View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed cited background negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Low herbage mass depresses herbage growth, herbage intake and animal liveweight gain.
TreatmentLow levels of herbage mass e3 Outcomeherbage growth, herbage intake and animal liveweight gain e3 Verbatim
e0 “Levels of herbage mass are frequently low both before and after lambing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–171 e3 “Low levels of herbage mass depress herbage growth, herbage intake and animal liveweight gain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–372 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbage volume per animal unit depends on residual herbage height.
Treatmentresidual herbage height e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Herbage volume per animal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 e1 “We show that the HVAU depends on the residual herbage height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–704 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbage utilization was significantly depressed by increasing herbage maturity.
Treatmentincreasing maturity of herbage e7 OutcomeHerbage utilization e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Influence of defoliation regime on herbage production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 e7 “Herbage utilization was depressed significantly by increasing maturity of herbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1466 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbage age had marked effects on herbage quality.
Treatmentage of herbage e1 Qualifiermarked effects e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–499 e1 “age of herbage had marked effects on herbage quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1683 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Grass herbage was more sensitive to heavy ion radiation than leguminous herbage .
Outcomeradiation sensitivity e0 Comparatorleguminous herbage e0 Verbatim
e0 “radiation sensitivity of grass herbage to the heavy ion beams was much higher than leguminous herbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–484 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Instantaneous herbage accumulation rate had predictable relationships with herbage mass across locations and dates.
Outcomeinstantaneous herbage accumulation rate (HAR i ) e0 Settingeach location and date e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Herbage Mass and Herbage Accumulation Rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–54 e0 “We found predictable relationships between instantaneous herbage accumulation rate (HAR i ) and herbage mass for each location and date. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–945 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Grass herbage was more sensitive to heavy ion beams than leguminous herbage .
Outcomeradiation sensitivity e0 Comparatorleguminous herbage e0 Verbatim
e0 “radiation sensitivity of grass herbage to heavy ion beams was much higher than that of leguminous herbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–614 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Regrowth herbage had lower fiber than initial herbage .
Organ / stageregrowth herbage e0 Comparatorinitial herbage e0 Verbatim
e0 “the regrowth herbage had a lower fiber and a higher protein content than the initial herbage . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1238 t0 “Brassica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–46 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Winter herbage removal by monthly mowing had no significant effect on herbage production in the following seasons.
TreatmentWinter herbage removal e0 Outcomeherbage production e0 Directionno significant effect e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Winter herbage removal had no significant effect on herbage production in the following seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–372 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Regrowth herbage had higher protein content than initial herbage .
Organ / stageregrowth herbage e0 Comparatorinitial herbage e0 Verbatim
e0 “the regrowth herbage had a lower fiber and a higher protein content than the initial herbage . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1238 t0 “Brassica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–46 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.