Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Future drought increased wheat water requirements.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: future droughte0
Outcome: water requirementse0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Likewise, future drought extremely increased water requirements”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–841

t0
“buckwheat outperforms wheat response”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–122

Title

Enhanced photosynthesis, transpiration regulation, water use-efficiency and growth in buckwheat outperforms wheat response to high [CO2], high temperature and drought

Xabier Simón Martínez-Goñi; Jon Miranda-Apodaca; Usue Pérez-López Environmental and Experimental Botany 2024. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105756

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect High temperature and high CO2 decreased wheat water potential with higher dehydration.
Intervention effect Future drought reduced wheat photosynthetic rate.
Intervention effect Future drought reduced wheat PSII quantum yield.
Intervention effect Future drought changed wheat antioxidant metabolism.
Observation Buckwheat maintained optimal hydration under high CO2 and temperature with or without drought.
Intervention effect Buckwheat had higher photosynthetic rates under the combined climate conditions.
Intervention effect Buckwheat increased water-use efficiency under the combined climate conditions.
Association Buckwheat growth outperformed wheat growth under future climate conditions.
Mechanism Enhanced stomatal regulation and water-use efficiency were attributed as causes of improved buckwheat response.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-pea intercropping reduced pea yield through competition.

Taxon: peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment: IC-WPe0
Outcome: legumes yieldse0
Direction: reducede0

Verbatim

e0
“The IC-WP and IC-WF showed reduced legumes yields due to competition”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1108

t0
“Rapeseed-pea intercrop outperforms wheat-legume ones”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–52

Title

Rapeseed-pea intercrop outperforms wheat-legume ones in land-use efficiency in Mediterranean conditions

Louise Blanc; Jorge Lampurlanés; Genís Simon-Miquel; et al. Field Crops Research 2024. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109612

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Future drought reduced wheat photosynthetic rate.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: photosynthetic ratee0
Direction: reductionse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“causing extreme reductions in the photosynthetic rate and in the quantum yield of PSII”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–929

t0
“buckwheat outperforms wheat response”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–122

Title

Enhanced photosynthesis, transpiration regulation, water use-efficiency and growth in buckwheat outperforms wheat response to high [CO2], high temperature and drought

Xabier Simón Martínez-Goñi; Jon Miranda-Apodaca; Usue Pérez-López Environmental and Experimental Botany 2024. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105756

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect High temperature and high CO2 decreased wheat water potential with higher dehydration.
Intervention effect Future drought increased wheat water requirements.
Intervention effect Future drought reduced wheat PSII quantum yield.
Intervention effect Future drought changed wheat antioxidant metabolism.
Observation Buckwheat maintained optimal hydration under high CO2 and temperature with or without drought.
Intervention effect Buckwheat had higher photosynthetic rates under the combined climate conditions.
Intervention effect Buckwheat increased water-use efficiency under the combined climate conditions.
Association Buckwheat growth outperformed wheat growth under future climate conditions.
Mechanism Enhanced stomatal regulation and water-use efficiency were attributed as causes of improved buckwheat response.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Future drought reduced wheat PSII quantum yield.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: quantum yield of PSIIe0
Direction: reductionse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“causing extreme reductions in the photosynthetic rate and in the quantum yield of PSII”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–929

t0
“buckwheat outperforms wheat response”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–122

Title

Enhanced photosynthesis, transpiration regulation, water use-efficiency and growth in buckwheat outperforms wheat response to high [CO2], high temperature and drought

Xabier Simón Martínez-Goñi; Jon Miranda-Apodaca; Usue Pérez-López Environmental and Experimental Botany 2024. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105756

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect High temperature and high CO2 decreased wheat water potential with higher dehydration.
Intervention effect Future drought increased wheat water requirements.
Intervention effect Future drought reduced wheat photosynthetic rate.
Intervention effect Future drought changed wheat antioxidant metabolism.
Observation Buckwheat maintained optimal hydration under high CO2 and temperature with or without drought.
Intervention effect Buckwheat had higher photosynthetic rates under the combined climate conditions.
Intervention effect Buckwheat increased water-use efficiency under the combined climate conditions.
Association Buckwheat growth outperformed wheat growth under future climate conditions.
Mechanism Enhanced stomatal regulation and water-use efficiency were attributed as causes of improved buckwheat response.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest stated yield was 0.3 t/ha for winter wheat cv. Declic sown in September.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: cv. Declice0
Treatment: sown in Septembere0
Outcome: Grain yieldse0
Direction: ranged frome0
Value: 0.3 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0
“Grain yields ranged from 0.3 t/ha for a winter wheat (cv. Declic) sown in September to 8 t/ha for a spring wheat (cv. Silverstar) sown in June.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–545

t0
“spring wheat outperforms”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–39

Title

Early-maturing spring wheat outperforms late-maturing winter wheat in the high rainfall environment of south-western Victoria

P. A. Riffkin; P. M. Evans; J. F. Chin; et al. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 2003. doi:10.1071/ar02081

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genomic models had the lowest predictive ability.

