View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Far-red supplementation did not decrease total chlorophyll under high PAR.
Total chlorophyll content e0 not when PAR was high e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Total chlorophyll content decrease d with +FR when PAR was low, but not when PAR was high (i.e., a significant FR*PAR in teraction) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1085 e1 “young olive trees (cv. Arbequina) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–473 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
With recurrent medium drought, prior medium drought did not significantly change photosynthetic parameters.
photosynthetic parameters e0 no significant difference e0 plants only exposed to second medium drought e0 Verbatim
e0 “plants pre-exposed to medium drought showed no significant difference in plant height, biomass, and photosynthetic parameters, but a significant decrease in leaf area, compared to plants only exposed to second medium drought. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1538 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Severe first drought significantly reduced height, leaf area, and shoot and root biomass. Observation Severe first drought significantly reduced transpiration, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2. Observation Severe first drought significantly reduced net and maximum net photosynthetic rates. Observation Severe first drought significantly increased light compensation point and dark respiration. Intervention effect Medium drought significantly reduced height, leaf area and shoot biomass. Observation Root biomass did not vary under medium drought. Observation The root to shoot ratio increased under medium drought. Observation Photosynthetic parameters showed no significant differences under medium drought. Intervention effect After rewatering, photosynthesis and growth rate recovered to well watered levels. Observation After rewatering, height and leaf area remained below control levels. Observation With recurrent medium drought, prior medium drought did not significantly change height or biomass. Observation With recurrent medium drought, prior medium drought significantly decreased leaf area. Observation With recurrent drought, prior severe drought increased transpiration, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2. Observation With recurrent drought, prior severe drought increased net photosynthesis, maximum photosynthesis and apparent quantum yield. Observation With recurrent drought, prior severe drought decreased height, leaf area and biomass. Observation observed original result no effect significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
With recurrent medium drought, prior medium drought did not significantly change height or biomass.
plant height, biomass e0 no significant difference e0 plants only exposed to second medium drought e0 Verbatim
e0 “plants pre-exposed to medium drought showed no significant difference in plant height, biomass, and photosynthetic parameters, but a significant decrease in leaf area, compared to plants only exposed to second medium drought. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1538 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Severe first drought significantly reduced height, leaf area, and shoot and root biomass. Observation Severe first drought significantly reduced transpiration, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2. Observation Severe first drought significantly reduced net and maximum net photosynthetic rates. Observation Severe first drought significantly increased light compensation point and dark respiration. Intervention effect Medium drought significantly reduced height, leaf area and shoot biomass. Observation Root biomass did not vary under medium drought. Observation The root to shoot ratio increased under medium drought. Observation Photosynthetic parameters showed no significant differences under medium drought. Intervention effect After rewatering, photosynthesis and growth rate recovered to well watered levels. Observation After rewatering, height and leaf area remained below control levels. Observation With recurrent medium drought, prior medium drought did not significantly change photosynthetic parameters. Observation With recurrent medium drought, prior medium drought significantly decreased leaf area. Observation With recurrent drought, prior severe drought increased transpiration, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2. Observation With recurrent drought, prior severe drought increased net photosynthesis, maximum photosynthesis and apparent quantum yield. Observation With recurrent drought, prior severe drought decreased height, leaf area and biomass. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Olea europaeae1
Zea mays