Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“fruit yields”

7,725 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 1,858 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 13 earlier · 1930s–1940s

Refine

More filters

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other viruses reduce fruit yields.

Taxon: Deciduous Fruit Treest0
Outcome: fruit yieldse0
Direction: reducee0

Not reportedInteractor

Verbatim

e0
“others reduce fruit yields”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–264

t0
“Deciduous Fruit Trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–76

Title

Virus/Mycoplasm Diseases and Certification Schemes for Deciduous Fruit Trees1)

A. F. Posnette EPPO Bulletin 1976. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2338.1976.tb02018.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Several fruit-tree diseases have identified causal agents, but many remain without known aetiology.
Observation Some prevalent viruses have little effect on certain rootstock and cultivar combinations.
Observation A few viruses can make orchards worthless.
Observation Virus-free clones have improved bud take.
Observation Virus-free clones have made nursery growth more even.
Observation Virus-free clones often yield more productive orchard trees.
Recommendation Insect-vectored plum pox will be difficult to control in nurseries when nearby plants harbor the virus.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing fruit load decreased yields.

Treatment: Reducing fruit loade0
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Reducing fruit load increased vegetative growth and decreased yields”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1145

Title

Effects of supplemental light duration on greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants and fruit yields

Dominique-André Demers; Martine Dorais; Chris H Wien; et al. Scientia Horticulturae 1998. doi:10.1016/s0304-4238(98)00097-1

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Extended photoperiods increased shoot fresh weight by 40–57%.
Intervention effect Extended photoperiods increased yields by 15–20%, without statistical significance.
Intervention effect Photoperiods beyond 14 h did not further improve growth and yields.
Observation Continuous light caused leaf chlorosis after seven weeks.
Intervention effect Continuous light improved early growth and yield relative to 14 h light.
Intervention effect Continuous light reduced growth rate later in the experiment.
Intervention effect At experiment end continuous light generally lowered total growth and yield relative to 14 h light.
Intervention effect Reducing fruit load increased vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Fruit load reduction did not change photoperiod response.
Intervention effect Photoperiod did not affect leaf mineral composition.
Intervention effect Continuous light increased leaf starch content.
Intervention effect Continuous light increased leaf sugar content.
Intervention effect Fruit pruning did not alter the carbohydrate response to photoperiod.
Intervention effect Fruit pruning did not affect onset or severity of continuous-light leaf chlorosis.
Mechanism The authors proposed leaf carbohydrate accumulation rather than sink limitation as the cause of continuous-light growth and yield reductions and chlorosis.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prediction accuracy for extra-large-sized and small-sized fruit yields exceeded that for total and red-colored fruit yields.

Taxon: fresh-market tomatot0
Outcome: prediction accuracies of the extra-large-sized fruit and small-sized fruit yieldse0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: total and red-colored fruit yieldse0

Verbatim

e0
“the prediction accuracies of the extra-large-sized fruit and small-sized fruit yields were higher than those of the total and red-colored fruit yields”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1348

t0
“fresh-market tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43

Title

Genetic architecture of fresh-market tomato yield

Prashant Bhandari; Juhee Kim; Tong Geon Lee BMC Plant Biology 2023. doi:10.1186/s12870-022-04018-5

Other claims from this paper (3)

Method / resource Genome-wide mapping identified 18 significant association signals for evaluated tomato traits.
Observation Ten association signals lay outside previously identified fruit size or shape regions.
Method / resource Using 364 SNPs identified by regularization improved accuracy in GEBV calculation.

Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit trees show alternating heavy and extremely light yields.

Taxon: fruit treese1
Outcome: heavy yields are followed by extremely light yieldse0

Verbatim

e0
“heavy yields are followed by extremely light yields, and vice versa.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–198

e1
“fruit trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–314

Title

Alternate bearing in fruit crops: Causes and solutions

H. L. Chaudhary; S. P. Chaudhari; P. M. Chaudhary International Journal of Agricultural Invention 2023. doi:10.46492/ijai/2023.8.1.16

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observation Alternate bearing is widespread among evergreen and deciduous fruit trees.
Observation Off year crops have low net returns for growers.
Observation Alternate bearing disrupts orchard maintenance cycles.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Regular yields are particularly aimed in stone fruit cultures.

Taxon: stone fruite1
Outcome: Regular yieldse1

Verbatim

e1
“Regular yields are particularly aimed in stone fruit cultures”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–597

Title

Training systems of fruit trees in Hungary

M. Soltész; Z. Szabó; J. Nyéki International Journal of Horticultural Science 2000. doi:10.31421/ijhs/6/1/82

Other claims from this paper (7)

Recommendation High-density apple and pear plantations are promoted for intense production in Hungary.
Observation Peach and plum trees are trained to funnel-shaped crowns.
Observation Apricots in Hungary are trained to an umbrella-type crown.
Observation Sweet and sour cherry training form is determined by the harvest technique.
Observation Red and black currants are grown mostly as bushes or hedgerows without support.
Observation Raspberries and blackberries are grown as hedges on trellis.
Observation Gooseberry is grown as grafted small trees attached to a wire-trellis.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Crop value analysis favored high yields of medium sized fruit over low yields of high quality fruit.

