View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: apple ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under shade, declining soil water potential reduced leaf dry weight by 20%.
Treatmenta decrease in soil water potential e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under shade, a decrease in soil water potential resulted in a 20% decrease in dry weight . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–784 t0 “Apple Tree ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–42 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect At 20°C, 75% shade reduced apple shoot growth and leaf number. Intervention effect At 25°, shading had no effect on apple shoot growth and leaf number. Intervention effect At high soil water potential, 75% shade significantly reduced total leaf area. Intervention effect At low soil water potential, shading had little effect on total leaf area. Intervention effect Under full sun, declining soil water potential reduced total leaf dry weight by 46%. Intervention effect Under full sun, rising temperature decreased total stem dry weight. Intervention effect Under shade, temperature had little effect on stem dry weight. Intervention effect At 75% shade, rising temperature decreased specific leaf weight. Intervention effect In full sun, temperature had no effect on specific leaf weight. Observation Environmental interactions did not influence specific leaf weight of new leaves. Intervention effect Leaf epicuticular wax quantity rose as soil water potential fell. Intervention effect Lower soil water potential increased the proportion of alkanes in leaf wax. Intervention effect Lower soil water potential increased the proportion of wax esters in leaf wax. Intervention effect Alkane content rose as temperature rose. Method / resource Environmental conditions changed photosynthetic functioning and masked prometryn effects, making the herbicide unreliable for measuring foliar absorption. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 1500 nematodes per kg soil, shoot dry weight of M.26 decrease d by 29%.
Treatment1 500 nematodes kg -1 soil density e3 Outcomedry shoot weight e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Pathogenicity of Pratylenchus penetrans to dwarfing apple rootstocks ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 e3 “Under the 1 500 nematodes kg -1 soil density, the dry shoot weight of Bud 9 and M.9 were not significantly different from the 500 nematodes kg -1 soil density except M.26 which exhibited a 29% decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–555 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The Redchief Delicious interstock had an unexplained negative effect on leaf, shoot and new root dry weight .
MaterialRedchief Delicious e2 TreatmentRedchief Delicious e1 Outcomeleaf, shoot and new root dry weight e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “apple seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–97 e1 “The ‘Redchief Delicious’ interstock had an unexplained negative effect on leaf, shoot and new root dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–553 e2 “‘Redchief Delicious’ scions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–119 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced soil water lowered predawn leaf water potential and gas exchange.
Treatmentmoderate reduction of soil water content e0 Outcomepredawn leaf water potential and leaf gas exchange e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The moderate reduction of soil water content induced a decrease in predawn leaf water potential and leaf gas exchange; however, root and above ground dry weight were not affected. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–700 t0 “apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding surfactants to the CaCl2 dip lowered fruit Ca concentration to 230 to 250 ppm compared with the CaCl2 dip alone.
Treatmentsurfactants were added to the CaCl 2 solution e2 OutcomeCa concentration in dipped fruit e2 Directiondecrease inferred e2 Comparatordipped in 4% CaCl 2 (wt/vol) e1 Verbatim
t0 “Calcium Concentration in Apple Fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 e1 “Undipped fruit contained 203 ppm Ca and fruit dipped in 4% CaCl 2 (wt/vol) contained 278 ppm Ca, dry weight basis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–325 e2 “When surfactants were added to the CaCl 2 solution, the Ca concentration in dipped fruit was 230 to 250 ppm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–434 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.