View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Prediction errors matched the magnitude of calculated probable errors .
OutcomePrediction errors e0 Directionsame magnitude e0 Comparatorcalculated probable errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “Prediction errors were of the same magnitude as the calculated probable errors . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1041 e1 “living tobacco plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–600 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cross-validation prediction errors were similar to fitting errors .
Outcomeroot mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEPs) e0 Comparatorfitting errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “The root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEPs) were similar to fitting errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1084 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cross-validation errors were similar to errors from independent data.
Comparatorindependent data e0 Verbatim
e0 “These errors were similar to those computed using independent data. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1342 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Country and crop forecasting errors were comparable to group-level errors .
Comparatorthe ones obtained for the group e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the errors obtained are comparable to the ones obtained for the group. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1073 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Additional errors were found, including errors affecting reported data and manuscript typographical errors .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “we found several others, some of which affect reported data and some of which are simple typographical errors introduced while preparing a manuscript ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1097 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Observed error variance standard errors exceeded expected standard errors in both designs.
OutcomeObserved standard errors of the experimental error variances e0 Comparator“expected standard errors” e0 Verbatim
e0 “Observed standard errors of the experimental error variances were larger than “expected standard errors ” for both Designs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1055 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Errors associated with NIRS estimations were often one-half as large as the experimental and sampling errors .
OutcomeErrors associated with NIRS estimations e0 Comparatorexperimental and sampling errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “Errors associated with NIRS estimations were often one‐half as large as the experimental and sampling errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1741 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Thermal conductance estimation errors were similar in order to porometer measurement errors .
Outcomeerrors in thermal estimates of conductance e0 Comparatormeasurement errors using a porometer e0 SettingSouthern Portugal e1 Verbatim
e0 “The errors in thermal estimates of conductance were of the same order as the measurement errors using a porometer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–796 e1 “measured gs data from a vineyard in Southern Portugal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–681 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Errors resulting from uneven grazing are compared with errors due to transference of fertility.
Outcomeerrors due to transference of fertility e0 Verbatim
e0 “a comparison is made with errors due to transference of fertility ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–368 e1 “white clover ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–95 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Detection errors included more commission errors in upper stems.
Organ / stageupper stem regions e0 Outcomecommission errors e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Error patterns revealed more commission errors in upper stem regions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1283 t0 “Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–501 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.