Taxon: sugarcanee1
Outcome: predictive abilitye0
Direction: loweste0
Comparator: genomics (M1)e0

Verbatim

e0
“genomics (M1) presented the lowest predictive ability”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1201

e1
“in a sugarcane population (Saccharum spp.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–337

Title

Near-infrared spectroscopy outperforms genomics for predicting sugarcane feedstock quality traits

Mateus Teles Vital Gonçalves; Gota Morota; Paulo Mafra de Almeida Costa; et al. PLoS ONE 2021. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236853

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resource BayesB models predicted traits better than PLS models.
Method / resource NIR models gave the highest prediction accuracy.
Method / resource Combining NIR and genomic predictors did not significantly improve accuracy for either trait.
Recommendation The authors suggest NIR prediction can estimate genetic merit of sugarcane clones effectively.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization delayed wheat development.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome: developmente0
Direction: delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“While nitrogen fertilization delayed development, it significantly increased yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1398

e1
“wheat varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–580

Title

Adapting Wheat Production to Global Warming in West Asia: Facultative Wheat Outperforms Winter and Spring Wheat at Conventional Nitrogen Levels

Afsaneh Yousefi; Alireza Koocheki; Mehdi Nassiri Mahallati; et al. Food and Energy Security 2025. doi:10.1002/fes3.70072

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Autumn sown facultative wheat had a shorter tillering stage than winter wheat.
Observation Autumn sown facultative wheat had a longer early reproductive stage than winter wheat.
Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilization significantly increased wheat yield.
Observation Facultative wheat yielded more grain at conventional nitrogen rates.
Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen fertilization improved wheat grain protein concentration.
Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen fertilization improved wheat grain nutrient concentrations of N, P and K.
Observation Crop modeling indicated winter sown facultative wheat may have greater yield stability.
Observation Crop modeling suggested winter sown facultative wheat could have more consistent phenological development.
Recommendation The authors recommend optimizing sowing dates and nitrogen fertilization to mitigate warming impacts and enhance wheat productivity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced maize grain yield under fertilized conditions in some cropping systems.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: Droughte0
Outcome: maize grain yielde0
Direction: reducede0
Qualifier: under fertilized conditions in some cropping systemse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Drought reduced maize grain yield under fertilized conditions in some cropping systems”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1048

Title

Maize-Pigeonpea Intercropping Outperforms Monocultures Under Drought

Leah L. R. Renwick; Anthony A. Kimaro; Johannes M. Hafner; et al. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2020. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.562663

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-faba bean intercropping reduced legume yield through competition.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: IC-WFe0
Outcome: legumes yieldse0
Direction: reducede0

Verbatim

e0
“The IC-WP and IC-WF showed reduced legumes yields due to competition”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1108

t0
“wheat-legume”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47

Title

Rapeseed-pea intercrop outperforms wheat-legume ones in land-use efficiency in Mediterranean conditions

Louise Blanc; Jorge Lampurlanés; Genís Simon-Miquel; et al. Field Crops Research 2024. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109612

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Wheat-pea intercropping reduced pea yield through competition.
Observation Wheat-pea intercropping did not increase land-use efficiency (LER 0.94).
Observation Wheat-faba bean intercropping did not increase land-use efficiency (LER 0.86).
Observation Rapeseed-pea intercropping increased land-use efficiency to LER 1.43 with high variability.
Observation Rapeseed-pea intercrop overyielded by 9% in one of three years.
Recommendation Rapeseed-pea intercropping warrants further study under Mediterranean conditions.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated drought stressed plants had significantly lower photosynthetic pigments.

Taxon: Kidney BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: drought stresse0
Outcome: photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction: lowere0

Verbatim

e0
“Untreated plants under drought stress had significantly lower photosynthetic pigments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–794

t0
“Kidney Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–79

Title

Nanochelated Iron Outperforms Ionic Iron in Kidney Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Productivity Under Drought Stress

Fatemeh Heidarian; Sina Fallah; Lok R. Pokhrel Journal of soil science and plant nutrition 2026. doi:10.1007/s42729-026-03090-2

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Nanochelated iron increased grain yield under drought by 47%.
Intervention effect Nanochelated iron increased protein content under drought by 21%.
Intervention effect Nanochelated iron increased protein yield under drought by 78%.
Intervention effect Nanochelated iron increased grain iron under drought by 36%.
Intervention effect Under nondrought conditions grain yield increased 27%.
Intervention effect Under nondrought conditions protein content increased 22%.
Intervention effect Under nondrought conditions protein yield increased 55%.
Intervention effect Under nondrought conditions grain Fe concentration increased 31%.
Intervention effect Nanochelated iron produced an extra 7% protein content increase over ionic iron.
Intervention effect Nanochelated iron produced an 8% enhancement in grain Fe concentration over ionic iron.
Mechanism Authors attribute nanochelated iron benefits to reduced oxidative stress and electrolyte leakage and altered proline, carotenoids and water content.

“outperforms”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics