Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“present”

107,559 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 78,080 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 874 earlier · 1780s–1940s

Refine

More filters

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fecal coliforms were always present because cattle were present year-round.

Taxon: Bromegrasst0
Outcome: fecal coliforms were always presente0
Qualifier: cattle were present all year arounde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Since cattle were present all year around fecal coliforms were always present”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3557–3634

t0
“Bromegrass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31

Title

Forage Production of Bromegrass Under Intensive Management with Applications to Vegetated Treatment Areas in the Northern Great Plains

Zamy, Ronade Martine Open PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University) 2009

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation Smooth bromegrass had greater initial forage growth than meadow or hybrid bromegrass in 2005.
Observation Meadow and smooth bromegrass had similar production at anthesis in 2006 and 2007.
Observation Meadow bromegrass had greater regrowth than smooth or hybrid bromegrass.
Observation Meadow bromegrass showed greater potential for high-quality forage across multiple harvests than smooth or hybrid bromegrass.
Observation Smooth bromegrass forage production was 4.5 Mg ha-1 under one harvest in 2006.
Observation Smooth bromegrass forage production was 8.5 Mg ha- 1 under three harvests in 2006.
Observation Bromegrass removed 83 kg ha- 1 N with one harvest.
Observation Bromegrass removed 8 kg ha- 1 P with one harvest.
Observation Bromegrass removed 193 kg ha- 1 N with three harvests.
Observation Bromegrass removed 22 kg ha- 1 P with three harvests.
Intervention effect Grass filtration greatly decreased fecal coliform numbers, often to 200 per 100 ml.
Association Water contamination occurred when a fecal-bacteria source was present.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later harvesting increased K present.

Taxon: sugar beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: Increasing harvesting datee0
Outcome: K presente0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Increasing harvesting date increased K present, sucrose present, extractable present, QZ present, purity present, extractability present but reduced alpha - amino N present, Na present and sugar lost to molasses in the second season.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1040

t0
“sugar beets”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64

Title

Evaluation of chemical composition of roots of three sugar beets varieties growing under different water deficit and harvesting dates in Upper Egypt

Omar M. Yassin; Saleh M. Ismail; M.A. Gameh; et al. Current Chemistry Letters 2021. doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2021.11.003

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced K present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased purity present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased purity present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable sucrose, extractable content and QZ, higher than SV1841.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable purity and extractability, higher than SV1841.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later harvesting increased sucrose present.

Taxon: sugar beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: Increasing harvesting datee0
Outcome: sucrose presente0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Increasing harvesting date increased K present, sucrose present, extractable present, QZ present, purity present, extractability present but reduced alpha - amino N present, Na present and sugar lost to molasses in the second season.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1040

t0
“sugar beets”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64

Title

Evaluation of chemical composition of roots of three sugar beets varieties growing under different water deficit and harvesting dates in Upper Egypt

Omar M. Yassin; Saleh M. Ismail; M.A. Gameh; et al. Current Chemistry Letters 2021. doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2021.11.003

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced K present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased purity present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased K present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased purity present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable sucrose, extractable content and QZ, higher than SV1841.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable purity and extractability, higher than SV1841.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later harvesting increased extractable present.

Taxon: sugar beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: Increasing harvesting datee0
Outcome: extractable presente0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Increasing harvesting date increased K present, sucrose present, extractable present, QZ present, purity present, extractability present but reduced alpha - amino N present, Na present and sugar lost to molasses in the second season.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1040

t0
“sugar beets”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64

Title

Evaluation of chemical composition of roots of three sugar beets varieties growing under different water deficit and harvesting dates in Upper Egypt

Omar M. Yassin; Saleh M. Ismail; M.A. Gameh; et al. Current Chemistry Letters 2021. doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2021.11.003

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced K present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased purity present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased K present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased purity present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable sucrose, extractable content and QZ, higher than SV1841.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable purity and extractability, higher than SV1841.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later harvesting increased QZ present.

Taxon: sugar beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: Increasing harvesting datee0
Outcome: QZ presente0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Increasing harvesting date increased K present, sucrose present, extractable present, QZ present, purity present, extractability present but reduced alpha - amino N present, Na present and sugar lost to molasses in the second season.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1040

t0
“sugar beets”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64

Title

Evaluation of chemical composition of roots of three sugar beets varieties growing under different water deficit and harvesting dates in Upper Egypt

Omar M. Yassin; Saleh M. Ismail; M.A. Gameh; et al. Current Chemistry Letters 2021. doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2021.11.003

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced K present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased purity present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased K present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased purity present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable sucrose, extractable content and QZ, higher than SV1841.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable purity and extractability, higher than SV1841.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later harvesting increased purity present.

Taxon: sugar beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: Increasing harvesting datee0
Outcome: purity presente0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Increasing harvesting date increased K present, sucrose present, extractable present, QZ present, purity present, extractability present but reduced alpha - amino N present, Na present and sugar lost to molasses in the second season.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1040

t0
“sugar beets”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64

Title

Evaluation of chemical composition of roots of three sugar beets varieties growing under different water deficit and harvesting dates in Upper Egypt

Omar M. Yassin; Saleh M. Ismail; M.A. Gameh; et al. Current Chemistry Letters 2021. doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2021.11.003

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced K present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased purity present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased K present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable sucrose, extractable content and QZ, higher than SV1841.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable purity and extractability, higher than SV1841.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later harvesting increased extractability present.

Taxon: sugar beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: Increasing harvesting datee0
Outcome: extractability presente0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Increasing harvesting date increased K present, sucrose present, extractable present, QZ present, purity present, extractability present but reduced alpha - amino N present, Na present and sugar lost to molasses in the second season.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1040

t0
“sugar beets”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64

Title

Evaluation of chemical composition of roots of three sugar beets varieties growing under different water deficit and harvesting dates in Upper Egypt

Omar M. Yassin; Saleh M. Ismail; M.A. Gameh; et al. Current Chemistry Letters 2021. doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2021.11.003

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced K present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased purity present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased K present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased purity present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable sucrose, extractable content and QZ, higher than SV1841.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable purity and extractability, higher than SV1841.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later harvesting reduced Na present.

Taxon: sugar beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: Increasing harvesting datee0
Outcome: Na presente0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Increasing harvesting date increased K present, sucrose present, extractable present, QZ present, purity present, extractability present but reduced alpha - amino N present, Na present and sugar lost to molasses in the second season.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1040

t0
“sugar beets”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64

Title

Evaluation of chemical composition of roots of three sugar beets varieties growing under different water deficit and harvesting dates in Upper Egypt

Omar M. Yassin; Saleh M. Ismail; M.A. Gameh; et al. Current Chemistry Letters 2021. doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2021.11.003

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced K present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased purity present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased K present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased purity present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable sucrose, extractable content and QZ, higher than SV1841.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable purity and extractability, higher than SV1841.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sampled epiphytes contained flavonoids, saponins, alkaloids and tannins at present or moderately present levels.

Taxon: epiphytese0
Outcome: flavonoids, saponins, alkaloids and tanins were either present or moderately presente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“flavonoids, saponins, alkaloids and tanins were either present or moderately present in each of the epiphytes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1079

Title

Investigation of the Phytochemical Constituents of Diverse Epiphytes in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria

Ezejiofor, F.U.C.; Ndana, R.W.; Ogunlade-Anibasa, G.O.; et al. Asian Journal of Biology 2025. doi:10.9734/ajob/2025/v21i1475

Other claims from this paper (2)

Observation Calyptechium emerginatum had the highest flavonoid content, 52.61.
Observation Entodontpsis nitens had the lowest flavonoid content, 4.29.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later harvesting reduced alpha - amino N present.

Taxon: sugar beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: Increasing harvesting datee0
Outcome: alpha - amino N presente0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Increasing harvesting date increased K present, sucrose present, extractable present, QZ present, purity present, extractability present but reduced alpha - amino N present, Na present and sugar lost to molasses in the second season.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1040

t0
“sugar beets”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64

Title

Evaluation of chemical composition of roots of three sugar beets varieties growing under different water deficit and harvesting dates in Upper Egypt

Omar M. Yassin; Saleh M. Ismail; M.A. Gameh; et al. Current Chemistry Letters 2021. doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2021.11.003

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced alpha - amino N present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced K present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased purity present.
Intervention effect Reducing water supply increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased K present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased sucrose present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractable present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased QZ present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased purity present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting increased extractability present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced Na present.
Intervention effect Later harvesting reduced sugar lost to molasses.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable sucrose, extractable content and QZ, higher than SV1841.
Observation RAVEL and SA1686 had comparable purity and extractability, higher than SV1841.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“present”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics