Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Vermicompost at 6.0 t/ha significantly raised seed protein content.

A claim from Effect of vermicompost and biofertilizer on symbiotic efficiency and yield of cowpea in arid zone of Rajasthan · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 6.0 t/ha significantly raised seed protein content.

Treatment
6.0 t/ha of vermicomposte0
Outcome
protein content in seede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content in seed and effective root nodules significantly higher upto 6.0 t/ha of vermicompost over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–981
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84
t1

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84

Title

Effect of vermicompost and biofertilizer on symbiotic efficiency and yield of cowpea in arid zone of Rajasthan

V.M. KHAN; R.S. MANOHAR; H.P. VERMA ASIAN JOURNAL OF BIO SCIENCE 2015. doi:10.15740/has/ajbs/10.1/113-115

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-00d08d567f80cb5e86e4383328892160767d153da49115327d496ea5bec3769b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 33 positive, 2 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.