View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Deviations of NIRS predicted NEL values from reference values were not related to NEL concentration.
Outcomedeviations of NIRS predicted values from reference values e0 Comparatorreference values e0 Verbatim
e0 “the deviations of NIRS predicted values from reference values were not related to concentration of NEL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1151 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Iodine values and oxidative stability values of peanut were not significantly affected by storage moisture.
OutcomeIodine values and oxidative stability values e7 Verbatim
e7 “Iodine values and oxidative stability values were not significantly affected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1199 t0 “Storage and Moisture Effects on Peanut Composition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cross SCA values were not directly correlated with parental GCA values .
OutcomeSCA values of crosses e0 ComparatorGCA values of parents e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the SCA values of crosses and the GCA values of parents were not directly correlated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–866 t0 “Burley Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–84 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum daily Kc values of late-planted soybean were not different from published values .
Outcomemaximum daily K c values e1 Comparatorpublished values e1 Verbatim
e0 “Glycine max (L.) Merr. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–680 e1 “maximum daily K c values were not different than published values ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1194 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
When shootfly incidence was high, F3 resistance values were equal to the midparental values .
OutcomeF3 resistance values e2 QualifierWhen shootfly incidence was high e2 Comparatormidparental values e2 Verbatim
t0 “shootfly resistance in grain sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–80 e2 “When shootfly incidence was high, F3 resistance values equal to the midparental values were obtained ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–527 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Extractive values and ash values were equal in all dosage forms.
Outcomeextractive values, ash values e7 Verbatim
t0 “Eclipta Alba Hassk. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–91 e7 “All the tests like extractive values , ash values , and others were having equal results in all dosage forms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1001 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shear force, succulometer values and Hunter b values were not significantly related to processing time.
Taxon‘Babygold 7’ Peaches t0 Treatmentprocessing time e0 OutcomeShear force, succulometer values, and Hunter “b” values e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Shear force, succulometer values , and Hunter “b” values were significantly related to maturity, but not to processing time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–328 t0 “‘Babygold 7’ Peaches ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–38 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sensory overall flavor values did not differ significantly from instrumental predicted values .
Outcomeoverall flavor values e0 Directiondo not have significant difference e0 Comparatorinstrumental predicted values e0 Verbatim
e0 “The result is that the overall flavor values obtained from the sensory test do not have significant difference with the instrumental predicted values . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–961 t0 “long-grain rice ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 27–42 Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Karl Fischer moisture values were not significantly different from air oven values .
OutcomeKF moisture values e0 Directionnot significantly different e0 Verbatim
e0 “KF moisture values were not significantly different from air oven and vacuum oven methods. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–675 t0 “sunflower seed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Karl Fischer moisture values were not significantly different from vacuum oven values .
OutcomeKF moisture values e0 Directionnot significantly different e0 Verbatim
e0 “KF moisture values were not significantly different from air oven and vacuum oven methods. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–675 t0 “sunflower seed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.