Taxon: Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
Outcome: producing high yields of medium size fruite0
Comparator: low yields of high quality fruite0

Verbatim

e0
“Crop value analyses suggest growers would be rewarded for producing high yields of medium size fruit (e.g., 21.5 to 25.4 mm) compared to low yields of high quality fruit.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1979

t0
“Sweet Cherry”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28

Title

Comparing Novel Sweet Cherry Crop Load Management Strategies

Matthew D. Whiting; David Ophardt HortScience 2005. doi:10.21273/hortsci.40.5.1271

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Thinning reduced fruit number by 38% to 49%.
Intervention effect Thinning reduced yield by 22% to 42%.
Intervention effect Thinning raised fruit weight by 8% to 26%.
Intervention effect Thinning raised fruit diameter by 2% to 10%.
Intervention effect Spur removal reduced yield by 42% on Gisela 5.
Intervention effect Blossom removal reduced yield by 22% on Gisela 5.
Intervention effect Spur removal reduced yield by 40% on Gisela 6.
Intervention effect Blossom removal reduced yield by 31% on Gisela 6.
Observation Gisela 5 rooted trees had greater fruit quality improvements than Gisela 6 rooted trees.
Intervention effect On Gisela 5, S and B produced 15% and 26% heavier fruit than control, respectively.
Intervention effect On Gisela 5, B produced 26% heavier fruit than control.
Intervention effect S increased yield of fruit at least 25.5 mm diameter by 240%, though yield was 1.5 kg/tree.
Intervention effect B increased yield of fruit at least 25.5 mm diameter by 880%, though yield was 5.2 kg/tree.
Intervention effect Neither thinning technique had a beneficial carryover effect.
Intervention effect In the following year S trees bore about 25% fewer fruit than B and C trees.
Observation Gisela 5 rooted trees bore about 15% fewer fruit than Gisela 6 in both years.
Observation Gisela 6 was 41% more productive than Gisela 5 without thinning.
Observation Gisela 6 was 46% more productive than Gisela 5 with S.
Observation Gisela 6 was 24% more productive than Gisela 5 with B.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly in total and marketable yields and fruit size.

Outcome: total yields, marketable yields, fruit sizee0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0
“significant differences in total yields, marketable yields, fruit size, and unmarketable yields”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1406

Title

Adaptability of Phytophthora capsici Resistant Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southern Georgia

Manisha Kumari; Bhabesh Dutta; Timothy Coolong; et al. HortTechnology 2024. doi:10.21273/horttech05425-24

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Root rot incidence was very low across the field trials.
Observation Cultivars differed significantly in unmarketable yields.
Recommendation PS 0994-1819, Paladin, and Mercer were recommended for fresh market growers based on marketable yields.
Recommendation Revolution was recommended for processor growers.
Observation Revolution had higher jumbo-sized fruit yields.
Observation Revolution had lower quality and higher pancaking in spring.
Observation Tarpon and Nitro had a more desirable disease-resistance package.
Observation Nitro had small fruit.
Observation Tarpon tended to have lower total yields than commercial standards.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spur-type trees had higher early fruit yields.

Taxon: appleMalus domesticae0 t0
Outcome: early fruit yieldse0 t0
Direction: highere0 t0

Verbatim

e0
“had higher early fruit yields”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–424

t0
“Apple”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63

Title

Variation in Micropropagated Trees of `Redspur Delicious' Apple

Richard H. Zimmerman HortScience 1995. doi:10.21273/hortsci.30.4.871

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Only four of 18 micropropagated trees had typical spur growth.
Observation Spur-type trees had significantly more spurs per shoot length.
Observation Spur-type trees flowered sooner.
Observation Spur-type trees remained significantly smaller after 13 years.
Observation Spur-type trees had significantly less cumulative yield.
Observation Recultured spur-type trees were uniform and all retained typical spur growth.
Observation Recultured trees had about 30% more spurs per meter than source trees.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach fruit yields were unaffected by treatment.

Outcome: Fruit yieldse0
Direction: not affectede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Fruit yields were not affected.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–738

Title

SOIL INJECTION OF BAS 111-06W REDUCES SHOOT GROWTH IN PEACH

Gregory L. Reighard HortScience 1992. doi:10.21273/hortsci.27.11.1168d

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Foliar BAS 111-06W caused severe leaf shotholing or bacteriosis in peach trees.
Intervention effect Soil shank treatment was the most effective application for controlling peach shoot growth.
Intervention effect Both 2 and 4 g soil shank treatments reduced peach shoot elongation by 10-34% annually.
Intervention effect Treated peach trees bloomed 1-2 days earlier than controls.
Intervention effect Treated peach trees had shorter bloom periods than controls.
Intervention effect Treated peach trees had greater flower bud density and flower number.
Intervention effect Treated peach trees required less summer and corrective winter pruning.
Intervention effect Treated peach trees had more short shoots to thin out.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrate production gave fruit yields comparable to conventional methods in 2010–2011.

Taxon: strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment: substratese0
Outcome: fruit yieldse0
Direction: comparablee0
Comparator: conventional methodse0

Verbatim

e0
“In the 2010–2011 strawberry production season, fruit yields on substrates were comparable to fruit yields using conventional methods.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–552

Title

TIF film, substrates and nonfumigant soil disinfestation maintain fruit yields

Steven A. Fennimore; Raquel Serohijos; Jayesh B. Samtani; et al. California Agriculture 2013. doi:10.3733/ca.v067n03p139

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observation Barrier films increased use while reducing fumigant emissions.
Intervention effect Anaerobic soil disinfestation gave fruit yields comparable to conventionally fumigated soils.
Intervention effect Steam disinfestation gave fruit yields comparable to conventionally fumigated soils.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“fruit yields”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics