Moraxellaceae 474 claims

family · order Moraxellales · 37 taxa · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

37 entries

Acinetobacter156 claims · 115 papersAcinetobacter calcoaceticusalso A. calcoaceticus DP25 · also A. calcoaceticus PUCM1006133 claims · 38 papersAcinetobacter baumanniialso A. baumannii PUCM1029 · also A.baumannii45 claims · 29 papersAcinetobacter pittiialso A. pittii gp-123 claims · 9 papersAcinetobacter lwoffiialso A. lwoffii strain PAU_31LN · also A. lwoffii 5M120 claims · 6 papersAcinetobacter johnsonii13 claims · 4 papersAcinetobacter radioresistensalso A.radioresistens9 claims · 7 papersAcinetobacter schindleri8 claims · 4 papersAcinetobacter junii7 claims · 2 papersAcinetobacter baylyi6 claims · 2 papersAcinetobacter seifertii6 claims · 1 paperAcinetobacter guillouiaealso A. guillouiae SW55 claims · 2 papersAcinetobacter sp.5 claims · 2 papersAcinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606 = CIP 70.34 = JCM 6841also Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 196063 claims · 1 paperAcinetobacter lactucae3 claims · 2 papersMoraxella3 claims · 3 papersMoraxellaceae3 claims · 3 papersPsychrobacter3 claims · 3 papersAcinetobacter boissieri2 claims · 1 paperAcinetobacter nosocomialis2 claims · 1 paperAcinetobacter soli2 claims · 2 papersFaucicola osloensisalso M. osloensis · also Moraxella osloensis2 claims · 2 papersMoraxella pluranimaliumalso M. pluranimalium S-292 claims · 1 paperPsychrobacter sp. SRS82 claims · 1 paperAcinetobacter bohemicus1 claim · 1 paperAcinetobacter genospecies1 claim · 1 paperAcinetobacter nectaris1 claim · 1 paperAcinetobacter septicus1 claim · 1 paperAcinetobacter sp. Ac-141 claim · 1 paperAcinetobacter sp. MR51 claim · 1 paperAcinetobacter sp. PUCM10071 claim · 1 paperAcinetobacter sp. PUCM10221 claim · 1 paperAcinetobacter sp. SK21 claim · 1 paperAcinetobacter ursingii1 claim · 1 paperAcinetobacter vivianii1 claim · 1 paperMoraxella catarrhalis1 claim · 1 paperPsychrobacter alimentarius1 claim · 1 paper
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Antibacterial testing against Acinetobacter baumannii showed significant efficacy, with MIC values as low as 0.056 mg/mL.

Taxon
C. canumCalophyllum canume1
Organ / stage
stem barke1
Interactor
Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter baumanniie0other
Outcome
MIC valuese0
Value
0.056 mg/mLe0

Verbatim

e0

“Antibacterial testing against Acinetobacter baumannii revealed significant efficacy, with MIC values as low as 0.056 mg/mL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1078
e1

“C. canum stem bark extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–119

Title

Phytochemical Composition, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Calophyllum Canum Hook. f. ex T. Anderson Extracts: Molecular Docking Insights

Mas Atikah Lizazman; Vivien Jong Yi Mian; Thiruventhan Karunakaran; et al. Chemistry & Biodiversity 2026. doi:10.1002/cbdv.202500773

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-rhizobial genera Acinetobacter and the JC017 lineage were also detected in the common bean nodule microbiome.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Interactor
AcinetobacterAcinetobactere5symbiont
Second interactor
JC017 lineagee5symbiont
Outcome
were also detectede5

Verbatim

e0

“Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a strategic crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55
e5

“At the genus level, Rhizobium was the most abundant taxon, while non-rhizobial genera such as Acinetobacter and the JC017 lineage were also detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–982

Title

Functional Stability of the Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Nodule Microbiome in Semi-Arid Regions

Cinthya Judith Ortega-Esparza; Erika Nava-Reyna; María del Rosario Jacobo-Salcedo; et al. Diversity 2026. doi:10.3390/d18060374

Other claims from this paper (8)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acinetobacter sp. emerged as a dominant member of the tomato microbiota at the plant-soil continuum.

Interactor
Acinetobacter sp.Acinetobactere3symbiont
Outcome
dominant member of the microbiotae3

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato is a staple crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–32
e3

“An individual bacterium, classified as Acinetobacter sp., emerged as a dominant member of the microbiota at the plant-soil continuum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–570

Title

Acinetobacter enrichment shapes composition and function of the bacterial microbiota of field-grown tomato plants

Senga Robertson; Alexandros Mosca; Saira Ashraf; et al. mSphere 2026. doi:10.1128/msphere.00842-25

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An Acinetobacter calcoaceticus genome showed functional specialization for plant-growth promotion traits.

