A flavus 23 claims

2 spellings

Interactor role: other, pathogen

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICGIL 17101 resisted A. flavus with severity 1 and incidence below 7%.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Material
ICGIL 17101e0
Interactor
A flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
colonization severitye0
Direction
resistancee0
Value
1e0
Qualifier
very less incidence percentage (< 7%)e0

Verbatim

e0

“ICGIL 17101 and ICGIL 17124) showed resistance to A flavus with colonization severity of 1 and very less incidence percentage (< 7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–614
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–19

Title

Potential groundnut pre-breeding genotypes with resistance to Aspergillus flavus

Gopalakrishna K. Naidu; Sameer B. Dange; H. L. Nadaf Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 2022. doi:10.37992/2022.1301.033

Other claims from this paper (8)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICGIL 17124 resisted A. flavus with severity 1 and incidence below 7%.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Material
ICGIL 17124e0
Interactor
A flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
colonization severitye0
Direction
resistancee0
Value
1e0
Qualifier
very less incidence percentage (< 7%)e0

Verbatim

e0

“ICGIL 17101 and ICGIL 17124) showed resistance to A flavus with colonization severity of 1 and very less incidence percentage (< 7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–614
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–19

Title

Potential groundnut pre-breeding genotypes with resistance to Aspergillus flavus

Gopalakrishna K. Naidu; Sameer B. Dange; H. L. Nadaf Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 2022. doi:10.37992/2022.1301.033

Other claims from this paper (8)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend field testing these genotypes to confirm resistance.

Interactor
A flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
tested under field conditions to confirm their resistance to A flavuse0

Verbatim

e0

“These genotypes can be tested under field conditions to confirm their resistance to A flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1330
t0

“Peanut Aspergillus flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69

Title

Identification of Sources of Resistance for Peanut Aspergillus flavus Colonization and Aflatoxin Contamination

Richard Moise Alansou Dieme; Issa Faye; Yedomon Ange Bovys Zoclanclounon; et al. International Journal of Agronomy 2018. doi:10.1155/2018/5468602

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus flavus contamination of pistachio samples was lower in the Khanjari cultivar than in the Akbari cultivar.

Taxon
pistachioPistacia verat0
Material
Khanjari cultivare1
Interactor
A Flavuse1pathogen
Outcome
contaminatione1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
Akbari cultivare1

Verbatim

t0

“Damghan pistachio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–78
e1

“The contamination of the samples to the fungus A Flavus differ from each other, there is less contamination in the Khanjari cultivar and more contamination in Akbari cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–800

Title

Evaluation of fruits cultivar and different harvest times of Damghan pistachio to early split complications and contamination to the Aspergillus flavus fungus

Fatemeh Amini; H Afshari; Mostafa Moghaddam 2012. doi:10.22034/jon.2012.515724

Other claims from this paper (3)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. flavus counts ranged from 5.00 to 8.16 log 10 (cfu g −1) under simulated storage conditions.

Taxon
Phoenix dactyliferaPhoenix dactyliferae1
Treatment
simulated storage conditionse5
Interactor
A flavusAspergillus flavuse5other
Outcome
counts of A flavuse5
Value
5.00 to 8.16 log 10 (cfu g −1)e5

Verbatim

e1

“date fruit ( Phoenix dactylifera )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–64
e5

“The counts of A flavus ranged from 5.00 to 8.16 log 10 (cfu g −1) under simulated storage conditions”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 890–991

Title

The production of aflatoxins in fresh date fruits and under simulated storage conditions

Mariam Shenasi; Alan A G Candlish; Kofi E Aidoo Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2002. doi:10.1002/jsfa.1118

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxigenic A. flavus strains accounted for 62.6% of 254 strains from the main groundnut-producing area of Fujian.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Interactor
A flavust0pathogen
Outcome
toxigenic A flavus strains accounted fore0
Value
62 6%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut A flavus strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–59
e0

“The toxigenic A flavus strains accounted for 62 6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–222

Title

Toxigenicity and pathogenicity of groundnut A flavus strain

Zao Tang 2000

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low toxic strains made up 46.1% of the A. flavus strains.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Interactor
A flavust0pathogen
Outcome
low toxice0
Value
46 1%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut A flavus strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–59
e0

“the low toxic,middle toxic and high toxic strains making up 46 1%,14 2% and 2 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–315

Title

Toxigenicity and pathogenicity of groundnut A flavus strain

Zao Tang 2000

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Middle toxic strains made up 14.2% of the A. flavus strains.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Interactor
A flavust0pathogen
Outcome
middle toxice0
Value
14 2%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut A flavus strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–59
e0

“the low toxic,middle toxic and high toxic strains making up 46 1%,14 2% and 2 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–315

Title

Toxigenicity and pathogenicity of groundnut A flavus strain

Zao Tang 2000

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High toxic strains made up 2.4% of the A. flavus strains.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Interactor
A flavust0pathogen
Outcome
high toxice0
Value
2 4%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut A flavus strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–59
e0

“the low toxic,middle toxic and high toxic strains making up 46 1%,14 2% and 2 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–315

Title

Toxigenicity and pathogenicity of groundnut A flavus strain

Zao Tang 2000

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-toxigenic strains accounted for 37.4% of the A. flavus strains.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Interactor
A flavust0pathogen
Outcome
strains accounted fore0
Value
37 4%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut A flavus strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–59
e0

“the non\|toxigenic strains accounted for 37 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–379

Title

Toxigenicity and pathogenicity of groundnut A flavus strain

Zao Tang 2000

Other claims from this paper (10)