Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Precipitation did not significantly affect model fits.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Precipitatione0
Outcome
fitse0
Direction
not found to significantly affecte0

Verbatim

e0

“Precipitation was not found to significantly affect the fits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–337
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29

Title

Development of a winter wheat adjustable crop calendar model

John Baker NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)

Other claims from this paper (3)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slopes of Lucas fits did not differ between primary and regrowth grass and red clover silages.

Taxon
grass and red clovere4
Outcome
slopes in Lucas fitse4
Direction
did not differe4

Verbatim

e4

“The slopes in Lucas fits of primary and regrowth grass and red clover silages did not differ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–595

Title

Indigestible neutral detergent fibre in predictions of grass and red clover silage digestibility

S. J. Krizsan; H. Mirzaei Alamouti; M. Rinne; et al. Grass and Forage Science 2013. doi:10.1111/gfs.12029

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Linear fits of predicted against measured values showed no significant difference among the three N approaches.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
linear fits of the predicted against measured valuese4
Value
P > 0.1e4
Comparator
three N approachese4

Verbatim

e0

“compared with measurements from 47 maize crops grown on 16 sites receiving different N fertiliser treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–754
e4

“The linear fits of the predicted against measured values showed no significant difference (P > 0.1) among the three N approaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1314

Title

Mechanisms of nitrogen limitation affecting maize growth: a comparison of different modelling hypotheses

F. Y. Li; P. D. Jamieson; P. R. Johnstone; et al. Crop and Pasture Science 2009. doi:10.1071/cp08412

Other claims from this paper (8)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regressions grouped by fertilization level did not improve the fits.

Taxon
Leucaena leucocephalaLeucaena leucocephalat0
Treatment
niveles de fertilizacióne2
Outcome
ajustese2
Direction
no mejorarone2

Verbatim

t0

“Leucaena leucocephala”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–35
e2

“Las regresiones por niveles de fertilización no mejoraron los ajustes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1081

Title

ESTIMATION OF Leucaena leucocephala LEAF AREA BASED ON ITS DRY MATTER

P. P. del Pozo; Alba Álvarez DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2001

Other claims from this paper (3)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Separate heat stress fits did not improve fit over one equation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
fite0
Direction
did not have an improved fite0
Comparator
one heat stress equatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The heat stress equations fitted separately for each variety did not have an improved fit compared to the one heat stress equation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1157
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85

Title

Back to the Future: Revisiting the Application of an Enzyme Kinetic Equation to Maize Development Nearly Four Decades Later

James R. Kiniry; Sumin Kim; Henri E. Z. Tonnang Agronomy 2019. doi:10.3390/agronomy9090566

Other claims from this paper (7)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AccuPAR equation coefficients did not differ significantly between wheat cultivars or between irrigated and rainfed conditions, so one equation fits all.

Outcome
equation coefficientse1
Qualifier
under both conditionse1
Comparator
cultivarse1

Verbatim

e0

“seven wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–150
e1

“The results showed that there was no significant difference between cultivars and the two conditions as aspect of equation coefficients, so one equation is usable for all cultivars under both conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–792

Title

LEAF AREA INDEX MEASUREMENT BY ACCUPAR INSTRUMENT IN WHEAT

Esmaeil Bakhshandeh; Afshin Soltani; R Ghadiryan 2011

Other claims from this paper (1)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit damage does not induce bracteal nectar production.

Taxon
GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUMGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
fruit damagee0
Outcome
bracteal nectar productione0
Direction
not inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–68
e0

“bracteal nectar production is not induced in response to fruit damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1271

Title

HOW TO BE SWEET? EXTRAFLORAL NECTAR ALLOCATION BY GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM FITS OPTIMAL DEFENSE THEORY PREDICTIONS

Felix L. Wäckers; Claire Bonifay Ecology 2004. doi:10.1890/03-0422

Other claims from this paper (8)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Asymptotic biomass yield did not differ significantly between aboveground and belowground biomass.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Outcome
asymptotic yielde0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
AGB and BGBe0

Verbatim

e0

“Logistic model fits to biomass yield data indicated no significant differences in asymptotic yield between AGB and BGB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–786
t0

“switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86

Title

Accumulation and partitioning of biomass, nutrients, and trace elements in switchgrass for phytoremediation of municipal biosolids

Nicholson N. Jeke; Francis Zvomuya; Lisette Ross International Journal of Phytoremediation 2016. doi:10.1080/15226514.2016.1156634

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GBH of new bamboo stems was not related to variation in stand density.

Taxon
Phyllostachys pubescensPhyllostachys edulist0
Outcome
GBH of new bamboo stemse2
Qualifier
not related to variation in the density of the stande3

Verbatim

t0

“THE STRUCTURE OF A CULM AND SHOOT PRODUCING STAND OF PHYLLOSTACHYS PUBESCENS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76
e2

“The GBH of new bamboo stems fits a normal distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–710
e3

“which was not related to variation in the density of the stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–773

Title

THE STRUCTURE OF A CULM AND SHOOT PRODUCING STAND OF PHYLLOSTACHYS PUBESCENS

Zhu Jin ACTA PHYTOECOLOGICA SINICA 2000

Other claims from this paper (3)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

First-last stocking did not significantly change pasture structure.

Taxon
grassese1
Treatment
management system with first and last stokinge0
Outcome
structure of the pasturee0
Direction
does not provide significant changese0
Setting
Campos grasslande0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Despite the management system with first and last stoking does not provide significant changes in the structure of the pasture, it allowed to achieve satisfactory performance goals in areas of Campos grassland.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1245
e1

“different functional groups of grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–366

Title

Does first and last stocking could “fits” Campos grassland structure to improve beef cattle production?

Luciana Marin; Fernando Luiz Ferreira de Quadros; Leandro Bittencourt de Oliveira; et al. Ciência Rural 2022. doi:10.1590/0103-8478cr20210531

Other claims from this paper (7)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.