Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The system significantly improved protoplast yield over the previous system.

Outcome
protoplast yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
previous systeme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the previous system, this system significantly improved protoplast yield and transformation efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1057

Title

Establishment of a High-Efficiency Protoplast Isolation and Transient Transformation System for Chrysanthemum Petals

Yanfei Li; Min Lu; Jiaying Wang; et al. Horticulturae 2026. doi:10.3390/horticulturae12040425

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce yield in the organic (ORG) system increased over years relative to the conventional (CON) system.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
ORG systeme1
Outcome
Lettuce yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
over yearse1
Comparator
CON systeme1

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce yield in the ORG system increased over years relative to the CON system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1216

Title

Summer Cover Crop and Management System affect Lettuce and Cantaloupe Production System

Guangyao Wang; Mathieu Ngouajio; Milton E. McGiffen; et al. Agronomy Journal 2008. doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0012

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield was unaffected by tillage system.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
tillage systeme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soybean yield was not affected by the tillage system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1238

Title

Soybean macronutrient availability and yield as affected by tillage system

Silvino Guimarães Moreira; Jorge de Castro Kiehl; Luís Ignácio Prochnow; et al. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy 2019. doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.42973

Other claims from this paper (5)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

System yield depended on maize yield.

Treatment
maize yielde0
Outcome
yield of the intercropped pea/maize systeme0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“yield of the intercropped pea/maize system was dependent on maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–873
t0

“pea/maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–49

Title

Effect of maize row spacing on yield of pea/maize intercropping system

Zhao Jian Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao 2012

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The non-ratoon system was superior to the ratoon system in total rice yield.

Treatment
non-ratoon systeme0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
ratoon systeme0

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14
e0

“the ratoon system improving grain quality, while the non-ratoon system was superior in total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1197

Title

Enhancing rice yield potential on cadmium contaminated soils through sorghum and mycorrhiza integration

Puji Harsono; Nur Azizah Uswatun Hasanah; Edi Purwanto; et al. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2025. doi:10.31018/jans.v17i4.6851

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The BC + DC system gave lower grain yield than the DC system.

Treatment
BC + DC systeme1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
DC systeme1

Verbatim

e1

“For all traits employed to evaluate green corn yield, the GC system provided higher yields than the BC + GC system. The BC + DC system provided lower grain yield than the DC system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–979

Title

Effects of nitrogen application on corn yield after harvesting the apical ear as baby corn

Paulo Sérgio L Silva; Bernardo B Araújo Júnior; Vianney R Oliveira; et al. Horticultura Brasileira 2013. doi:10.1590/s0102-05362013000300012

Other claims from this paper (7)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A strong root system was identified as a key factor in yield.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Organ / stage
root systeme0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Strong root system was also the key factor on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–933
t0

“root system and rapeseed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–78

Title

Effects of direct drilling and transplanting on root system and rapeseed yield

Yuan Jin-zha Zhongguo youliao zuowu xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato tuber yield in the organic system was approximately 44% lower than in the conventional system.

Treatment
organic systeme0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
approx. 44%e0
Comparator
conventional systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“the tuber yield in the organic system was approx. 44% lower than the tuber yield in the conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–929
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70

Title

Organic system vs. conventional – a Bayesian analysis of Polish potato post-registration trials

M. Przystalski; T. Lenartowicz The Journal of Agricultural Science 2023. doi:10.1017/s0021859623000084

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

System yield was 51.79% higher with treatment T3W3 than with T3W4 in the cotton–maize system.

Taxon
Cotton–MaizeGossypium hirsutumZea mayst0
Treatment
T3W3e2
Outcome
system yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
51.79%e2
Comparator
T3W4e2

Verbatim

e2

“The system yield was 51.79% higher with the adoption of T3W3 compared to T3W4 combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2162–2252
t0

“Cotton–Maize System Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–80

Title

Impact of Conservation Agriculture on Soil Quality and Cotton–Maize System Yield in Semi-Arid India

Knight Nthebere; RamPrakash Tata; Padmaja Bhimireddy; et al. Sustainability 2025. doi:10.3390/su17030978

Other claims from this paper (2)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The upgraded system evaluated in 2003 increased simulated crop yield over the earlier system.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
system was upgraded in 2002e0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The system was upgraded in 2002 and the simulations undertaken using the 2003 system evaluation data showed increases in crop yield, water use and profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1370
e1

“simulate sugarcane yield and water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–499

Title

Benefits from performing irrigation system evaluations.

G. W. Ascough; N. L. Lecler http://www.sasta.co.za/wp-content/uploads/Proceedings/2000s/2004_ascough_BENEFITS FROM PERFORMING IRRIGATION .pdf 2004

Other claims from this paper (12)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.