View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem diameter essentially stopped growing below 8℃.
Directionstopped growing e0 Qualifiertemperature was below 8℃ e0 Verbatim
t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–23 e0 “stem diameter basically stopped growing when the temperature was below 8℃ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–917 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Later growing shoot diameter was proposed to determine flower head diameter .
Organ / stagegrowing shoot e0 Outcomediameter of the flower head e0 Verbatim
e0 “Later in the development the diameter of the growing shoot is a determinant of the diameter of the flower head ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–952 t0 “sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–109 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Growing space affected mean trunk diameter .
Outcomeaverage diameter e0 Not reported Setting Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The results showed that growing space directly affected the average diameter . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1323 t0 “Growing space in a 35-year-old Pinus taeda stand ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fast- growing species had higher diameter growth rates than slow- growing species.
Outcomediameter growth rates e0 Comparatorslow-growing species e0 Verbatim
e0 “Fast- growing species had higher survival and diameter growth rates than slow- growing species. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1180 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
A dominant free- growing tree of 48.7 cm diameter required 0.0060 hectare of growing space.
TaxonDaniellia Oliverii t0 Qualifierdiameter 48.7 cm e0 Verbatim
e0 “a dominant free- growing tree of diameter 48.7 cm diameter tree would require 0.0060 hectare of growing space ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1416 t0 “Daniellia Oliverii ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–55 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Diameter growth occurred somewhat later than height growth in two year seedlings.
Outcomediameter growing e0 Comparatorheight growing e0 Verbatim
t0 “Cinnamoum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 e0 “their diameter growing is a little later than height growing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–632 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Subclone stalk diameter decreased in the early growing stage.
Organ / stageearly growing stage e0 Verbatim
e0 “stalk diameter and sugar content in the early growing stage decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–309 t0 “sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The fast- growing period of diameter was 6~14 years.
TaxonMagnolia offcinalist0 Outcomediameter fast-growing period e0 Verbatim
e0 “diameter fast- growing period was 6~14 a ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–542 t0 “Magnolia offcinalis Medicinal Forests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–101 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Flower number, flower diameter and shoot diameter differed significantly among growing media.
TaxonGERBERA JAMESONII L. e3 Treatmentdifferent substrates e2 Outcomeflower number, flower diameter, shoot diameter e1 Comparatorgrowing media e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e1 “In this substrate, flower number, flower diameter , shoot diameter , stem neck diameter , flower height and vase life showed significant difference among growing media ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–959 e2 “To study the effect of different substrates on growth and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 e3 “GERBERA (GERBERA JAMESONII L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Growing media did not significantly affect pedicle length, pedicle diameter or fruit diameter .
Outcomepedicle length, pedicle diameter, and fruit diameter e4 Directionno_change inferred e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “cultivation of Taurus snowdrop (Galanthus elwesii Hook. f.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–141 e4 “The effects of growing media on pedicle length, pedicle diameter , and fruit diameter were not found to be significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–884 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.