View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: pea ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d under salinity.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “These changes were associated with a decrease in the relative water content and the K+ concentrations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–613 t0 “plants of pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. EC 33866) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–118 e1 “Salinity affected all of the considered parameters. Thus, high NaCl concentrations caused a great reduction in growth parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–422 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d ascorbate content in pea nodules by 59% relative to well- water ed plants.
Verbatim
t0 “Pea Nodules Subjected to Water Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 e0 “Drought also caused a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–565 e1 “ascorbate (59%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–764 e2 “well- water ed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–290 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d NADP+ content in pea nodules by 31% relative to well- water ed plants.
Verbatim
t0 “Pea Nodules Subjected to Water Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 e0 “Drought also caused a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–565 e1 “NADP+ (31%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–844 e2 “well- water ed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–290 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d NADPH content in pea nodules by 17% relative to well- water ed plants.
Verbatim
t0 “Pea Nodules Subjected to Water Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 e0 “Drought also caused a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–565 e1 “NADPH (17%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–861 e2 “well- water ed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–290 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d reduced glutathione content in pea nodules by 57% relative to well- water ed plants.
Verbatim
t0 “Pea Nodules Subjected to Water Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 e0 “Drought also caused a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–565 e1 “reduced (57%) and oxidized (38%) glutathione ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–810 e2 “well- water ed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–290 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d oxidized glutathione content in pea nodules by 38% relative to well- water ed plants.
Verbatim
t0 “Pea Nodules Subjected to Water Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 e0 “Drought also caused a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–565 e1 “reduced (57%) and oxidized (38%) glutathione ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–810 e2 “well- water ed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–290 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
K+ concentration decrease d under salinity.
OutcomeK+ concentrations e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the relative water content and the K+ concentrations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–613 t0 “plants of pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. EC 33866) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–118 e1 “Salinity affected all of the considered parameters. Thus, high NaCl concentrations caused a great reduction in growth parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–422 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 100% relative humidity, chilling caused no significant fall in leaf soluble protein.
Treatmentchilled at 5°C, 100% r.h. e0 Outcomeleaf soluble protein e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “When plants of each species were chilled at 5°C, 100% r.h., water loss was greatly reduced or prevented and there was no significant decrease in leaf soluble protein ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1342 e1 “pea (chill-resistant), mung bean (highly chill-sensitive), and tomato and french bean ( in termediate chilling-sensitivity) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–344 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.