View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
edge defoliation ,excavating defoliation ,top defoliation
Outcomeedge defoliation,excavating defoliation,top defoliation e0 Verbatim
e0 “edge defoliation ,excavating defoliation ,top defoliation ,lower epidermis defoliation and middle vein defoliation were the most important types damaging leaves of Castanopsis sclerophylla ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–613 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation strategy significantly affected defoliation ratings.
Treatmentdefoliation strategy e0 Outcomedefoliation ratings e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “both cultivar and defoliation strategy had a significant effect on defoliation ratings. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1021 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Nonuniform defoliation reduced yield more than uniform defoliation .
TreatmentNonuniform defoliation e0 Directiongreater yield reduction e0 Comparatoruniform defoliation e0 Verbatim
e0 “Nonuniform defoliation resulted in greater yield reduction than uniform defoliation . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–883 t0 “Potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aggressive defoliation decreased defoliation in three locations.
Treatmentaggressive defoliation treatment e0 Qualifierall three locations e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The aggressive defoliation treatment decreased defoliation and increased desiccation in all three locations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1129 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hot air produced cotton defoliation rates nearly equal to chemical defoliation .
Treatmenthot air treatment e0 Outcomedefoliation rates e0 Comparatorconventional chemical defoliation e0 Verbatim
t0 “Thermal Defoliation of Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–29 e0 “Thermal defoliation by hot air treatment resulted in defoliation rates nearly equal to those resulting from conventional chemical defoliation . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrement due to top defoliation was greater than that due to basal defoliation .
Treatmenttop defoliation e5 Outcomedecrement due to defoliation e5 Comparatorbasal defoliation e5 Verbatim
t0 “mungbean (Vigna radiata Wilczek) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–92 e5 “The decrement due to defoliation was greater in top defoliation than the basal defoliation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1119 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Top defoliation reduced yield more than basal defoliation .
Treatmenttop defoliation e0 OutcomeReduction in yield e0 Comparatorbasal defoliation e0 Verbatim
e0 “Reduction in yield was higher with top defoliation than basal defoliation . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1280 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation at 40 DAS gave higher growth than defoliation at 60 DAS or no defoliation .
TreatmentDefoliation at 40 DAS e0 Comparatordefoliation at 60 DAS or the no defoliation control e0 Verbatim
e0 “Defoliation at 40 DAS resulted in a higher rate of photosynthesis (P N), growth and yield compared to defoliation at 60 DAS or the no defoliation control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–688 t0 “mustard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation at 40 DAS gave higher yield than defoliation at 60 DAS or no defoliation .
TreatmentDefoliation at 40 DAS e0 Comparatordefoliation at 60 DAS or the no defoliation control e0 Verbatim
e0 “Defoliation at 40 DAS resulted in a higher rate of photosynthesis (P N), growth and yield compared to defoliation at 60 DAS or the no defoliation control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–688 t0 “mustard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation reduced cauliflower head mass, increasingly at greater defoliation levels.
Qualifierlevel of defoliation e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Defoliation reduced final head mass, the amount of the reduction increasing with level of defoliation . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–409 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.