Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“magnitude of decrease”

7 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 1 non-evaluative

Over time

2000 ’10

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: winter wheat ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The magnitude of the decrease caused by waterlogging after booting stage became larger as the wheat plant developed.

Taxon: Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: After booting stage, waterlogginge3
Outcome: magnitude of the decreasee3
Direction: became largere3
Qualifier: with the progress of the growth and development of the wheat plante3

Verbatim

t0
“the Root System of Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95

e3
“After booting stage, waterlogging would invariably cause pronounced decrease of these characters, and the magnitude of the decrease became larger with the progress of the growth and development of the wheat plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–770

Title

Effect of Waterlogging on the Growth and Nutrient Metabolism of the Root System of Winter Wheat

Zhou Su ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2001

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Short-term waterlogging before the booting stage increased secondary root production in the top soil of winter wheat.
Intervention effect Short-term waterlogging before the booting stage increased N content and the proportion of N distributed to the root system of winter wheat.
Intervention effect Short-term waterlogging before the booting stage increased soluble sugar content in the root system of winter wheat.
Intervention effect Short-term waterlogging before the booting stage elevated the C/N ratio of winter wheat.
Intervention effect Prolonged waterlogging decreased all these attributes of winter wheat.
Intervention effect After booting stage, waterlogging caused a pronounced decrease of these characters in winter wheat.
Intervention effect Prolonged waterlogging decreased biomass, N accumulation and P accumulation of the winter wheat root system at all growth stages.
Intervention effect Prolonged waterlogging decreased P content and P proportion of the winter wheat root system at all growth stages.
Intervention effect Waterlogging for 5 days at the filling stage seriously handicapped the growth and metabolism of the wheat root system.
Intervention effect Waterlogging for 10 days at the filling stage reduced N and P accumulation of winter wheat roots to more than half of normal.

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scab infestation comparably decreased kernel mass and volume.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: mass and volumee0
Direction: relative decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“comparable magnitude of relative decrease (due to infestation) of two features (mass and volume)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–468

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–64

Title

Evaluation of single-kernel density of scab-damaged winter wheat

A. Grabowski; R. Siuda; L. Lenc; et al. International Agrophysics 2012. doi:10.2478/v10247-012-0019-5

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect Scab damaged wheat grain did not have lower mean single kernel density than healthy grain.
Method / resource Liquid pycnometry may overestimate scabby kernel volume through surface tension.
Method / resource Consequently, scabby kernel density can be significantly underestimated.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After booting stage, waterlogging caused a pronounced decrease of these characters in winter wheat.

Taxon: Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: After booting stage, waterlogginge3
Outcome: these characterse3
Direction: pronounced decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“the Root System of Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95

e3
“After booting stage, waterlogging would invariably cause pronounced decrease of these characters, and the magnitude of the decrease became larger with the progress of the growth and development of the wheat plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–770

Title

Effect of Waterlogging on the Growth and Nutrient Metabolism of the Root System of Winter Wheat

Zhou Su ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2001

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Short-term waterlogging before the booting stage increased secondary root production in the top soil of winter wheat.
Intervention effect Short-term waterlogging before the booting stage increased N content and the proportion of N distributed to the root system of winter wheat.
Intervention effect Short-term waterlogging before the booting stage increased soluble sugar content in the root system of winter wheat.
Intervention effect Short-term waterlogging before the booting stage elevated the C/N ratio of winter wheat.
Intervention effect Prolonged waterlogging decreased all these attributes of winter wheat.
Association The magnitude of the decrease caused by waterlogging after booting stage became larger as the wheat plant developed.
Intervention effect Prolonged waterlogging decreased biomass, N accumulation and P accumulation of the winter wheat root system at all growth stages.
Intervention effect Prolonged waterlogging decreased P content and P proportion of the winter wheat root system at all growth stages.
Intervention effect Waterlogging for 5 days at the filling stage seriously handicapped the growth and metabolism of the wheat root system.
Intervention effect Waterlogging for 10 days at the filling stage reduced N and P accumulation of winter wheat roots to more than half of normal.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interaction effects on grain Zn were much smaller than the average treatment increases.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: magnitude of the increase/decrease in grain Zne0
Direction: much lesse0
Value: -3.96~5.71 mg kg-1e0
Comparator: foliar Zn-only treatmente0

Verbatim

e0
“the magnitude of the increase/decrease in grain Zn (-3.96~5.71 mg kg-1) due to these interactions was much less than the average increases following Zn+K (31.3), Zn+P (18.7), and Zn+N (26.5 mg kg-1) treatments relative to that observed in foliar Zn-only treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1542

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97

Title

Effects of Zn, macronutrients, and their interactions through foliar applications on winter wheat grain nutritional quality

Shaoxia Wang; Meng Li; Ke Liu; et al. PLoS ONE 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181276

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Foliar Zn alone increased grain Zn concentration by 95.7% across six site-years.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with N increased grain Zn concentration by 101%.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with P increased grain Zn concentration by 67.9%.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with K increased grain Zn concentration by 121%.
Association Foliar Zn interacted positively with N for increasing grain Zn at Sanyuan.
Association Foliar Zn interacted positively with K for increasing grain Zn at Yangling.
Association Foliar Zn interacted negatively with P for increasing grain Zn under all tested conditions.
Intervention effect Zn plus K increased grain Zn by an average 31.3 relative to foliar Zn alone.
Intervention effect Zn plus P increased grain Zn by an average 18.7 relative to foliar Zn alone.
Intervention effect Zn plus N increased grain Zn by an average 26.5 mg kg-1 relative to foliar Zn alone.
Intervention effect Combining foliar Zn with N, P or K did not adversely affect grain yield and other nutritional quality.
Intervention effect Combined foliar nutrient applications slightly increased grain yield in some cases.
Intervention effect Combined foliar nutrient applications slightly increased grain macronutrient concentrations in some cases.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 52.0% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus N lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 53.1% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus P lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 43.4% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus K lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 63.5% versus control.
Observation These treatment effects were consistent across four years and three soil N rates.
Recommendation The authors prefer including Zn in foliar N or K applications for dietary Zn intake.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus K increased grain Zn by an average 31.3 relative to foliar Zn alone.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Zn+Ke0
Outcome: grain Zne1
Direction: increasese0
Value: 31.3e0
Comparator: foliar Zn-only treatmente0

Verbatim

e0
“average increases following Zn+K (31.3), Zn+P (18.7), and Zn+N (26.5 mg kg-1) treatments relative to that observed in foliar Zn-only treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1542

e1
“magnitude of the increase/decrease in grain Zn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1329

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97

Title

Effects of Zn, macronutrients, and their interactions through foliar applications on winter wheat grain nutritional quality

Shaoxia Wang; Meng Li; Ke Liu; et al. PLoS ONE 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181276

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Foliar Zn alone increased grain Zn concentration by 95.7% across six site-years.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with N increased grain Zn concentration by 101%.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with P increased grain Zn concentration by 67.9%.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with K increased grain Zn concentration by 121%.
Association Foliar Zn interacted positively with N for increasing grain Zn at Sanyuan.
Association Foliar Zn interacted positively with K for increasing grain Zn at Yangling.
Association Foliar Zn interacted negatively with P for increasing grain Zn under all tested conditions.
Observation Interaction effects on grain Zn were much smaller than the average treatment increases.
Intervention effect Zn plus P increased grain Zn by an average 18.7 relative to foliar Zn alone.
Intervention effect Zn plus N increased grain Zn by an average 26.5 mg kg-1 relative to foliar Zn alone.
Intervention effect Combining foliar Zn with N, P or K did not adversely affect grain yield and other nutritional quality.
Intervention effect Combined foliar nutrient applications slightly increased grain yield in some cases.
Intervention effect Combined foliar nutrient applications slightly increased grain macronutrient concentrations in some cases.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 52.0% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus N lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 53.1% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus P lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 43.4% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus K lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 63.5% versus control.
Observation These treatment effects were consistent across four years and three soil N rates.
Recommendation The authors prefer including Zn in foliar N or K applications for dietary Zn intake.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus P increased grain Zn by an average 18.7 relative to foliar Zn alone.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Zn+Pe0
Outcome: grain Zne1
Direction: increasese0
Value: 18.7e0
Comparator: foliar Zn-only treatmente0

Verbatim

e0
“average increases following Zn+K (31.3), Zn+P (18.7), and Zn+N (26.5 mg kg-1) treatments relative to that observed in foliar Zn-only treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1542

e1
“magnitude of the increase/decrease in grain Zn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1329

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97

Title

Effects of Zn, macronutrients, and their interactions through foliar applications on winter wheat grain nutritional quality

Shaoxia Wang; Meng Li; Ke Liu; et al. PLoS ONE 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181276

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Foliar Zn alone increased grain Zn concentration by 95.7% across six site-years.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with N increased grain Zn concentration by 101%.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with P increased grain Zn concentration by 67.9%.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with K increased grain Zn concentration by 121%.
Association Foliar Zn interacted positively with N for increasing grain Zn at Sanyuan.
Association Foliar Zn interacted positively with K for increasing grain Zn at Yangling.
Association Foliar Zn interacted negatively with P for increasing grain Zn under all tested conditions.
Observation Interaction effects on grain Zn were much smaller than the average treatment increases.
Intervention effect Zn plus K increased grain Zn by an average 31.3 relative to foliar Zn alone.
Intervention effect Zn plus N increased grain Zn by an average 26.5 mg kg-1 relative to foliar Zn alone.
Intervention effect Combining foliar Zn with N, P or K did not adversely affect grain yield and other nutritional quality.
Intervention effect Combined foliar nutrient applications slightly increased grain yield in some cases.
Intervention effect Combined foliar nutrient applications slightly increased grain macronutrient concentrations in some cases.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 52.0% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus N lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 53.1% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus P lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 43.4% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus K lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 63.5% versus control.
Observation These treatment effects were consistent across four years and three soil N rates.
Recommendation The authors prefer including Zn in foliar N or K applications for dietary Zn intake.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn plus N increased grain Zn by an average 26.5 mg kg-1 relative to foliar Zn alone.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Zn+Ne0
Outcome: grain Zne1
Direction: increasese0
Value: 26.5 mg kg-1e0
Comparator: foliar Zn-only treatmente0

Verbatim

e0
“average increases following Zn+K (31.3), Zn+P (18.7), and Zn+N (26.5 mg kg-1) treatments relative to that observed in foliar Zn-only treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1542

e1
“magnitude of the increase/decrease in grain Zn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1329

t0
“winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97

Title

Effects of Zn, macronutrients, and their interactions through foliar applications on winter wheat grain nutritional quality

Shaoxia Wang; Meng Li; Ke Liu; et al. PLoS ONE 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181276

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Foliar Zn alone increased grain Zn concentration by 95.7% across six site-years.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with N increased grain Zn concentration by 101%.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with P increased grain Zn concentration by 67.9%.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn with K increased grain Zn concentration by 121%.
Association Foliar Zn interacted positively with N for increasing grain Zn at Sanyuan.
Association Foliar Zn interacted positively with K for increasing grain Zn at Yangling.
Association Foliar Zn interacted negatively with P for increasing grain Zn under all tested conditions.
Observation Interaction effects on grain Zn were much smaller than the average treatment increases.
Intervention effect Zn plus K increased grain Zn by an average 31.3 relative to foliar Zn alone.
Intervention effect Zn plus P increased grain Zn by an average 18.7 relative to foliar Zn alone.
Intervention effect Combining foliar Zn with N, P or K did not adversely affect grain yield and other nutritional quality.
Intervention effect Combined foliar nutrient applications slightly increased grain yield in some cases.
Intervention effect Combined foliar nutrient applications slightly increased grain macronutrient concentrations in some cases.
Intervention effect Foliar Zn lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 52.0% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus N lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 53.1% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus P lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 43.4% versus control.
Intervention effect Zn plus K lowered grain phytic acid:Zn molar ratios by 63.5% versus control.
Observation These treatment effects were consistent across four years and three soil N rates.
Recommendation The authors prefer including Zn in foliar N or K applications for dietary Zn intake.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“magnitude of decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics