View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism names are matched through NCBI Taxonomy: “cassava” → Manihot esculenta . Claims whose organism was placed there count as matches whatever the abstract calls it (maize, corn, Zea mays).
Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping kept the canopy environment of cassava more moist by 5-10 g/kg compared with monoculture.
canopy environment of cassava e1 Verbatim
e0 “Intercropping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–417 e1 “it significantly reduced weed growth by 25–45% and nematode infection in okra by 36%, and kept the canopy environment of cassava cooler by 3·0–4·4°C and more moist by 5–10g/kg, compared with monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–726 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping kept the canopy environment of cassava cooler by 3.0-4.4 degrees C compared with monoculture.
canopy environment of cassava e1 Verbatim
e0 “Intercropping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–417 e1 “it significantly reduced weed growth by 25–45% and nematode infection in okra by 36%, and kept the canopy environment of cassava cooler by 3·0–4·4°C and more moist by 5–10g/kg, compared with monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–726 Other claims from this paper (18) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Harvest index was significantly correlated with canopy photosynthesis in 1984 (r = 0.76).
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The HI was significantly correlated with CPn (r= 0.76*) and storage root yield (r=0.92*) during 1984. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1286 t0 “field-grown cassava ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Canopy photosynthesis differed significantly only in 1983 and ranged from 1.31 to 1.97 mg CO2 m-2s-1.
Canopy photosynthesis e0 t0 1.31 to 1.97 mg CO2 m-2s-1 e0 t0 only during 1983 e0 t0 Verbatim
e0 “Canopy photosynthesis differed significantly only during 1983 and varied from 1.31 to 1.97 mg CO2 m-2s-1. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1024 t0 “field-grown cassava ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod-sucking bugs on cowpea decreased in cassava intercrops, following the flower thrips trend.
Pod-sucking bugs e7 decrease inferred e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “cassava intercropped with cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–65 e7 “Pod-sucking bugs followed the same trend as that of flower thrips ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1255 e0 “The micro- environment created by the intercrops reduced the populations of flower thrips but increased those of the pod borer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1051 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect In 1987, cut-back cassava intercrops had 408 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, two-thirds debranched cassava intercrops had 387 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, defoliated cassava intercrops had 298 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 22 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 17.5 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 21.4 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 16.7 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect In 1988 the intercrops reduced flower thrips on cowpea, as in 1987. Recommendation Intercropping cassava with cowpea can be manipulated to help manage cowpea pests. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In 1988 the intercrops reduced flower thrips on cowpea, as in 1987.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “cassava intercropped with cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–65 e2 “Flower thrips (Megalurothrips sjostedti Tryb.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–187 e5 “The same trend was observed in 1988 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–924 e0 “The micro- environment created by the intercrops reduced the populations of flower thrips but increased those of the pod borer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1051 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect In 1987, cut-back cassava intercrops had 408 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, two-thirds debranched cassava intercrops had 387 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, defoliated cassava intercrops had 298 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 22 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 17.5 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 21.4 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 16.7 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Pod-sucking bugs on cowpea decreased in cassava intercrops, following the flower thrips trend. Recommendation Intercropping cassava with cowpea can be manipulated to help manage cowpea pests. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cassava intercrops had 22 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops.
increase inferred e0 15.8 in the sole crops e6 Verbatim
t0 “cassava intercropped with cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–65 e3 “the legume pod borer, (Maruca vitrata Fabricius) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–237 e6 “Seasonal means of 22, 17.5, 21.4, and 16.7 pod borers per 20 flowers were recorded in the intercrops compared to 15.8 in the sole crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1188 e0 “The micro- environment created by the intercrops reduced the populations of flower thrips but increased those of the pod borer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1051 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect In 1987, cut-back cassava intercrops had 408 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, two-thirds debranched cassava intercrops had 387 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, defoliated cassava intercrops had 298 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 17.5 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 21.4 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 16.7 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Pod-sucking bugs on cowpea decreased in cassava intercrops, following the flower thrips trend. Intervention effect In 1988 the intercrops reduced flower thrips on cowpea, as in 1987. Recommendation Intercropping cassava with cowpea can be manipulated to help manage cowpea pests. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cassava intercrops had 17.5 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops.
increase inferred e0 15.8 in the sole crops e6 Verbatim
t0 “cassava intercropped with cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–65 e3 “the legume pod borer, (Maruca vitrata Fabricius) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–237 e6 “Seasonal means of 22, 17.5, 21.4, and 16.7 pod borers per 20 flowers were recorded in the intercrops compared to 15.8 in the sole crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1188 e0 “The micro- environment created by the intercrops reduced the populations of flower thrips but increased those of the pod borer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1051 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect In 1987, cut-back cassava intercrops had 408 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, two-thirds debranched cassava intercrops had 387 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, defoliated cassava intercrops had 298 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 22 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 21.4 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 16.7 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Pod-sucking bugs on cowpea decreased in cassava intercrops, following the flower thrips trend. Intervention effect In 1988 the intercrops reduced flower thrips on cowpea, as in 1987. Recommendation Intercropping cassava with cowpea can be manipulated to help manage cowpea pests. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cassava intercrops had 21.4 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops.
increase inferred e0 15.8 in the sole crops e6 Verbatim
t0 “cassava intercropped with cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–65 e3 “the legume pod borer, (Maruca vitrata Fabricius) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–237 e6 “Seasonal means of 22, 17.5, 21.4, and 16.7 pod borers per 20 flowers were recorded in the intercrops compared to 15.8 in the sole crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1188 e0 “The micro- environment created by the intercrops reduced the populations of flower thrips but increased those of the pod borer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1051 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect In 1987, cut-back cassava intercrops had 408 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, two-thirds debranched cassava intercrops had 387 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, defoliated cassava intercrops had 298 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 22 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 17.5 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 16.7 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Pod-sucking bugs on cowpea decreased in cassava intercrops, following the flower thrips trend. Intervention effect In 1988 the intercrops reduced flower thrips on cowpea, as in 1987. Recommendation Intercropping cassava with cowpea can be manipulated to help manage cowpea pests. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cassava intercrops had 16.7 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops.
increase inferred e0 15.8 in the sole crops e6 Verbatim
t0 “cassava intercropped with cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–65 e3 “the legume pod borer, (Maruca vitrata Fabricius) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–237 e6 “Seasonal means of 22, 17.5, 21.4, and 16.7 pod borers per 20 flowers were recorded in the intercrops compared to 15.8 in the sole crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1188 e0 “The micro- environment created by the intercrops reduced the populations of flower thrips but increased those of the pod borer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1051 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect In 1987, cut-back cassava intercrops had 408 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, two-thirds debranched cassava intercrops had 387 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect In 1987, defoliated cassava intercrops had 298 flower thrips per 20 flowers on cowpea, fewer than sole cowpea. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 22 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 17.5 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Cassava intercrops had 21.4 pod borers per 20 flowers on cowpea, more than sole crops. Intervention effect Pod-sucking bugs on cowpea decreased in cassava intercrops, following the flower thrips trend. Intervention effect In 1988 the intercrops reduced flower thrips on cowpea, as in 1987. Recommendation Intercropping cassava with cowpea can be manipulated to help manage cowpea pests. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Manihot esculenta
Vigna unguiculata
Maruca vitrata