A. citricidus 15 claims

Interactor role: pest

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

15 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. citricidus was not detected.

Taxon: CitrusCitrust0
Interactor: A. citricidusAphis citriciduse0pest
Outcome: A. citricidus was not detectede0

Verbatim

e0
“A. citricidus was not detected”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–749

t0
“Aphid Species in Citrus Orchards”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32

Title

Aphid Species in Citrus Orchards in Crete: Key Vectors of Citrus Tristeza Virus and Automated Monitoring Innovations for Alate Aphids

Matthaios M. Mathioudakis; Kyriaki Varikou; Antonia Karagianni; et al. Viruses 2025. doi:10.3390/v17030395

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observation Aphis spiraecola was the most abundant aphid, ranging from 44 to 100%.
Observation A. gossypii followed at less than 50%.
Observation Toxoptera aurantii was present in low numbers.
Observation Myzus persicae was present in low numbers.
Observation A. craccivora was present in low numbers.
Observation CTV was absent from pilot orchard aphids and trees.
Observation A. spiraecola was predominant among CTV-positive aphids.
Observation A. gossypii was CTV-positive.
Observation T. aurantii was CTV-positive.
Method / resource Wingbeat identification was faster than traditional identification with about 95% accuracy for two species.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. citricidus was not detected in citrus orchards.

Taxon: CitrusCitrust0
Interactor: A. citricidusAphis citriciduse0pest
Outcome: not detectede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“A. citricidus, the most efficient CTV vector, was not detected.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–850

t0
“Citrus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6

Title

Citrus Aphids in Algarve Region (Portugal): Species, Hosts, and Biological Control

Paulo Eduardo Branco Paiva; Luís Mascarenhas Neto; Natália Tomás Marques; et al. Ecologies 2024. doi:10.3390/ecologies5010007

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Aphis spiraecola represented over 80% of aphids on citrus.
Association Citrus leaf deformation from Aphis spiraecola was proportional to aphid density.
Observation A. gossypii occurred among citrus aphids in descending rank.
Observation A. aurantii occurred among citrus aphids in descending rank.
Observation Macrosiphum euphorbiae occurred among citrus aphids in descending rank.
Observation Aphid nymphs outnumbered adults in every species.
Observation A. spiraecola populations peaked on lemon in spring above 100 per shoot.
Observation A. spiraecola populations peaked on orange in spring above 100 per shoot.
Observation Great aphid damage was observed in orange trees.
Observation Great aphid damage was observed in lemon trees.
Observation Great aphid damage was observed in mandarin trees.
Observation A. gossypii occurred mainly in mandarin trees.
Observation A. gossypii occurred mainly in tangor trees.
Observation Lysiphlebus spp. parasitism of A. spiraecola was low at 0.3–1.5%.
Observation Binodoxys spp. parasitism of A. spiraecola was low at 0.3–1.5%.
Observation The ratio was 150 to 440 aphids per predator.
Observation syrphids occurred among aphid predators.
Observation lacewings occurred among aphid predators.
Observation coccinellids (Scymnus) occurred among aphid predators.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. citricidus saliva decreased D. citri duration of the extracellular stylet pathway.

Taxon: CitrusCitrust0
Treatment: infiltration of A. citricidus salivae0
Interactor: D. citriDiaphorina citrie0pest
Second interactor: A. citricidusAphis citriciduse0pest
Outcome: duration of the extracellular stylet pathwaye0
Direction: decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“By contrast, infiltration of A. citricidus saliva decreased the duration of the extracellular stylet pathway and phloem sap ingestion of D. citri.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–963

t0
“Two Citrus Aphid Species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63

Title

Saliva-Mediated Contrasting Effects of Two Citrus Aphid Species on Asian Citrus Psyllid Feeding Behavior and Plant Jasmonic Acid Pathway

Jing Gao; Tonglai Tao; Steven P. Arthurs; et al. Insects 2023. doi:10.3390/insects14080672

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva prolonged D. citri extracellular stylet pathway duration.
Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva decreased D. citri phloem sap ingestion duration.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva decreased D. citri phloem sap ingestion of D. citri.
Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva activated citrus SA and JA pathway genes.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva activated two SA-pathway-related genes.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva suppressed three JA-pathway-related genes.
Intervention effect Boiled saliva did not similarly affect psyllid feeding or citrus defense.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. citricidus saliva decreased D. citri phloem sap ingestion of D. citri.

