Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“Net return”

16,211 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 1,866 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 2 earlier · 1910s

Refine

More filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop geometry 45×10 gave the highest gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: 45×10e6
Outcome: gross return, net return and net return per rupee investmente6
Direction: higheste6
Comparator: 45×30e6

Verbatim

t0
“Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56

e6
“Crop geometry was recorded highest gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment in 45×10 and lowest in 45×30”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1535

Title

Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation and feasibility of economics

Chandraprakash Verma; Vivek Kumar Tripathi; Lok Prakash Verma; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i3x.9451

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Soybean variety RSC 1046 had significantly higher plant population, plant height and number of branches per plant.
Intervention effect Soybean variety RSC 1046 had significantly higher dry matter accumulation, leaf area index and seed yield.
Intervention effect Crop geometry 45×5 gave the maximum plant population and plant height.
Intervention effect Crop geometry 45×10 gave the maximum number of branches and dry matter accumulation per plant.
Intervention effect Crop geometry 45×5 gave the maximum leaf area index per plant.
Intervention effect Crop geometry 45×10 gave the maximum seed yield.
Association An interaction between variety and crop geometry was recorded for seed yield.
Association Seed yield rose linearly with plant population, with the maximum in RSC 1046 at 45×10 cm geometry.
Intervention effect Gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment were higher for RSC 1046 than for CG Soya 1.
Intervention effect Cost of cultivation was higher in crop geometry 45×5 than in 45×30.
Intervention effect Cost of cultivation was the same across varieties, while crop geometry changed it.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment were higher for RSC 1046 than for CG Soya 1.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material: RSC 1046e5
Treatment: varietye5
Outcome: gross return, net return and net return per rupee investmente5
Direction: highere5
Comparator: CG Soya 1e5

Verbatim

t0
“Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56

e5
“There was gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment higher in variety RSC 1046 and lowest in CG Soya 1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1409

Title

Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation and feasibility of economics

Chandraprakash Verma; Vivek Kumar Tripathi; Lok Prakash Verma; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i3x.9451

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Soybean variety RSC 1046 had significantly higher plant population, plant height and number of branches per plant.
Intervention effect Soybean variety RSC 1046 had significantly higher dry matter accumulation, leaf area index and seed yield.
Intervention effect Crop geometry 45×5 gave the maximum plant population and plant height.
Intervention effect Crop geometry 45×10 gave the maximum number of branches and dry matter accumulation per plant.
Intervention effect Crop geometry 45×5 gave the maximum leaf area index per plant.
Intervention effect Crop geometry 45×10 gave the maximum seed yield.
Association An interaction between variety and crop geometry was recorded for seed yield.
Association Seed yield rose linearly with plant population, with the maximum in RSC 1046 at 45×10 cm geometry.
Intervention effect Crop geometry 45×10 gave the highest gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment.
Intervention effect Cost of cultivation was higher in crop geometry 45×5 than in 45×30.
Intervention effect Cost of cultivation was the same across varieties, while crop geometry changed it.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage net return was lower than conventional-tillage net return.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: NTe0
Outcome: net returne0
Direction: lowere0
Comparator: CT systemse0

Verbatim

e0
“Soybean yield and net return were lower in NT compared to CT systems”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1462

Title

Weed Management in Transgenic Soybean Resistant to Glyphosate Under Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage Systems

Krishna N. Reddy Journal of New Seeds 2001. doi:10.1300/j153v03n01_03

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Single or sequential postemergence glyphosate gave at least 91% control of nine listed weeds.
Intervention effect Postemergence-only programs controlled weeds as effectively as preemergence followed by postemergence programs.
Intervention effect Two postemergence glyphosate applications produced the highest soybean yield, 2,710 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Two postemergence glyphosate applications produced the highest net return, $280/ha.
Intervention effect A single postemergence glyphosate application gave greater net return than the conventional herbicide program.
Intervention effect The single postemergence glyphosate and conventional herbicide programs had similar soybean yields.
Intervention effect Adding preemergence herbicides tended to increase herbicide costs.
Intervention effect Adding preemergence herbicides tended to decrease net returns compared with two glyphosate postemergence applications.
Intervention effect No-tillage soybean yield was lower than conventional-tillage yield.
Mechanism Lower soybean stand establishment under no tillage explained the lower yield and return.
Mechanism When herbicide programs yield comparably, program cost determines net return.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average inbred net return was 38% below hybrid net return.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: inbrede0
Outcome: Average net returne0
Direction: lowere0
Value: 38%e0
Comparator: hybrid ricee0

Verbatim

e0
“Average net return of inbred rice was 38% lower compared to that of hybrid rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1267

Title

Assessment of Technical Efficiency of Inbred HYV and Hybrid Rice Cultivation at Farm Level

MA Salam; MAB Siddique; J Parvin Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 2012. doi:10.3329/bjar.v37i2.11225

