View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: maize ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in maize dry weight was comparable with the decrease in plant height and leaf area.
Outcomedecrease in dry weight e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Comparatorplant height and leaf area e1 Verbatim
t0 “Maize(Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 e1 “the decrease in dry weight was comparable with plant height and leaf area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1352 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Root dry weight of chilling-tolerant maize hybrids did not decrease .
Materialmaize hybrids with chilling tolerance e0 Outcomedry weight of root e0 Directiondidn't decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The results show that the dry weight of root of maize hybrids with chilling tolerance didn't decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–469 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight .
Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Outcomegrowth (fresh weight and dry weight) e0 Directionneither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Transpiration decrease from FASW 1 under water deficits did not affect maize dry weight until FASW 0.75.
Treatmentwater deficits e1 Directiondid not affect e1 Qualifieruntil FASW = 0.75 e1 Verbatim
t0 “Maize(Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 e1 “the decrease of transpiration from FASW = 1 in response to water deficits did not affect dry weight until FASW = 0.75 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1260 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize ash content.
Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Directionneither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
XET activity per unit fresh weight did not decrease in the zone of wall tightening after osmotic stress.
Qualifiernot per unit fresh weight e2 Verbatim
e1 “A series of physical and chemical analyses were made on the expanding zone of maize seedling roots grown in hydroponics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 e2 “In the zone of wall tightening following osmotic stress, XET activity was decrease d per unit dry weight (compared with the unstressed control), but not per unit fresh weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1842 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter or leaf area index of maize.
TreatmentIrrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) e0 Outcomechlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI) e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 SettingMiddle Delta Conditions of Egypt t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103 e0 “Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease kernels per row, 100-kernel weight or grain yield of maize.
TreatmentIrrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) e0 Outcomekernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 SettingMiddle Delta Conditions of Egypt t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103 e0 “Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The upper shoot also showed no decrease in growth or ash content under high humidity.
Organ / stageupper part of the shoot e0 Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Outcomeupper part of the shoot e0 Directionneither a decrease e2 Verbatim
e0 “This was also found when the upper part of the shoot (70–150 cm) was tested separately ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–575 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease ear length, ear diameter or rows per ear of maize.
TreatmentIrrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) e0 Outcomeear length, ear diameter, rows per ear e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 SettingMiddle Delta Conditions of Egypt t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103 e0 “Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.