Taxon: CitrusCitrust0
Treatment: infiltration of A. citricidus salivae0
Interactor: D. citriDiaphorina citrie0pest
Second interactor: A. citricidusAphis citriciduse0pest
Outcome: phloem sap ingestion of D. citrie0
Direction: decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“By contrast, infiltration of A. citricidus saliva decreased the duration of the extracellular stylet pathway and phloem sap ingestion of D. citri.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–963

t0
“Two Citrus Aphid Species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63

Title

Saliva-Mediated Contrasting Effects of Two Citrus Aphid Species on Asian Citrus Psyllid Feeding Behavior and Plant Jasmonic Acid Pathway

Jing Gao; Tonglai Tao; Steven P. Arthurs; et al. Insects 2023. doi:10.3390/insects14080672

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva prolonged D. citri extracellular stylet pathway duration.
Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva decreased D. citri phloem sap ingestion duration.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva decreased D. citri duration of the extracellular stylet pathway.
Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva activated citrus SA and JA pathway genes.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva activated two SA-pathway-related genes.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva suppressed three JA-pathway-related genes.
Intervention effect Boiled saliva did not similarly affect psyllid feeding or citrus defense.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. citricidus saliva activated two SA-pathway-related genes.

Taxon: CitrusCitrust0
Treatment: A. citricidus saliva infiltratione0
Interactor: A. citricidusAphis citriciduse0pest
Outcome: two SA-pathway-related genese0
Direction: activatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“However, two SA-pathway-related genes were activated and three JA-pathway-related genes were suppressed following A. citricidus saliva infiltration.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1289

t0
“Two Citrus Aphid Species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63

Title

Saliva-Mediated Contrasting Effects of Two Citrus Aphid Species on Asian Citrus Psyllid Feeding Behavior and Plant Jasmonic Acid Pathway

Jing Gao; Tonglai Tao; Steven P. Arthurs; et al. Insects 2023. doi:10.3390/insects14080672

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva prolonged D. citri extracellular stylet pathway duration.
Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva decreased D. citri phloem sap ingestion duration.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva decreased D. citri duration of the extracellular stylet pathway.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva decreased D. citri phloem sap ingestion of D. citri.
Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva activated citrus SA and JA pathway genes.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva suppressed three JA-pathway-related genes.
Intervention effect Boiled saliva did not similarly affect psyllid feeding or citrus defense.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. citricidus saliva suppressed three JA-pathway-related genes.

Taxon: CitrusCitrust0
Treatment: A. citricidus saliva infiltratione0
Interactor: A. citricidusAphis citriciduse0pest
Outcome: three JA-pathway-related genese0
Direction: suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“However, two SA-pathway-related genes were activated and three JA-pathway-related genes were suppressed following A. citricidus saliva infiltration.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1289

t0
“Two Citrus Aphid Species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–63

Title

Saliva-Mediated Contrasting Effects of Two Citrus Aphid Species on Asian Citrus Psyllid Feeding Behavior and Plant Jasmonic Acid Pathway

Jing Gao; Tonglai Tao; Steven P. Arthurs; et al. Insects 2023. doi:10.3390/insects14080672

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva prolonged D. citri extracellular stylet pathway duration.
Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva decreased D. citri phloem sap ingestion duration.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva decreased D. citri duration of the extracellular stylet pathway.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva decreased D. citri phloem sap ingestion of D. citri.
Intervention effect A. spiraecola saliva activated citrus SA and JA pathway genes.
Intervention effect A. citricidus saliva activated two SA-pathway-related genes.
Intervention effect Boiled saliva did not similarly affect psyllid feeding or citrus defense.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeding by Aphis spiraecola, but not Aphis citricidus, caused leaf curling on sweet orange.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment: feeding by A. spiraecolae1
Interactor: A. spiraecolaAphis spiraecolae1pest
Second interactor: A. citricidusAphis citriciduse1pest
Outcome: leaf curlinge1
Comparator: A. citriciduse1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“sweet orange, Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck (Rutaceae)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–380

e1
“feeding by A. spiraecola , but not A. citricidus , caused leaf curling, reduced shoot length, shoot fresh weight, and chlorophyll concentration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–814

Title

Aphis spiraecola and Aphis (Toxoptera) citricidus differently manipulate plant metabolism to gain fitness in terms of population abundance or dispersal

Jing Gao; Baolin Xiu; Ziqiang Sun; et al. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2021. doi:10.1111/eea.13125

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Feeding by Aphis spiraecola reduced shoot length, shoot fresh weight and chlorophyll concentration of sweet orange.
Intervention effect Feeding by Aphis spiraecola increased essential amino acid concentration in sweet orange leaves compared with uninfested control plants.
Intervention effect Aphis citricidus gained faster access and acceptance of sweet orange phloem than Aphis spiraecola.
Intervention effect Aphis citricidus spent more time ingesting sweet orange phloem sap than Aphis spiraecola.
Intervention effect After 2 weeks of infestation, Aphis spiraecola produced more winged morphs than Aphis citricidus.
Intervention effect Aphis citricidus achieved higher population abundance than Aphis spiraecola on sweet orange.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeding by Aphis spiraecola reduced shoot length, shoot fresh weight and chlorophyll concentration of sweet orange.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment: feeding by A. spiraecolae1
Interactor: A. spiraecolaAphis spiraecolae1pest
Second interactor: A. citricidusAphis citriciduse1pest
Outcome: shoot length, shoot fresh weight, and chlorophyll concentratione1
Direction: reducede1
Comparator: A. citriciduse1

Verbatim

e0
“sweet orange, Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck (Rutaceae)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–380

e1
“feeding by A. spiraecola , but not A. citricidus , caused leaf curling, reduced shoot length, shoot fresh weight, and chlorophyll concentration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–814

Title

Aphis spiraecola and Aphis (Toxoptera) citricidus differently manipulate plant metabolism to gain fitness in terms of population abundance or dispersal

Jing Gao; Baolin Xiu; Ziqiang Sun; et al. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2021. doi:10.1111/eea.13125

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Feeding by Aphis spiraecola, but not Aphis citricidus, caused leaf curling on sweet orange.
Intervention effect Feeding by Aphis spiraecola increased essential amino acid concentration in sweet orange leaves compared with uninfested control plants.
Intervention effect Aphis citricidus gained faster access and acceptance of sweet orange phloem than Aphis spiraecola.
Intervention effect Aphis citricidus spent more time ingesting sweet orange phloem sap than Aphis spiraecola.
Intervention effect After 2 weeks of infestation, Aphis spiraecola produced more winged morphs than Aphis citricidus.
Intervention effect Aphis citricidus achieved higher population abundance than Aphis spiraecola on sweet orange.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeding by Aphis spiraecola increased essential amino acid concentration in sweet orange leaves compared with uninfested control plants.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Organ / stage: leavese2
Treatment: A. spiraecola feedinge2
Interactor: A. spiraecolaAphis spiraecolae2pest
Second interactor: A. citricidusAphis citriciduse2pest
Outcome: concentration of essential amino acidse2
Direction: increasede2
Comparator: uninfested control plantse2

Verbatim

e0
“sweet orange, Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck (Rutaceae)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–380

e2
“A. spiraecola feeding increased the concentration of essential amino acids in leaves when compared with A. citricidus and uninfested control plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–976

Title

Aphis spiraecola and Aphis (Toxoptera) citricidus differently manipulate plant metabolism to gain fitness in terms of population abundance or dispersal

Jing Gao; Baolin Xiu; Ziqiang Sun; et al. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2021. doi:10.1111/eea.13125

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Feeding by Aphis spiraecola, but not Aphis citricidus, caused leaf curling on sweet orange.
Intervention effect Feeding by Aphis spiraecola reduced shoot length, shoot fresh weight and chlorophyll concentration of sweet orange.
Intervention effect Aphis citricidus gained faster access and acceptance of sweet orange phloem than Aphis spiraecola.
Intervention effect Aphis citricidus spent more time ingesting sweet orange phloem sap than Aphis spiraecola.
Intervention effect After 2 weeks of infestation, Aphis spiraecola produced more winged morphs than Aphis citricidus.
Intervention effect Aphis citricidus achieved higher population abundance than Aphis spiraecola on sweet orange.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphis citricidus gained faster access and acceptance of sweet orange phloem than Aphis spiraecola.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment: A. citriciduse3
Interactor: A. citricidusAphis citriciduse3pest
Second interactor: A. spiraecolaAphis spiraecolae3pest
Outcome: access and acceptance of phloeme3
Direction: fastere3
Comparator: A. spiraecolae3

Verbatim

e0
“sweet orange, Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck (Rutaceae)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–380

e3
“A. citricidus gained faster access and acceptance of phloem, and spent more time ingesting phloem sap, than A. spiraecola”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1148

Title

Aphis spiraecola and Aphis (Toxoptera) citricidus differently manipulate plant metabolism to gain fitness in terms of population abundance or dispersal

Jing Gao; Baolin Xiu; Ziqiang Sun; et al. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2021. doi:10.1111/eea.13125

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Feeding by Aphis spiraecola, but not Aphis citricidus, caused leaf curling on sweet orange.
Intervention effect Feeding by Aphis spiraecola reduced shoot length, shoot fresh weight and chlorophyll concentration of sweet orange.
Intervention effect Feeding by Aphis spiraecola increased essential amino acid concentration in sweet orange leaves compared with uninfested control plants.
Intervention effect Aphis citricidus spent more time ingesting sweet orange phloem sap than Aphis spiraecola.
Intervention effect After 2 weeks of infestation, Aphis spiraecola produced more winged morphs than Aphis citricidus.
Intervention effect Aphis citricidus achieved higher population abundance than Aphis spiraecola on sweet orange.