Mymaridae 5 claims

family · order Hymenoptera · 2 taxa · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

2 entries

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf epidermal characters supported the taxonomic treatment.

Taxon
SchizophragmaSchizophragmat0
Organ / stage
leaf epidermale0
Outcome
taxonomic treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The taxonomic treatment is supported by leaf epidermal characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–578
t0

“Schizophragma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42

Title

The identity of some taxa of Schizophragma (Saxifragaceae)

Wei LIU; Xiang‐Yun ZHU Journal of Systematics and Evolution 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00014.x

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop had no effect on adult Anagrus abundance in 1996.

Taxon
AnagrusAnagruse0
Treatment
cover crope0
Outcome
adult Anagruse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no effect of cover crop on adult Anagrus in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–472

Title

Influence of flowering cover crops on Anagrus parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) and Erythroneura leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in New York vineyards

Greg English‐Loeb; Marc Rhainds; Tim Martinson; et al. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1461-9563.2003.00179.x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adult Anagrus were more abundant at the vineyard edge, especially early in the season.

Taxon
AnagrusAnagruse0
Outcome
adults were more abundant at the vineyard edgee1
Qualifier
especially early in the seasone1

Verbatim

e0

“adult Anagrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–464
e1

“adults were more abundant at the vineyard edge, especially early in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–665

Title

Influence of flowering cover crops on Anagrus parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) and Erythroneura leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in New York vineyards

Greg English‐Loeb; Marc Rhainds; Tim Martinson; et al. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1461-9563.2003.00179.x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a laboratory study, longevity of female Anagrus was increased when provided with honey or sugar water compared to water only or nothing.

Taxon
AnagrusAnagruse0
Treatment
honey or sugar watere0
Outcome
longevity of female Anagruse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
water only or nothinge0
Setting
laboratory studye0

Verbatim

e0

“In a laboratory study, longevity of female Anagrus was increased when provided with honey or sugar water compared to water only or nothing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1362

Title

Influence of flowering cover crops on Anagrus parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) and Erythroneura leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in New York vineyards

Greg English‐Loeb; Marc Rhainds; Tim Martinson; et al. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1461-9563.2003.00179.x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit wall fragmentation may have permitted larger seeds in Decumaria, Pileostegia and Schizophragma.

Taxon
Decumaria, Pileostegia, and SchizophragmaHydrangea sect. DecumariaHydrangea sect. PileostegiaSchizophragmae0
Outcome
increase of seed sizee0
Qualifier
fruit wall fragmentatione0

Verbatim

e0

“A shift from apical, interstylar dehiscence of fruits that produce a very limited gap for seed emergence in most members of the hydrangea clade to fruit wall fragmentation may have permitted an increase of seed size in Decumaria, Pileostegia, and Schizophragma.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1099

Title

Seed Morphology of Hydrangeaceae and Its Phylogenetic Implications

Larry Hufford International Journal of Plant Sciences 1995. doi:10.1086/297279

Other claims from this paper (14)