View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Positive spacing difference was identified as the main factor affecting field planting uniformity .
field planting uniformity e0 increase of the positive difference of plant spacing e0 Verbatim
e0 “increase of the positive difference of plant spacing is the major effect factor in the field planting uniformity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1421 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hand planting with planting aids gave better planting uniformity than mechanical planters.
hand planting with planting aids e0 mechanical planters e0 Verbatim
e0 “hand planting with planting aids yields better uniformity than is obtained with mechanical planters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–334 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drip discharge variation and field emission uniformity were significantly better before planting than after.
difference in discharge qvar% and the absolute field emission uniformity FEUa% e0 after planting e0 Verbatim
t0 “yellow maize crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–169 e0 “the difference in discharge qvar% and the absolute field emission uniformity FEUa% were significantly better before planting compared to the values after planting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1882 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Manual and automatic control did not differ significantly in planting uniformity .
no significant difference e0 automatic control e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant difference in uniformity between manual and automatic control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–422 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
During warm conditions, deep planting enhanced emergence uniformity compared with shallow planting
emergence uniformity e4 During warm conditions e4 shallow planting e4 Verbatim
t0 “corn stand establishment and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–94 e4 “During warm conditions, deep planting enhanced emergence uniformity and rate (1.1 d less to reach 90% emergence than shallow planting ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1210 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The modified seeder achieved 98% uniformity in field evaluation.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The modified seeder was evaluated in the field and found that desired seed spacing (20 cm) and uniformity (98%) could be achieved. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–581 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (5) Association author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The author expects large yield variation within and between corn field s according to hybrid, planting date and uniformity .
hybrid selection e0 variation in yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “there will be large variation in yield within field s but also from one field to the next depending on hybrid selection, date of planting , and field uniformity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–516 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–15 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Uniformity can be calculated from deviation between actual and theoretical honeycombed planting distances.
uniformity of plant distribution e0 theoretical plant distance e0 Verbatim
e0 “the uniformity of plant distribution could be obtained by calculating the uniformity deviation coefficient between the actual planting distance and the theoretical plant distance derived from the honeycombed arrangement ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–756 t0 “Crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Honeycombed field arrangement was identified as the most uniform planting pattern.
most uniform planting pattern e0 Verbatim
e0 “Honeycombed arrangement of plants in the field is the most uniform planting pattern ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–239 t0 “Crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Pruning at field planting gave dwarf plants, strong stems, more lateral branches and fruits, and earlier, more uniform maturity.
tip pruning at field planting stage e0 dwarf,strong stem,more lateral branches,more fruits,early maturity,maturity uniformity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the pepper plants with tip pruning at field planting stage was of dwarf,strong stem,more lateral branches,more fruits,early maturity,maturity uniformity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–401 t0 “Qianla 3 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Zea mays subsp. mays