Literal values, not normalised. 437,395 distinct spellings cover 11,236,429 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.
Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Environmental change contributed to range expansion of H. annuus and H. tuberosus .
expansion of the range e0 Changes in environmental conditions e0 Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “Changes in environmental conditions contributed to the expansion of the range of H. annuus L. and H. tuberosus L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–864 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid combinations using paternal line B0708VG showed maximum herbicide resistance and exceeded line B0707VG.
aherbicide treatment e0 resistance to aherbicide treatment e0 Verbatim
t0 “h. annuus l. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–65 e0 “The maximum resistance to aherbicide treatment was demonstrated by plants of hybrid combinations received by using the paternal line B0708VG, which line was significantly superior to the B0707VG line ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–611 Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Low dose lanthanum had a hormetic effect on Helianthus shoots.
hormetic effects e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “La and Nd, at lower dosages (<∼100 mg/kg), had hormetic effects, respectively, on the shoot and root of H. annuus L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–909 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Low dose neodymium had a hormetic effect on Helianthus roots.
hormetic effects e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “La and Nd, at lower dosages (<∼100 mg/kg), had hormetic effects, respectively, on the shoot and root of H. annuus L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–909 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Helianthus annuus was more resistant to rare earth elements than Brassica chinensis .
resistant to the studied REEs e0 more resistant e0 B. chinensis L.e0 Verbatim
e0 “H. annuus L. was more resistant to the studied REEs when compared to B. chinensis L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1211 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A 20 t ha–1 sewage sludge dose grew H. annuus L. comparably to commercial fertilizer.
20 t ha–1 dose of sewage sludge e0 grow H. annuus L. e0 commercial fertilizer e0 Verbatim
e0 “The 20 t ha–1 dose of sewage sludge proved effective to grow H. annuus L. with similar results to those grown with a commercial fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–972 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Coir-pith cyanobacterial biofertilizer significantly improved sunflower morphometric parameters versus control and chemical fertilizer.
coir pith based cyanobacterial biofertilizer e0 control and the chemical fertilizer treated H. annuus L. e0 Verbatim
e0 “significant improvement in both morphometric and yield parameters in the plants treated with coir pith based cyanobacterial biofertilizer than that of control and the chemical fertilizer treated H. annuus L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–791 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Coir-pith cyanobacterial biofertilizer significantly improved sunflower yield parameters versus control and chemical fertilizer.
coir pith based cyanobacterial biofertilizer e0 yield parameters e0 control and the chemical fertilizer treated H. annuus L. e0 Verbatim
e0 “significant improvement in both morphometric and yield parameters in the plants treated with coir pith based cyanobacterial biofertilizer than that of control and the chemical fertilizer treated H. annuus L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–791 Other claims from this paper (2) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose coir-pith cyanobacterial biofertilizer as a substitute for chemical fertilizer.
substitute for chemical fertilizer e0 Verbatim
e0 “it could be used as substitute for chemical fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–856 e1 “the cultivation of sunflower (H. annuus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–343 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed set was very low in both cross directions.
Insemination (seed set) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Insemination (seed set) was very low in both directions. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–357 t0 “H. pumilus Nutt. and H. annuus L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–69 Other claims from this paper (9) 
Helianthus annuuse0