Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cotton and green gram intercropping produced the highest or higher B:C ratio value of 2.92 compared with sole cotton on a flat bed.

A claim from Available soil moisture and yield of rainfed hybrid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) as influenced by rainwater conservation practices · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton and green gram intercropping produced the highest or higher B:C ratio value of 2.92 compared with sole cotton on a flat bed.

Treatment
intercropping system of cotton + green grame0
Interactor
green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0other
Outcome
B:C ratio valuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.92e0
Comparator
sole cotton on flat bed systeme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Interactor · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three years study revealed that highest seed cotton yield (1.43 tonne/ha) and cotton equivalent yield (1.95 tonne/ha) with higher net returns of `26,491/ha and B:C ratio value of 2.92 was obtained with intercropping system of cotton + green gram compared to sole cotton on flat bed system with 1.20 tonne/ha seed cotton yield and net returns of ` 11550/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–992
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–79

Title

Available soil moisture and yield of rainfed hybrid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) as influenced by rainwater conservation practices

JAGVIR SINGH; K.S. BHASKAR; P.R. BHARAMBE Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v56i2.4674

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-032d76f0b0085fbb38a1cc34f65532b97ca7fd5a205f4d94744ba3e25ae5d2d8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

intercropping · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

104 papers: 85 positive, 19 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.