View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Pollinators IP -1497, IP -973, IP -872 and IP -10085 proved useful for breeding high yielding pearl millet hybrids.
MaterialIP-1497, IP-973, IP-872 and IP-10085 e2 Outcomeutility for breeding high yielding hybrids e2 Verbatim
t0 “pearl millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 e2 “Pollinators IP -1497, IP -973, IP -872 and IP -10085 proved their utility for breeding high yielding hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–474 Other claims from this paper (12) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend IP 10151, IP 20577 and IP 10437 for general cultivation.
MaterialIP 10151, IP 20577 and IP 10437 e0 Outcomegeneral cultivation e0 Verbatim
e0 “these three cultivars viz., IP 10151, IP 20577 and IP 10437 may be considered for general cultivation under marginal environments of Gujarat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1354 t0 “pearl millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nine accessions are promising sources for total tillers per plant.
MaterialIP 3628, IP 15285, IP 15288, IP 15302, IP 15342, IP 15351, IP 15290, IP 20347 and IP 20350 e1 Outcometotal tillers per plant e1 Verbatim
t0 “pearl millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 e1 “IP 3628, IP 15285, IP 15288, IP 15302, IP 15342, IP 15351, IP 15290, IP 20347 and IP 20350 for total tillers per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1184 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
IP 15710, IP 15735 and IP 15752 are promising sources for stem thickness and leaf width.
MaterialIP 15710, IP 15735 and IP 15752 e1 Outcomestem thickness and leaf width e1 Verbatim
t0 “pearl millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–93 e1 “IP 15710, IP 15735 and IP 15752 for stem thickness and leaf width ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1060 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
IP 81 and IP 380 were good general combiners.
MaterialIP 81, and IP 380 e0 Outcomegood general combiners e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “IP 81, and IP 380 are good general combiners. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–410 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum diversity also occurred between IP -5275 and IP -14644.
MaterialIP-5275 vs. IP-14644 e0 OutcomeMaximum diversity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum diversity was observed between IP -9416 vs. ICTP-8203, IP -5275 vs. IP -14644, IP -8276 vs. IP -18742. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1039 t0 “Pearl Millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum diversity also occurred between IP -8276 and IP -18742.
MaterialIP-8276 vs. IP-18742 e0 OutcomeMaximum diversity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum diversity was observed between IP -9416 vs. ICTP-8203, IP -5275 vs. IP -14644, IP -8276 vs. IP -18742. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1039 t0 “Pearl Millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The IP accession group had a relationship coefficient of 0.78.
MaterialIP-1A, IP-1M, IP-1P, IP-2A, IP-2M, and IP-2P e0 Verbatim
e0 “the accessions consisted of IP -1A, IP -1M, IP -1P, IP -2A, IP -2M, and IP -2P (coefficient 0.78) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1474 t0 “Jatropha curcas L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The chromosomes of the IP /DS// IP map were longer than those of the IP /DS//DS map.
MaterialIP/DS//IP population e1 Outcomelength of each chromosome e1 ComparatorIP/DS//DS population e1 Verbatim
t0 “Populations of Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–118 e1 “The length of each chromosome was longer in the IP /DS// IP population than in the IP /DS//DS population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–642 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
IP 0% × PD 22 was at par with IP 0% × PD 33, IP 20% × PD 22 and IP 20% × PD 17 for chlorophyll content in GCI.
Outcomechlorophyll content e2 ComparatorIP 0% × PD 33 , IP 20% × PD 22 , and IP 20% × PD 17 e2 Verbatim
e2 “However, in SI IP 0% × PD 22 statistically at par ( p ≥0.05) with IP 0% × PD 33 , IP 20% × PD 22 , and IP 20% × PD 17 (for chlorophyll content in GCI); IP 0% × PD 17 and IP 20% × PD 22 (for leaf relative water content in GCII); and IP 0% × PD 33 , IP 20% × PD 33 , and IP 20% × PD 22 (for cell membrane stability index in GCII) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1443 t0 “Forage Clitoria ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–62 Other claims from this paper (17) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.