View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increased leaf damage (33.4% leaf area loss) produced fewer flowers than natural leaf damage .
Treatmentincreased leaf damage treatment e1 Comparatornatural leaf damage plants e1 Verbatim
e0 “Oenothera macrocarpa (Onagraceae) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–742 e1 “Plants in the increased leaf damage treatment (33.4% leaf area loss) produced fewer flowers than natural leaf damage plants (6.5% leaf area loss) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1353 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf damage affected under 3% of accessions.
Verbatim
t0 “apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 e0 “(<3%) by leaf damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1048 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Prior leaf damage increased the probability of future leaf damage .
Outcomeprobability of leaf damage in succeeding years e0 Verbatim
e0 “Ramets that suffered leaf damage in 1 year experienced an increased probability of leaf damage in succeeding years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–520 t0 “Trientalis europaea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Artificial leaf damage did not reduce leaf -miner survival.
Interactorleaf-miner e0 pest Outcomeleaf-miner survival e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “leaf -miner survival was not reduced by leaf damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–648 t0 “Beech ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf damage reduced rosette size in the year of damage .
Qualifierthe year of damage e0 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf damage reduced rosette size the year of damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1263 e1 “Arabidopsis lyrata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–298 e2 “leaf (0 vs. 50% of the area of each leaf removed) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–688 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf damage and rotten wood were the most common types of tree damage .
Outcomeleaf damage and rotten wood e0 QualifierThe most types of tree damage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The most types of tree damage were leaf damage and rotten wood ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1082 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbivore attack following artificial leaf damage decreased with increasing initial leaf damage .
Treatmentinitial leaf damage e5 Interactorherbivore e5 herbivore Outcomeherbivore attack e5 Verbatim
t0 “Quercus mongolica var. grosseserrata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–102 e5 “As a result, herbivore attack following artificial leaf damage decreased with increasing initial leaf damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–958 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean variety affected leaf damage , pod damage and production.
Outcomeleaf damage, pod damage, and production e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 e0 “Results indicated that variety affects pest diversity and abundance, however, it affected leaf damage , pod damage , and production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–895 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Overall tomato flower damage was lower than leaf damage .
Verbatim
e0 “Overall flower damage was lower than leaf damage . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1405 t0 “Solanum lycopersicum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Simulated early leaf damage reduced damage by subsequent leaf -chewing insects on wild cotton.
Treatmentsimulated early leaf damage e1 Interactorleaf‐chewing insects e1 herbivore Outcomedamage by subsequent leaf‐chewing insects e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wild cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–127 e1 “simulated early leaf damage reduced damage by subsequent leaf ‐chewing insects, increased plant fungal infections, but did not affect ant abundance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1048 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.