View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pests and diseases were controlled as efficiently in the third conversion year as under conventional farming.
Treatmentthird year of conversion e0 e1 Outcomepests and diseases were controlled e0 e1 Directionsimilar efficiency levels e0 e1 Comparatorconventional farming e0 e1 Verbatim
e0 “pests and diseases were controlled in the third year of conversion at similar efficiency levels as in conventional farming. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–991 e1 “grapevine phytosanitary management ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–634 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
An equal-weight tobacco dust and hydrated lime mixture controlled aphids as efficiently as less diluted mixtures.
TreatmentTobacco dust mixed with hydrated lime in equal proportions by weight e0 Comparatorless diluted mixtures e0 Verbatim
e0 “Tobacco dust mixed with hydrated lime in equal proportions by weight has resulted in as efficient control as less diluted mixtures. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1469 t0 “The Control of Aphids, Which Infest Cauliflower. Seed Beds on Long Island, By Means of Tobacco Dust Mixtures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate did not effectively control I. grandifolia .
Outcomenot I. grandifolia e0 Verbatim
e0 “glyphosate efficiently controlled U. decumbens but not I. grandifolia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–663 t0 “Coffea arabica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–72 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Isotianil treatment caused no phytotoxicity on wheat plants.
Treatmentisotianil treatment e1 Verbatim
e1 “No phytotoxicity from isotianil treatment was observed on wheat plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1321 t0 “Wheat blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae pathovar Triticum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The 10% CO2/11% O2 atmosphere did not significantly modify consumer acceptance.
Treatment10% CO2/11% O2 e0 Outcomeconsumer acceptance e0 Directionwithout significantly modifying e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the 10% CO2/11% O2 combination can efficiently prolong the shelf life of wild strawberries by maintaining the quality parameters within acceptable values, through inhibiting the development of Botrytis cinerea , without significantly modifying consumer acceptance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–755 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The wild tomato extract oil dispersion caused no phytotoxicity
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e1 “In in vitro testing, it efficiently controlled aphids with 90.5% mortalities and 68.7-71.2% under field-conditions without producing phytotoxicity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1027 t0 “Phytochemicals from Wild Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–138 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
VitC pretreatment of sugarcane explants did not affect their growth.
Treatmentpretreatment of the explants with VitC( 0. 75 g·L- 1) e1 Outcomegrowth of the explants e2 Directiondid not give impacts e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Control of Browning in Tissue Culture of Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 e1 “the pretreatment of the explants with VitC( 0. 75 g·L- 1) controlled browning of sugarcane efficiently ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–689 e2 “did not give impacts on the growth of the explants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–744 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Penoxsulam plus Butachlor performed on par with twice hand weeding.
TreatmentPenoxsulam 0.97% + Butachlor 38.7% e1 Comparatorhand weeding twice on 20 and 40 DAT e0 Verbatim
e0 “It was at are par with hand weeding twice on 20 and 40 DAT. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1488 t0 “rice ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–92 e1 “pre-emergence application of Penoxsulam 0.97% + Butachlor 38.7% was efficiently controlled ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1310 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.