View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Zygotic embryo survival after cryopreservation was 100%, without significant treatment differences.
Treatmentcryopreservation e0 OutcomeSurvival of zygotic embryos e0 Verbatim
e0 “Survival of zygotic embryo s after cryopreservation was also 100%, without significant differences between treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–779 t0 “Jatropha curcas L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–59 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
First-year seedling survival did not differ significantly between ovule-destruction treatments.
Treatmentexperimental treatment t1 Outcomeseedling survival e0 Directiondid not differ e0 Comparatorcontrol seeds t1 Verbatim
e0 “seedling survival during the first year did not differ significantly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1010 t0 “Cryptantha flava ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 t1 “experimental treatment than in control seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–935 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Potting at the two- and three-leaf stages did not significantly affect growth and survival .
Treatmenttwo- and three-leaf stage e0 Outcomegrowth and survival of seedlings e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “potting-out at two different stages of seedling development (i.e. two- and three-leaf stage) did not significantly affect growth and survival of seedlings after acclimatization ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1361 t0 “coconut seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–121 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Catalpa , Chilopsis and xChitalpa taxa did not differ in larval survival or growth.
TaxonCatalpa , Chilopsis , and xChitalpae0 Outcomesurvival or growth of larvae e0 Directionno differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “A no-choice feeding study conducted with CSL in 2005 found no differences in survival or growth of larvae reared on taxa from both sections of Catalpa , Chilopsis , and xChitalpa. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2176–2353 e1 “Ceratomia catalpae (Boisduval) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1529 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Light intensity did not significantly affect pollen tube growth in Kotuku wheat.
Treatmentlight intensity e0 OutcomePollen tube growth e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Pollen tube growth was significantly affected by light intensity in ‘Karamu’ plants but not in ‘Kotuku’ plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–491 t0 “Wheat × Maize Crosses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.