Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter herbage removal by monthly mowing had no significant effect on herbage production in the following seasons.

Treatment: Winter herbage removale0
Outcome: herbage productione0
Direction: no significant effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Winter herbage removal had no significant effect on herbage production in the following seasons”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–372

Title

Effects of winter herbage removal on Flint Hills rangeland

Lisa M. Auen; Clenton E. Owensby Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 1989. doi:10.4148/2378-5977.2282

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbage allowance had no significant effect on net herbage accumulation in any year

Taxon: perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment: Herbage allowancee4
Outcome: NHAe4
Direction: no significant effecte4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“a sward of perennial ryegrass, cv. Gremie”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–76

e4
“Herbage allowance treatment produced no significant effect on NHA in any year”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1225

Title

An assessment of the influence on net herbage accumulation, herbage consumption and individual animal performance of two lengths of grazing rotation and three herbage allowances for grazing beef cattle

P. W. Bartholomew; W. McLauchlan; D. M. B. Chestnutt The Journal of Agricultural Science 1981. doi:10.1017/s0021859600066156

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Annual net herbage accumulation did not differ significantly between the 20-day and 35-day grazing intervals in any year
Intervention effect Net herbage accumulation was 4.7% higher for the longer grazing interval in the first 2 years
Intervention effect Net herbage accumulation was 4.1% lower for the longer grazing interval in the final year of the experiment
Association The interaction of herbage allowance and grazing interval had no significant effect on net herbage accumulation
Intervention effect Herbage consumption was greater in 2 years out of three under the 20-day regrowth period than under the 35-day treatment
Intervention effect Average degree of defoliation was slightly greater with the longer grazing interval (44.0% v. 38.4%)
Intervention effect Decreasing herbage allowance generally reduced animal live-weight gain in all 3 years
Intervention effect Only in 1 year was there a significant difference in live-weight gain between the rotation length treatments

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At similar herbage allowance, herbage intake and sheep liveweight gain did not significantly differ.

Taxon: herbagee0
Outcome: herbage intake and liveweight gain of sheepe0
Direction: no significant differencese0
Qualifier: At a similar herbage allowancee0

Verbatim

e0
“At a similar herbage allowance, there were no significant differences in the herbage intake and liveweight gain of sheep”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1272

Title

The comparative performance of Holcus lanatus and Lolium perenne under sheep grazing in the Scottish uplands

J. D. MORTON; G. R. BOLTON; J. HODGSON Grass and Forage Science 1992. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1992.tb02257.x

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation Perma ryegrass produced more herbage than both Holcus cultivars in the first two harvest years.
Observation Perma ryegrass allowed more sheep grazing days than the Holcus cultivars.
Observation The ryegrass sward had 25% more green sown grass than Holcus swards.
Observation The ryegrass sward had 12% less white clover than Holcus swards.
Observation All three grasses persisted poorly.
Observation Ryegrass presence at the end of the second harvest year was 36%, higher than Massey Basyn at 22%.
Observation Massey Basyn had 22% presence at the end of the second harvest year.
Observation German Commercial had 13% presence at the end of the second harvest year.
Observation Ryegrass had higher organic matter digestibility than either Holcus cultivar.
Observation Ryegrass had lower neutral and acid detergent fibre and lignin contents than Holcus.
Intervention effect Higher post-grazing herbage mass increased herbage production in the second harvest year.
Intervention effect Higher post-grazing herbage mass did not change the proportion of sown grass.
Recommendation The authors conclude ryegrass is superior to Holcus on upland soils with high N, moderate P and high pH.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheep dung produced no measurable herbage response.

Taxon: herbagee0
Treatment: sheep dunge0
Outcome: herbage responsee0
Direction: no measurablee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“There was no measurable herbage response to sheep dung”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–608

Title

Effect of sheep, deer and cattle dung on herbage production and soil nutrient content

P. H. WILLIAMS; R. J. HAYNES Grass and Forage Science 1995. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1995.tb02322.x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Cattle dung initially reduced herbage yield by smothering.
Intervention effect After 40 days, herbage around the cattle dung patch responded positively.
Intervention effect More herbage dry matter was produced in the cattle dung patch than in the control patch during the first 12 months.
Intervention effect Deer dung significantly increased herbage production.
Observation Deer dung was more evenly spread within patches than sheep dung.
Mechanism A greater share of pasture plants received nutrients from deer dung, yielding a measurable response.
Intervention effect Soil nitrate, phosphate and organic C were higher in dung patches than control patches after 12 months.
Intervention effect Cattle dung patches had higher microbial biomass C, arylsulphatase and arylphosphatase activities.
Intervention effect Cattle dung still affected soil organic C levels three years after application.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbage dry matter and herbage N concentrations at R6 were not affected by N fertilizer strategies

