View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Precipitation did not significantly affect model fits .
Directionnot found to significantly affect e0 Verbatim
e0 “Precipitation was not found to significantly affect the fits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–337 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Slopes of Lucas fits did not differ between primary and regrowth grass and red clover silages.
Taxongrass and red clover e4 Outcomeslopes in Lucas fits e4 Directiondid not differ e4 Verbatim
e4 “The slopes in Lucas fits of primary and regrowth grass and red clover silages did not differ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–595 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Linear fits of predicted against measured values showed no significant difference among the three N approaches.
Outcomelinear fits of the predicted against measured values e4 Comparatorthree N approaches e4 Verbatim
e0 “compared with measurements from 47 maize crops grown on 16 sites receiving different N fertiliser treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–754 e4 “The linear fits of the predicted against measured values showed no significant difference (P > 0.1) among the three N approaches ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1314 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Regressions grouped by fertilization level did not improve the fits .
Treatmentniveles de fertilización e2 Verbatim
t0 “Leucaena leucocephala ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–35 e2 “Las regresiones por niveles de fertilización no mejoraron los ajustes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1081 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Separate heat stress fits did not improve fit over one equation.
Directiondid not have an improved fit e0 Comparatorone heat stress equation e0 Verbatim
e0 “The heat stress equations fitted separately for each variety did not have an improved fit compared to the one heat stress equation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1157 t0 “maize ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
AccuPAR equation coefficients did not differ significantly between wheat cultivars or between irrigated and rainfed conditions, so one equation fits all.
Outcomeequation coefficients e1 Qualifierunder both conditions e1 Verbatim
e0 “seven wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–150 e1 “The results showed that there was no significant difference between cultivars and the two conditions as aspect of equation coefficients, so one equation is usable for all cultivars under both conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–792 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit damage does not induce bracteal nectar production.
Outcomebracteal nectar production e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–68 e0 “bracteal nectar production is not induced in response to fruit damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1271 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Asymptotic biomass yield did not differ significantly between aboveground and belowground biomass.
Outcomeasymptotic yield e0 Directionno significant differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “Logistic model fits to biomass yield data indicated no significant differences in asymptotic yield between AGB and BGB. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–786 t0 “switchgrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The GBH of new bamboo stems was not related to variation in stand density.
OutcomeGBH of new bamboo stems e2 Qualifiernot related to variation in the density of the stand e3 Verbatim
t0 “THE STRUCTURE OF A CULM AND SHOOT PRODUCING STAND OF PHYLLOSTACHYS PUBESCENS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 e2 “The GBH of new bamboo stems fits a normal distribution ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–710 e3 “which was not related to variation in the density of the stand ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–773 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
First-last stocking did not significantly change pasture structure.
Treatmentmanagement system with first and last stoking e0 Outcomestructure of the pasture e0 Directiondoes not provide significant changes e0 SettingCampos grassland e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Despite the management system with first and last stoking does not provide significant changes in the structure of the pasture, it allowed to achieve satisfactory performance goals in areas of Campos grassland. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1245 e1 “different functional groups of grasses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–366 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.