View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
TD2116 had a favorable detoxification effect on acetochlor phytotoxicity to maize.
Outcomedetoxification effect on acetochlor phytotoxicity e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Acetochlor Phytotoxicity to Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–77 e2 “TD2116 had a favorable detoxification effect on acetochlor phytotoxicity to maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–227 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
No fruit phytotoxicity was noticed.
OutcomeNo effect of phytotoxicity e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “No effect of phytotoxicity was noticed on fruits. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1720 t0 “industry tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–823 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Edifenphos gave the greatest antidoting effect against pendimethalin phytotoxicity .
Outcomeantidoting effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The greatest antidoting effect was obtained from edifenphos ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–597 e1 “rice (Oryza saliva L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–227 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying PGAE at the early stage of phytotoxicity gave the best effect among the antidotes
Treatmentspraying PGAE at the early stage of phytotoxicity e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Phytotoxicity in Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–65 e4 “the effect was the best after spraying PGAE at the early stage of phytotoxicity , compared with the MCPANa, the yield of PGAE increased by 50.42% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–848 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
None of the insecticide formulations caused okra phytotoxicity .
Outcomephytotoxicity effect e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “none of the insecticide formulations have phytotoxicity effect in okra ecosystem ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1368 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
No phytotoxicity was noticed in the hazelnut shoot-control trial.
OutcomeNo effect of phytotoxicity e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “No effect of phytotoxicity was noticed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2011–2050 t0 “hazelnut shoots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–70 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Silicomolybdic acid relieved phytotoxicity in tomato, with a 42.6% higher effect than the control pesticide.
Treatment3.6% silicomolybdic acid e0 Outcomerelieving the phytotoxicity e2 Comparatorcontrol pesticide e2 Verbatim
e0 “3.6% silicomolybdic acid had evident effect on helping cucumber resist low temperature and tomato relieve phytotoxicity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–143 e2 “it also had 42.6% higher effect than the control pesticide in relieving the phytotoxicity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–392 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The formulation showed no phytotoxicity .
Outcomeno phytotoxicity e0 Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “it was no phytotoxicity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–279 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
No tested insecticide formulation caused phytotoxicity in okra.
Treatmentinsecticide formulations e0 Outcomephytotoxicity effect e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “none of the insecticide formulations had phytotoxicity effect in okra ecosystem ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1142 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Chemical analysis and phytotoxicity tests together allowed estimation of heavy metal availability and of the effect on Sesbania species.
Outcomeestimate heavy metal availability e0 Comparatorchemical analysis e0 Verbatim
e0 “The use of chemical analysis and phytotoxicity tests allowed to estimate heavy metal availability and the effect on both Sesbania species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1333 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.