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage: R6 stagee2
Outcome: Herbage dry matter (DM) and herbage N concentrationse2
Direction: were not affectede2

Verbatim

t0
“Soybean in Minnesota”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–67

e2
“Herbage dry matter (DM) and herbage N concentrations at the R6 stage were not affected by any of the N fertilizer strategies”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1164

Title

In‐Season Fertilizer Nitrogen Applications for Soybean in Minnesota

Michael A. Schmitt; John A. Lamb; Gyles W. Randall; et al. Agronomy Journal 2001. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.935983x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Fertilizer N treatments did not change soybean seed yield at any of the 12 sites
Intervention effect Polymer-coated urea increased soybean seed yield by less than 0.06 Mg ha-1 in the combined analysis
Intervention effect Applying urea in August increased soybean seed yield by less than 0.06 Mg ha-1 in the combined analysis
Intervention effect Soybean seed protein was statistically different among N treatments but increased only by 0.4 g kg-1
Observation Soybean oil concentration was not affected by fertilizer treatments
Intervention effect Polymer-coated urea increased soil NO3-N at R6 relative to standard urea
Intervention effect Knifed applications increased soil NO3-N at R6 relative to broadcast applications
Intervention effect August applications increased soil NO3-N at R6 relative to July applications
Observation In-season N fertilizer created greater available soil N at all 12 sites during soybean pod filling
Recommendation In-season N fertilizer applications for soybean production are not recommended

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbage allowance did not significantly change nutritive characteristics of pregrazed paspalum herbage in summer.

Taxon: paspalumPaspalume0
Treatment: herbage allowancee1
Outcome: nutritive characteristics of pregrazed herbagee1
Direction: no_changeinferrede1
Setting: summere2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“paspalum ( Paspalum dilatatum L.)-dominant sward”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1246

e1
“Within each herbage mass treatment, there were no significant differences between herbage allowance treatments in nutritive characteristics of pregrazed herbage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1563

e2
“Experiment 2 was conducted in mid lactation (summer)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1190

Title

Effects of variations in herbage mass, allowance, and level of supplement on nutrient intake and milk production of dairy cows in spring and summer

W. J. Wales; P. T. Doyle; C. R. Stockdale; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1999. doi:10.1071/ea98151

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulated herbage showed the same lack of condensed tannin concentration pattern as the regrowth herbage.

Taxon: Lespedeza cuneataLespedeza cuneatat0
Outcome: lack of CT concentration patterne5
Comparator: regrowth herbagee5

Verbatim

t0
“Lespedeza cuneata”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73

e5
“but showed the same lack of CT concentration pattern as the regrowth herbage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1472

Title

Season Progression, Ontogenesis, and Environment Affect Lespedeza cuneata Herbage Condensed Tannin, Fiber, and Crude Protein Concentrations

James P. Muir; Thomas H. Terrill; Jorge A. Mosjidis; et al. Crop Science 2016. doi:10.2135/cropsci2016.07.0605

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na no effect herbage K.

Taxon: Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorumt0
Organ / stage: herbagee0
Treatment: Nae0
Outcome: herbage Ke0
Direction: no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Potassium depressed herbage Ca, Mg and Na concentrations, and Na depressed herbage Ca and Mg where herbage K was low, but had no effect on herbage K.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1119

t0
“Italian ryegrass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–32

Title

The response of Italian ryegrass to sodium, lime and potassium on an acidic Natal soil

A. D. Manson South African Journal of Plant and Soil 1995. doi:10.1080/02571862.1995.10634349

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Italian ryegrass responded significantly to Na treatment.
Intervention effect Italian ryegrass responded significantly to lime treatment.
Intervention effect Italian ryegrass responded significantly to K treatment.
Intervention effect In the first season, sodium application produced a dry-matter response of 1526 kg per hectare.
Observation No consistent lime by sodium interaction was observed.
Intervention effect Potassium depressed herbage Ca, Mg and Na concentrations.
Intervention effect Na depressed herbage Ca and Mg.
Recommendation Sodium applications may benefit ryegrass pasture production when soil phosphorus and potassium are marginal.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of herbage allowance and grazing interval had no significant effect on net herbage accumulation

Taxon: perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment: herbage allowance and grazing intervale5
Outcome: interaction effecte5
Direction: not significante5

Verbatim

e0
“a sward of perennial ryegrass, cv. Gremie”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–76

e5
“The interaction effect of herbage allowance and grazing interval was not significant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1311

Title

An assessment of the influence on net herbage accumulation, herbage consumption and individual animal performance of two lengths of grazing rotation and three herbage allowances for grazing beef cattle

P. W. Bartholomew; W. McLauchlan; D. M. B. Chestnutt The Journal of Agricultural Science 1981. doi:10.1017/s0021859600066156