Interactor
Acinetobacter calcoaceticusAcinetobacter calcoaceticuse6symbiont
Outcome
functional specialization for plant-growth promotion traitse6
Qualifier
phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and reactive oxygen species detoxificatione6

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato is a staple crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–32
e6

“A metagenome-assembled genome representative of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus was retrieved, and metagenomic reads associated with this species identified a functional specialization for plant-growth promotion traits, such as phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and reactive oxygen species detoxification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1379

Title

Acinetobacter enrichment shapes composition and function of the bacterial microbiota of field-grown tomato plants

Senga Robertson; Alexandros Mosca; Saira Ashraf; et al. mSphere 2026. doi:10.1128/msphere.00842-25

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant-growth promotion traits were similarly represented in a tomato genotype-independent fashion.

Interactor
Acinetobacter calcoaceticusAcinetobacter calcoaceticuse6symbiont
Outcome
plant-growth promotion traitse6
Qualifier
genotype-independente7

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato is a staple crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–32
e6

“A metagenome-assembled genome representative of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus was retrieved, and metagenomic reads associated with this species identified a functional specialization for plant-growth promotion traits, such as phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and reactive oxygen species detoxification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1379
e7

“which were similarly represented in a tomato genotype-independent fashion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1454

Title

Acinetobacter enrichment shapes composition and function of the bacterial microbiota of field-grown tomato plants

Senga Robertson; Alexandros Mosca; Saira Ashraf; et al. mSphere 2026. doi:10.1128/msphere.00842-25

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acinetobacter is the dominant bacterial genus in stems of Cypripedium franchetii.

Taxon
Cypripedium franchetiiCypripedium franchetiit0
Organ / stage
stemse2
Interactor
AcinetobacterAcinetobactere2symbiont
Outcome
dominatede2

Verbatim

t0

“Spatial heterogeneity of the microbiota in Cypripedium franchetii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65
e2

“At the genus level, dominant taxa showed tissue specificity: Cronobacter and Lactobacillus were dominant bacterial genera in roots, whereas Acinetobacter dominated in stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1525

Title

Spatial heterogeneity of the microbiota in Cypripedium franchetii and Its correlation with organ-specific metabolomes

Ying Tang; Mingyu Dang; Wenwen Xie; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1751651

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acinetobacter and Agrobacterium are prominent bacterial genera in leaves of Cypripedium franchetii.

Taxon
Cypripedium franchetiiCypripedium franchetiit0
Organ / stage
leavese3
Interactor
AcinetobacterAcinetobactere3symbiont
Second interactor
AgrobacteriumAgrobacteriume3symbiont
Outcome
prominente3

Verbatim

t0

“Spatial heterogeneity of the microbiota in Cypripedium franchetii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65
e3

“Acinetobacter and Agrobacterium were prominent in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1587

Title

Spatial heterogeneity of the microbiota in Cypripedium franchetii and Its correlation with organ-specific metabolomes

Ying Tang; Mingyu Dang; Wenwen Xie; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1751651

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. nosocomialis was primarily found in the Muna and Platinum tomato varieties.

Interactor
A. nosocomialisAcinetobacter nosocomialise2pathogent0
Outcome
primarily founde2
Qualifier
Muna and Platinum varietiese2

Verbatim

t0

“Bacterial Pathogens Associated with Selected Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–95
e1

“three tomato hybrids (Muna, Cobra, and Platinum) and one local cultivar (Yollins) grown in southeastern Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–530
e2

“A. nosocomialis (a Gram-negative member of the A. calcoaceticus–baumannii complex) primarily found in the Muna and Platinum varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1193

Title

Phylogeny and Molecular Characterisation of Bacterial Pathogens Associated with Selected Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Varieties in Enugu State

*Ishieze, Patience Ukamaka; Dauda, Nathaniel; Ezugwu, Chekwube Cecilia; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18326645

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virulence-linked genes in A. nosocomialis and C. populi indicate an emerging phytosanitary risk to tomato.

Interactor
A. nosocomialisAcinetobacter nosocomialise6pathogent0
Second interactor
C. populiCorticimicrobacter populie6other
Outcome
emerging phytosanitary riske6

Verbatim

t0

“Bacterial Pathogens Associated with Selected Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–95
e1

“three tomato hybrids (Muna, Cobra, and Platinum) and one local cultivar (Yollins) grown in southeastern Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–530
e6

“The presence of virulence-linked genes in A. nosocomialis and C. populi underscores an emerging phytosanitary risk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1872–1986

Title

Phylogeny and Molecular Characterisation of Bacterial Pathogens Associated with Selected Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Varieties in Enugu State

*Ishieze, Patience Ukamaka; Dauda, Nathaniel; Ezugwu, Chekwube Cecilia; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18326645

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Protomyces and Vishniacozyma were the dominant microbial genera in avocado nectar.

Taxon
avocadoPersea americanat0
Organ / stage
avocado nectare1
Interactor
Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Protomyces, and VishniacozymaPseudomonasAcinetobacterProtomycesVishniacozymae1symbiont
Outcome
dominant microbial generae1

Verbatim

t0

“avocado floral nectar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–39
e1

“Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Protomyces, and Vishniacozyma were the dominant microbial genera inhabiting avocado nectar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1158

Title

The microbiota of avocado floral nectar inhibits pathogens and improves plant fitness

Claudia Marina López-García; Indira Aranza Rodríguez-Gómez; Yareli Pérez-Bautista; et al. Journal of Experimental Botany 2026. doi:10.1093/jxb/erag038

Other claims from this paper (5)