View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Survival rate did not differ significantly among pretreatments.
Comparatortreatment means e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the survival rate was not statistically significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1109 e1 “among treatment means on germination, seed ling height, and root collar diameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1050 t0 “Senna spectabilis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–97 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Experimental warming did not significantly change the seed ling survival rate of Pinus densiflora .
Treatmentexperimental warming e4 Outcomeseedling survival rate e4 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e4 “seed ling survival rate of P. densiflora showed no significant difference by experimental warming ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1471 t1 “Open-field Experimental Warming Using the Infrared Lamp ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–143 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed survival did not differ significantly between substrates.
TaxonVALLISNERIA SPIRALIS L. t0 Directiondid not differ e0 Verbatim
e0 “but its survive rate did not differ significantly between the two substrates under undisturbed condition. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3710–3815 t0 “VALLISNERIA SPIRALIS L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–102 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf retention surface size had no significant effect on survival or growth.
Treatmentleaf retention surface size e0 Outcomesurvival rate and growth e0 Directiondidn't influence e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The leaf retention surface size didn't influence significantly on the survival rate and growth. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1053 t0 “Camellia oleifera ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chronic irradiation did not significantly decrease Plantago major progeny survival .
Treatmentchronic irradiation e0 Directiondid not cause a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The se relatively low levels of chronic irradiation did not cause a significant decrease in the survival rate of P. major seed progeny ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–575 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Low rate CGA 48988 pellets did not significantly increase field survival and yield.
Outcomeplant survival and yield e0 Directiondid not significantly increase e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e7 “root and stalk rot of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) caused by Phytophthora megasperma Drechs. var. sojae Hildebr. (Pms) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–157 e0 “Captan and CGA 48988 applied to Harosoy 63 seed s (at 0.13 and 0.33 g a.i./kg of seed , respectively) by a pelleting technique gave short-term control in the greenhouse, but did not significantly increase plant survival and yield in the field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–937 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the second year, soil moisture and germination timing had no effect on relative growth rate .
Treatmentmoisture conditions e4 Outcomerelative growth rate e4 Directionno_change inferred e4 Qualifierin the second year e4 Verbatim
e0 “The two-year survival and growth of seed lings of Magnolia stellata were monitored at a site following clearcutting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 e4 “in the second year, no effects of the moisture conditions or germination timing on the relative growth rate were detected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–706 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Burial no significant impact mortality rate in remaining six species.
TaxonCommon Plants in Subalpine Wet Meadows t0 Materialsurvival-insensitive type e0 Treatmentin situ burial at a 15 cm depth (for seven months) e1 Directionno significant impact e0 Valueremaining six species e0 Verbatim
t0 “Common Plants in Subalpine Wet Meadows ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–108 e0 “Compared with the control, the burial treatment significantly increased the germination rate s of four species (burial-promoted germination type), while no significant effect was observed on the germination of the remaining eight species (burial-insensitive germination type); it significantly increased the mortality rate of two species ( survival -inhibited type), significantly decreased the mortality rate of four speci… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1498 e1 “in situ burial at a 15 cm depth (for seven months) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–730 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Burial no significant effect germination in remaining eight species.
TaxonCommon Plants in Subalpine Wet Meadows t0 Materialburial-insensitive germination type e0 Treatmentin situ burial at a 15 cm depth (for seven months) e1 Directionno significant effect e0 Valueremaining eight species e0 Verbatim
t0 “Common Plants in Subalpine Wet Meadows ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–108 e0 “Compared with the control, the burial treatment significantly increased the germination rate s of four species (burial-promoted germination type), while no significant effect was observed on the germination of the remaining eight species (burial-insensitive germination type); it significantly increased the mortality rate of two species ( survival -inhibited type), significantly decreased the mortality rate of four speci… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1498 e1 “in situ burial at a 15 cm depth (for seven months) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–730 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.