View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
AquaCrop simulated dry biomass better than root dry yield .
simulating dry biomass e0 root dry yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “AquaCrop did a better job of simulating dry biomass than root dry yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–802 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Varieties did not influence dry biomass yield .
dry biomass yield e0 not influenced e0 Verbatim
e0 “The dry biomass yield was not influenced by varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–892 t0 “sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–22 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At maximum dry biomass production, rye reduced dry bean yield .
at maximum dry biomass production e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “at maximum dry biomass production (12.8 Mg ha −1 ) rye reduced dry bean yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–875 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Heritability of fresh and dry biomass yield s was similar.
Heritability for FMY and dry biomass yield (DBY) e0 dry biomass yield (DBY) e0 Verbatim
t0 “switchgrass ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–64 e0 “Heritability for FMY and dry biomass yield (DBY) were similar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–606 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry biomass yield differed significantly among the three fodder germplasm.
dry biomass yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “biomass production of three fodder germplasms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–59 e1 “fresh biomass (p<0.01) and dry biomass yield (p<0.05) of three fodder germplasm differed significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–811 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mucuna pruriens had the highest mean dry biomass yield .
dry biomass yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Mucuna pruriens recorded the highest mean value of dry biomass yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1480 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation The seven forage species differed in nutritional, morphological, and biomass yield traits, excluding stem diameter. Association Edge and middle plants differed significantly. Association Edge plants had more leaves and stems than middle plants across all seven species. Observation Carbohydrate was the most abundant measured feed component. Observation Protein was the next most abundant measured feed component. Observation Crude fiber followed protein in measured abundance. Observation Crude fat had a reported value of 7.32. Observation Leaf N, K, Ca, and Mg were judged suitable for ruminant production across species. Association Protein, crude fat, and crude fiber were strongly positively correlated. Observation Centrosema pubescens had the best overall protein, crude fat, and crude fiber.Recommendation The authors recommend planting grasses and legumes on farm edges for sustainable fodder. Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation significantly affected dry biomass yield .
sweet sorghum cv. Keller e1 Dry biomass yield e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Dry biomass yield was significantly affected by the irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–734 e1 “sweet sorghum cv. Keller ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–365 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The product × interval interaction significantly affected dry biomass yield in switchgrass.
product × interval e4 dry biomass yield e4 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e4 “Year, product, application interval, and product × interval significantly impacted dry biomass yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–884 e2 “vegetatively propagated switchgrass cultivar Cloud Nine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–346 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry biomass yield of hybrid pennisetum was 40.14~48.54 t·hm-2
dry biomass yield e2 40.14~48.54 t·hm-2 e2 Verbatim
e0 “evaluate the adaptability, yield ,and biomass characteristics of hybrid pennisetum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–119 e2 “its dry biomass yield was 40.14~48.54 t·hm-2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–588 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
24 significant SNPs were identified for dry biomass yield in sorghum.
Minicore Collection t0 dry biomass yield e3 Verbatim
t0 “in Sorghum Using Minicore Collection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–91 e3 “24 for dry biomass yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3317–3341 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Panicum virgatum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Mucuna pruriens
Pennisetum
Sorghum