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Hybrid seed, TSP and MP application did not differ significantly from recommended rates.
Observation Farmers applied urea and inbred HYV seed at significantly higher rates than recommended.
Observation Hybrid farms incurred total costs of Tk. 63377/ha.
Observation Inbred farms incurred total costs of Tk. 61195/ha.
Observation Hybrid rice yielded net returns of Tk. 59,056/ha.
Observation Inbred HYV rice yielded net returns of Tk. 42,818/ha.
Observation Inbred benefit cost ratio was 1.93.
Observation Hybrid benefit cost ratio was 1.70.
Observation Inbred HYV grain yield averaged 6.03 t/ha.
Observation Inbred HYV by product yield was 4.50 t/ha.
Observation Hybrid grain yield averaged 7.76 t/ha.
Observation Hybrid by product yield averaged 5.50 t/ha.
Association Education, experience, extension contact, land type, seedling age and seedlings per hill were major determinants of technical inefficiency.
Observation Mean technical efficiency was approximately 80% among inbred rice producers.
Observation Mean technical efficiency was approximately 86% among hybrid rice producers.
Association More education reduced technical inefficiency in both groups.
Association More extension contact reduced technical inefficiency in both groups.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net return paralleled yield.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: yielde0
Outcome: net returne0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Variable cost/net return calculations showed that net return paralleled yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1412

e1
“winter or spring wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–694

Title

Injury Prevention: Aspects of the Legislative Response

Tom Vitaglione North Carolina Medical Journal 2010. doi:10.18043/ncm.71.6.534

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Precipitation storage efficiency ranged from about 41% to 57% during the period of greatest soil water gain.
Intervention effect Barrier protection improved annually cropped wheat.
Intervention effect Barrier protection improved spring wheat following fallow.
Association Yield was highest under annual crop rotation.
Association The traditional fallow-crop rotation had the lowest yields.
Intervention effect Barrier protection generally provided an economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize French bean intercropping gave higher net return and return per rupee.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: maize + French beane0
Outcome: net return and net return per rupee investmente0
Direction: highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the net return and net return per rupee investment were higher in maize + French bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1169

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48

Title

Yield and economics as influenced by wiier maize (Zea mays)- based intercropping systems in North Bihar

K.K. SINHA; S.S. MISHRA; S.J. SlNGH Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v44i1.3458

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Maize potato intercropping reduced weed population and dry weight and raised canopy weed suppression.
Intervention effect Maize potato intercrops increased maize equivalent yield relative to French bean intercrops.
Intervention effect Maize potato intercropping gave higher gross returns.
Intervention effect Higher fertilizer level increased yield attributes and component yields.
Intervention effect Full fertilizer dose had higher net return.
Intervention effect The 75% fertilizer dose had higher return per rupee.
Intervention effect Weedy plots reduced maize yield by 29.63%.
Intervention effect Hand weeding and pendimethalin raised maize equivalent yield versus weedy check.
Intervention effect Chemical weeding raised net return per rupee.

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rampage has promise for increasing net return per acre.

Outcome: increasing net return per acree0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“increasing net return per acre”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–154

Title

Rampage - New Soybean Variety from Iowa

W. R. Fehr; Robert C. Clark Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) 1969

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observation Rampage is described as a new high yielding soybean variety.
Observation Rampage maturity was similar to Hark.
Observation Rampage has promise for reducing production costs.
Observation Rampage performed better in tests outside Iowa than within Iowa.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net return variability usually increased with average net returns.

Taxon: PeachPrunus persicat0
Outcome: net return variabilitye0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: average net returnse0

Verbatim

e0
“in most cases, net return variability increased as average net returns increased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–552

t0
“PeachRootstocks”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61

Title

Impact of Production Risk on the Selection of PeachRootstocks

Jayson K. Harper; George M. Greene II Journal of American Pomological Society 1998. doi:10.71318/apom.1998.52.1.41

Other claims from this paper (5)

Association Tree mortality strongly affected orchard yield and rootstock economics.
Observation Halford, own-rooted Redhaven, Bailey and Lovell were good choices by average net returns.
Observation Halford, own-rooted Redhaven and Bailey ranked in the top three across risk intervals.
Intervention effect Tree replacement did not materially change preference rankings.
Observation Amandier, St. Julien, Damas, Siberian C and Citation performed poorly relative to other rootstocks.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had the highest gross return, net return and BCR.

Treatment: T3 treatmente0
Outcome: gross return, net return and BCRe0
Direction: higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the highest gross return, net return and BCR were recorded in the T3 treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–1988

Title

Integrated Nutrient Management Improves Productivity and Quality of Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)

Md. Shamsul Arefin; Md. Ariful Islam; Md. Mokhlesur Rahman; et al. Phyton 2021. doi:10.32604/phyton.2022.017359

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect T3 gave the maximum tillers, dry matter and millable cane, followed by T4.
Intervention effect T3 gave the maximum cane yield and sugar yield, followed by T4.
Intervention effect T3 gave the highest stalk heights, similar to treatments other than T1 and T2.
Intervention effect T3 had significant brix and pol in cane.
Intervention effect T7 had the highest juice purity.
Intervention effect T3 had the highest jaggery sucrose content, color transmittance and recovery, similar to T4.
Intervention effect T3 had the lowest jaggery ash content, similar to T4.
Intervention effect T6 had the highest production cost.
Intervention effect Integrated fertilizer packages did not significantly change measured soil properties over one sugarcane cycle.
Recommendation The authors recommend T3 followed by T4 for higher sugarcane yield and quality without soil fertility degradation.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IPM module increased net return.

Outcome: net returne0
Direction: highere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“The studies also showed that net return was also higher.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–627

Title

Impact of IPM modules on major pests of cucumber

Shivangi Singh; K. Mayank; Ranjeeta Maurya; et al. Indian Journal of Entomology 2014

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Module M2 had the lowest incidence of cucumber pests.
Observation M2 produced maximum cucumber fruit yield of 356.33 q/ha in 2010.
Observation M2 produced maximum cucumber fruit yield of 355.45 q/ha in 2011.
Recommendation The authors concluded that pesticide use, seed treatment and other IPM strategies keep pest populations below the economic threshold while increasing productivity.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“Net return”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics