View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The evaluation identified one highly resistant , 12 resistant , six medium resistant and one weak resistant variety.
1 highly resistant, 12 resistant, 6 medium resistant and 1 weak resistant variety e0 Verbatim
e0 “there were identified 1 highly resistant , 12 resistant , 6 medium resistant and 1 weak resistant variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1695 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In vitro screening found eight genotypes highly resistant , three resistant and seven moderately resistant .
highly resistant, 3 resistant and 7 as moderately resistant e0 Verbatim
e0 “eight genotypes were highly resistant , 3 resistant and 7 as moderately resistant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–765 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Season 1 classifications numbered 48 highly resistant , 31 resistant , and 25 moderately resistant .
highly resistant (48), resistant (31), moderately resistant (25) e0 Verbatim
e0 “highly resistant (48), resistant (31), moderately resistant (25) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–863 t0 “Sesame ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation Season 1 leaf damage ranged from 0% to 97.96%. Observation PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 were pest-free in season 1. Observation PI 170726 had 97.96% damage in season 1. Observation Season 1 classifications included 13 susceptible and 15 highly susceptible accessions. Observation Season 2 leaf damage ranged from 0% to 97.30%. Observation Five named accessions were pest-free in season 2. Observation PI 170726 again had highest damage, 97.30%, in season 2. Observation Season 2 classifications numbered 35 highly resistant, 36 resistant, and 33 moderately resistant. Observation Season 2 included 12 susceptible and 16 highly susceptible accessions. Observation Combined analysis classified 28 highly resistant, 54 resistant, and 21 moderately resistant accessions. Observation Combined analysis classified 11 susceptible and 18 highly susceptible accessions. Observation PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 were damage-free in both seasons and the combined analysis, and designated highly resistant. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Season 2 classifications numbered 35 highly resistant , 36 resistant , and 33 moderately resistant .
highly resistant (35), resistant (36), moderately resistant (33) e0 Verbatim
e0 “highly resistant (35), resistant (36), moderately resistant (33) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1186 t0 “Sesame ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation Season 1 leaf damage ranged from 0% to 97.96%. Observation PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 were pest-free in season 1. Observation PI 170726 had 97.96% damage in season 1. Observation Season 1 classifications numbered 48 highly resistant, 31 resistant, and 25 moderately resistant. Observation Season 1 classifications included 13 susceptible and 15 highly susceptible accessions. Observation Season 2 leaf damage ranged from 0% to 97.30%. Observation Five named accessions were pest-free in season 2. Observation PI 170726 again had highest damage, 97.30%, in season 2. Observation Season 2 included 12 susceptible and 16 highly susceptible accessions. Observation Combined analysis classified 28 highly resistant, 54 resistant, and 21 moderately resistant accessions. Observation Combined analysis classified 11 susceptible and 18 highly susceptible accessions. Observation PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 were damage-free in both seasons and the combined analysis, and designated highly resistant. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Combined analysis classified 28 highly resistant , 54 resistant , and 21 moderately resistant accessions.
highly resistant (28), resistant (54), moderately resistant (21) e0 Verbatim
e0 “highly resistant (28), resistant (54), moderately resistant (21) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1371 t0 “Sesame ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation Season 1 leaf damage ranged from 0% to 97.96%. Observation PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 were pest-free in season 1. Observation PI 170726 had 97.96% damage in season 1. Observation Season 1 classifications numbered 48 highly resistant, 31 resistant, and 25 moderately resistant. Observation Season 1 classifications included 13 susceptible and 15 highly susceptible accessions. Observation Season 2 leaf damage ranged from 0% to 97.30%. Observation Five named accessions were pest-free in season 2. Observation PI 170726 again had highest damage, 97.30%, in season 2. Observation Season 2 classifications numbered 35 highly resistant, 36 resistant, and 33 moderately resistant. Observation Season 2 included 12 susceptible and 16 highly susceptible accessions. Observation Combined analysis classified 11 susceptible and 18 highly susceptible accessions. Observation PI 170757, PI 223014, and PI 285170 were damage-free in both seasons and the combined analysis, and designated highly resistant. Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hybrids from resistant or moderately resistant sorghum parents were highly shootfly resistant .
Hybrids involving resistant or moderately resistant parents e0 highly resistant e0 Verbatim
e0 “Hybrids involving resistant or moderately resistant parents were highly resistant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–407 t0 “Shootfly Resistance in Sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–52 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
One resistant by resistant cross yielded 32.2% resistant seedlings.
resistant seedlings e0 Verbatim
t0 “Strawberry Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–26 e0 “Two resistant × resistant crosses were made in 2009, yielding 32.2 and 32.7% resistant seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1193 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
One Mississippi resistant biotype was two- to fourfold more resistant than other resistant biotypes.
more resistant e0 other resistant biotypes e0 Verbatim
e0 “One resistant biotype from Mississippi was two- to fourfold more resistant than other resistant biotypes. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–816 t0 “horseweed ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 21–30 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The other resistant by resistant cross yielded 32.7% resistant seedlings.
resistant seedlings e0 Verbatim
t0 “Strawberry Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–26 e0 “Two resistant × resistant crosses were made in 2009, yielding 32.2 and 32.7% resistant seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1193 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Resistant by resistant sweet corn crosses gave nearly fully resistant progenies.
Resistant X resistant crosses e0 nearly fully resistant progenies e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Resistant X resistant crosses gave nearly fully resistant progenies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–440 t0 “sweet corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Solanum lycopersicum
Sesamum indicum
Sorghum_single2.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Fragaria
Erigeron canadensis