Search claims · PlantClaims

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar C81-14 gave the highest LAI, light interception and light extinction coefficient.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: C81-14e5
Outcome: LAI, light interception and light extinction coefficiente5
Direction: higheste5

Verbatim

t0
“Cultivars of Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111

e5
“C81-14 also had obtained the highest LAI, light interception and light extinction coefficient”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1430

Title

Assessing Light Interception and Light Extinction Coefficient on Planting Dates of Different Cultivars of Wheat in Esfahan Region

Ali Soleymani; Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian Proceedings of The 2nd World Sustainability Forum 2012. doi:10.3390/wsf2-00840

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected light interception and light extinction coefficient of wheat.
Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected LAI of wheat.
Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected total dry matter and NAR of wheat.
Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected seeds per spike, thousand seed weight and seed yield of wheat.
Intervention effect Crop growth rate of wheat was not affected by planting date.
Intervention effect Planting on 22 October gave the maximum LAI, light interception and light extinction coefficient of wheat.
Intervention effect Planting on 22 October gave the maximum seeds per spike, thousand seed weight and seed yield of wheat.
Intervention effect Cultivar significantly affected light interception and light extinction coefficient of wheat.
Intervention effect Cultivar significantly affected LAI of wheat.
Intervention effect Cultivar significantly affected total dry matter and NAR of wheat.
Intervention effect Cultivar significantly affected thousand seed weight and seed yield of wheat.
Association Cultivar Gaskogen gave the highest seed yield of the cultivars compared.
Association Cultivar C81-14 gave the maximum thousand seed weight of the cultivars compared.
Association The planting date and cultivar interaction significantly affected LAI and light interception of wheat.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light extinction coefficient was estimated at 0.53.

Taxon: Sugarcanet0
Outcome: light extinction coefficiente0
Value: 0.53e0

Verbatim

e0
“a light extinction coefficient ( k ) of 0.53 was estimated”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–735

t0
“Sugarcane”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31

Title

Two‐Year Growth Cycle Sugarcane Crop Parameter Attributes and Their Application in Modeling

Manyowa N. Meki; Jim R. Kiniry; Adel H. Youkhana; et al. Agronomy Journal 2015. doi:10.2134/agronj14.0588

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation Dry biomass yield was 80.20 Mg ha −1.
Observation Leaf area index was 7.50.
Observation Radiation use efficiency was 2.06 g MJ −1.
Association Crop growth rate correlated highly with LAI (R2 0.86).
Observation Stalk density was estimated at 18 stalks m −2.
Observation Maximum plant height was 3.6 m.
Observation Rooting depth exceeded 2.0 m.
Method / resource ALMANAC accurately simulated yields across soil types and management scenarios.
Method / resource Mean simulation errors ranged from –6.4% to 1.8%.
Method / resource Measured and simulated yields did not significantly differ.
Recommendation The authors recommend ALMANAC for evaluating yield maximizing management alternatives.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar significantly affected light interception and light extinction coefficient of wheat.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: cultivare3
Outcome: light interception, light extinction coefficiente3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0
“Cultivars of Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111

e3
“The influence of cultivar of LAI, total dry matter, NAR, light interception, light extinction coefficient, a thousand seed weight and seed yield was significant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1129

Title

Assessing Light Interception and Light Extinction Coefficient on Planting Dates of Different Cultivars of Wheat in Esfahan Region

Ali Soleymani; Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian Proceedings of The 2nd World Sustainability Forum 2012. doi:10.3390/wsf2-00840

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected light interception and light extinction coefficient of wheat.
Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected LAI of wheat.
Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected total dry matter and NAR of wheat.
Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected seeds per spike, thousand seed weight and seed yield of wheat.
Intervention effect Crop growth rate of wheat was not affected by planting date.
Intervention effect Planting on 22 October gave the maximum LAI, light interception and light extinction coefficient of wheat.
Intervention effect Planting on 22 October gave the maximum seeds per spike, thousand seed weight and seed yield of wheat.
Intervention effect Cultivar significantly affected LAI of wheat.
Intervention effect Cultivar significantly affected total dry matter and NAR of wheat.
Intervention effect Cultivar significantly affected thousand seed weight and seed yield of wheat.
Association Cultivar Gaskogen gave the highest seed yield of the cultivars compared.
Association Cultivar C81-14 gave the highest LAI, light interception and light extinction coefficient.
Association Cultivar C81-14 gave the maximum thousand seed weight of the cultivars compared.
Association The planting date and cultivar interaction significantly affected LAI and light interception of wheat.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting on 22 October gave the maximum LAI, light interception and light extinction coefficient of wheat.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Plantation on 22th Octe2
Outcome: LAI, light interception, light extinction coefficiente2
Direction: maximume2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Cultivars of Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111

e2
“Plantation on 22th Oct had obtained the maximum LAI, light interception, light extinction coefficient”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1533

Title

Assessing Light Interception and Light Extinction Coefficient on Planting Dates of Different Cultivars of Wheat in Esfahan Region

Ali Soleymani; Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian Proceedings of The 2nd World Sustainability Forum 2012. doi:10.3390/wsf2-00840

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected light interception and light extinction coefficient of wheat.
Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected LAI of wheat.
Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected total dry matter and NAR of wheat.
Intervention effect Planting date significantly affected seeds per spike, thousand seed weight and seed yield of wheat.
Intervention effect Crop growth rate of wheat was not affected by planting date.
Intervention effect Planting on 22 October gave the maximum seeds per spike, thousand seed weight and seed yield of wheat.
Intervention effect Cultivar significantly affected light interception and light extinction coefficient of wheat.
Intervention effect Cultivar significantly affected LAI of wheat.
Intervention effect Cultivar significantly affected total dry matter and NAR of wheat.
Intervention effect Cultivar significantly affected thousand seed weight and seed yield of wheat.
Association Cultivar Gaskogen gave the highest seed yield of the cultivars compared.
Association Cultivar C81-14 gave the highest LAI, light interception and light extinction coefficient.
Association Cultivar C81-14 gave the maximum thousand seed weight of the cultivars compared.
Association The planting date and cultivar interaction significantly affected LAI and light interception of wheat.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated light extinction coefficient remained below 0.5.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Outcome: light extinction coefficiente0
Direction: lowere0
Value: <0.5e0

Verbatim

e0
“The estimated light extinction coefficient ( k ) remained lower (<0.5)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1251

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17

Title

Will future maize improvement programs leverage the canopy light-interception, photosynthetic, and biomass capacities of traditional accessions?

Ahamadeen Nagoor Mohamed Mubarak; Mohammathu Musthapha Mufeeth Mohammathu; Arachchi Devayalage Nishantha Thissa Kumara PeerJ 2023. doi:10.7717/peerj.15233

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TCNM changed light extinction coefficient (21.3%).

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: TCNMe1
Outcome: light extinction coefficiente0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 21.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“21.3% decrease in light extinction coefficient”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–542

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85

e1
“the TCNM saved 10%～30% nitrogen fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–236

Title

Application of the “Three Controls” nutrient management technology for irrigated rice

Zheng Hai-bo Guangdong nongye kexue 2007

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect TCNM changed nitrogen fertilizer (10%～30%).
Intervention effect TCNM changed nitrogen recovery (10%).
Intervention effect TCNM changed Unproductive tiller (lower).
Intervention effect TCNM changed maximum tiller number (lower).
Intervention effect TCNM changed productive tiller percentage (17.7%).
Intervention effect TCNM changed light transmission ratio of the canopy (33.3%).
Intervention effect TCNM changed occurrences of rice leaf roller (75%).
Intervention effect TCNM changed sheath blight severity (35.5%).
Intervention effect TCNM changed pesticide and fungicide application (1～3 times).
Intervention effect TCNM changed grain (5%～10%).
Intervention effect TCNM changed income (50～100 yuan).

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The light extinction coefficient was 0.67.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Outcome: light extinction coefficiente0
Value: 0.67e0

Verbatim

e0
“with a light extinction coefficient of 0.67”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1327

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–115

Title

A recalibrated and tested LINTUL-Cassava simulation model provides insight into the high yield potential of cassava under rainfed conditions

J.G. Adiele; A.G.T. Schut; R.P.M. van den Beuken; et al. European Journal of Agronomy 2021. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2021.126242

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observation Mean seasonal light interception was 80%.
Observation Radiation use efficiency was 2.8 g DM MJ−1 IPAR.
Method / resource After calibration, the model described crop growth and LAI patterns well.
Method / resource Simulated and observed storage root yield were strongly correlated, with R2 of 0.92.
Method / resource Model RMSE for storage root yield was 4.93 t DM ha−1.
Observation Cassava RUE was much higher than previously observed in Africa.
Observation Mean storage root yield was 39 ± 7 t DM ha−1.
Observation Potential yields are greater than previously expected.
Observation Yield gaps are larger than previously expected.
Method / resource The model can adequately estimate storage root yield across major Nigerian cassava agroecologies under rainfed conditions.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf angle explained 36% of variation in canopy light extinction coefficient.

Taxon: sorghumSorghumt0
Organ / stage: Leaf anglee0
Outcome: variation in canopy light extinction coefficiente0
Value: 36%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Leaf angle explained 36% variation in canopy light extinction coefficient”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–467

t0
“sorghum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–40

Title

Genetic control of leaf angle in sorghum and its effect on light interception

Xiaoyu Zhi; Yongfu Tao; David Jordan; et al. Journal of Experimental Botany 2021. doi:10.1093/jxb/erab467

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Sorghum leaf angle varied widely and showed medium heritability.
Observation Guinea sorghum had the largest leaf angle.
Observation Durra sorghum had the smallest leaf angle.
Observation The genome wide association study detected 33 QTLs associated with sorghum leaf angle.
Association Seventy percent of sorghum leaf angle QTLs had synteny with previously detected maize QTLs within 10 cM.
Association Forty percent of sorghum leaf angle QTLs had synteny with previously detected rice QTLs within 10 cM.
Association The cross species QTL overlap was significantly enriched.
Association Prior maize and rice leaf angle candidate genes were enriched near sorghum QTLs.
Association The WD40 protein domain was enriched near sorghum leaf angle QTLs.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All cover crop treatments increased the light extinction coefficient in sunflower.

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: cover cropse0
Outcome: light extinction coefficiente0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78

e0
“In the all cover crops treatments, the light extinction coefficient was increased and weed cover percentage was reduced”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–880

Title

Effects of Some Cover Crops on Light Extinction and Weed Coverage in Sunflower Field

S. Hassannejad; A.R. Mobli Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 2014. doi:10.2478/cerce-2014-0014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect All cover crop treatments reduced weed cover percentage in sunflower.
Intervention effect Hairy vetch + rapeseed reduced total weed species by 61.92% compared with the weed-infested control.
Intervention effect Triticale + rapeseed reduced total weed species by 61.43% compared with the weed-infested control.
Intervention effect The best cover crop treatments were better than trifluralin herbicide application.
Recommendation The authors conclude that cover crops could be considered as integrated strategies for sustainable weed management.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These combinations had a smaller light extinction coefficient.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Outcome: light extinction coefficiente0
Direction: smallere0

Verbatim

e0
“a smaller light extinction coefficient resulted from the more erect leaf blades and longer flag leaves”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–451

t0
“Hybrid Rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79

Title

A Study on Characteristics of Photosynthesis in Super High-yielding Hybrid Rice

Liu Jianfeng; Yuan Longping; Qiyun Deng; et al. Zhongguo Nong ye ke xue = Zhongguo Nongye Kexue 2005

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Four rice combinations had higher grain weight per plant than Shanyou 63.
Observation These combinations had more erect leaf blades and longer flag leaves.
Observation Sink demand measured by spikelets per panicle increased significantly.
Observation Canopy photosynthesis during grain filling was higher.
Observation Flag leaf photosynthesis at saturating light was higher across stages.
Observation More dry matter accumulated in stems and sheaths before heading.
Observation Dry matter was efficiently transferred to grains after flowering.

“extinction coefficient of light”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics