Claim · model-written summary
SRI had a benefit-cost ratio of 1.70 compared with 1.40 under traditional planting.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- SRIe0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- over and abovee0
- Value
- 1.70e0
- Qualifier
- 1.40e0
- Comparator
- TRPe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B:C ratio of 1.70 in case of SRI over and above the TRP (1.40)”
t0“Rice (Oryza sativa)”
Title
Ayesha Mohanty; Md. Rashidul Islam; Gyanesh Kumar; et al. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 2016
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect SRI produced 25.44 per cent more yield than traditional planting.
- Intervention effect Pooled SRI grain yield was 21.45 q ha-1, compared with 17.10 q ha-1 under traditional planting.
- Intervention effect SRI plant height was 145.67 cm and exceeded traditional planting.
- Intervention effect SRI effective tillers per hill were 12 and exceeded traditional planting.
- Intervention effect SRI panicle length was 23 cm and exceeded traditional planting.
- Intervention effect SRI had 120.33 grains per panicle, more than traditional planting.
- Intervention effect SRI test weight was 20.67 g and exceeded traditional planting.
- Intervention effect SRI net return was 61.23 per cent higher than traditional planting.
- Association Grain yield under SRI and traditional planting was positively and significantly correlated with plant height, tiller number and panicle length.
- Association Grain yield under SRI and traditional planting was positively and significantly correlated with grains per panicle and test weight.