Dena-1 Soybean Varieties

Sutarman; Agus Miftahurrohmat; Andriani Eko Prihatiningrum E3S Web of Conferences 2022. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202236104019

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Trichoderma application did not increase Dena-1 soybean growth or production.
Intervention effect Glomus application did not increase Dena-1 soybean growth or production.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean stover dry weight by 15.41%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean grain number by 30.87%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean grain weight by 69.95%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased weight of 100 soybeans by 49.03%.
Mechanism The authors infer resource competition between root nodule bacteria and the two applied fungi.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fungal application decreased soybean grain number by 30.87%.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment: simultaneous application of these two fungie0
Outcome: number of grainse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 30.87e0
Comparator: without applicatione1

Verbatim

e0
“The simultaneous application of these two fungi resulted in a decrease in dry weight of stover, number of pods, number of grains, grain weight, and weight of 100 soybeans respectively 15.41, 22.50, 30.87, 69.95, and 49.03%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–992

e1
“without application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–350

Title

Fungus Applications on Growth and Yield of Dena-1 Soybean Varieties

Sutarman; Agus Miftahurrohmat; Andriani Eko Prihatiningrum E3S Web of Conferences 2022. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202236104019

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Trichoderma application did not increase Dena-1 soybean growth or production.
Intervention effect Glomus application did not increase Dena-1 soybean growth or production.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean stover dry weight by 15.41%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean pod number by 22.50%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased soybean grain weight by 69.95%.
Intervention effect Combined fungal application decreased weight of 100 soybeans by 49.03%.
Mechanism The authors infer resource competition between root nodule bacteria and the two applied fungi.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 at 910 μL L-1 slightly decreased the harvest index of soybean relative to ambient CO2.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxe1
Treatment: 910 μL L ‐1 CO 2e2
Outcome: harvest indexe3
Direction: decreasee3
Qualifier: slightlye3
Comparator: ambiente1

Verbatim

e1
“growth of soybeans [ Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Bragg’] grown in pots in open top field chambers at six CO 2 concentrations ranging from 332 μL L ‐1 (ambient) to 910 μL L ‐1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–382

e2
“Major growth response occurred with the first increments of added CO 2 with a maximum 66% increase in total vegetative dry matter at the 910 μL L ‐1 CO 2 level”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–544

e3
“Dry weight increases were proportionate among vegetative plant parts, although the harvest index was found to decrease slightly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–673

Title

Influence of Elevated CO₂ on Growth of Soybean Plants¹

Hugo H. Rogers; Jennifer D. Cure; Judith F. Thomas; et al. Crop Science 1984. doi:10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183x002400020036x

Other claims from this paper (12)

“decrease in dry weight”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics