Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Available soil moisture and yield of rainfed hybrid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) as influenced by rainwater conservation practices

JAGVIR SINGH; K.S. BHASKAR; P.R. BHARAMBE

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To assess the effect of moisture conservation techniques for enhancement of soil moisture and yield of hybrid cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) under rainfed conditions, a field experiment was conducted during the rainy ( kharif ) seasons of three consecutive years 2004, 2005 and 2006 on vertisols, at Nagpur. The treatments com- prised of six soil moisture conservation practices viz., opening of furrows in each row, in alternate row, tied hoe- ing, three intercrops with cotton viz. soybean ( Glycine max L.), blackgram ( Phaseolus mungo L.) and greengram ( Phaseolus radiatus L.) with one flat bed system (no moisture conservation). Three years study revealed that highest seed cotton yield (1.43 tonne/ha) and cotton equivalent yield (1.95 tonne/ha) with higher net returns of `26,491/ha and B:C ratio value of 2.92 was obtained with intercropping system of cotton + green gram compared to sole cotton on flat bed system with 1.20 tonne/ha seed cotton yield and net returns of ` 11550/ha). During the period of sowing to flowering stage of cotton, the available soil moisture were found higher at surface soil by 9% due to intercropping system as compared to flat bed system and declined to the increasing depth of soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton and green gram intercropping produced the highest or higher seed cotton yield of 1.43 tonne/ha compared with sole cotton on a flat bed.

Treatment
intercropping system of cotton + green grame0
Interactor
green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0other
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.43 tonne/hae0
Comparator
sole cotton on flat bed systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Interactor · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three years study revealed that highest seed cotton yield (1.43 tonne/ha) and cotton equivalent yield (1.95 tonne/ha) with higher net returns of `26,491/ha and B:C ratio value of 2.92 was obtained with intercropping system of cotton + green gram compared to sole cotton on flat bed system with 1.20 tonne/ha seed cotton yield and net returns of ` 11550/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton and green gram intercropping produced the highest or higher cotton equivalent yield of 1.95 tonne/ha compared with sole cotton on a flat bed.

Treatment
intercropping system of cotton + green grame0
Interactor
green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0other
Outcome
cotton equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.95 tonne/hae0
Comparator
sole cotton on flat bed systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Interactor · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three years study revealed that highest seed cotton yield (1.43 tonne/ha) and cotton equivalent yield (1.95 tonne/ha) with higher net returns of `26,491/ha and B:C ratio value of 2.92 was obtained with intercropping system of cotton + green gram compared to sole cotton on flat bed system with 1.20 tonne/ha seed cotton yield and net returns of ` 11550/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton and green gram intercropping produced the highest or higher net returns of `26,491/ha compared with sole cotton on a flat bed.

Treatment
intercropping system of cotton + green grame0
Interactor
green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0other
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
`26,491/hae0
Comparator
sole cotton on flat bed systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Interactor · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three years study revealed that highest seed cotton yield (1.43 tonne/ha) and cotton equivalent yield (1.95 tonne/ha) with higher net returns of `26,491/ha and B:C ratio value of 2.92 was obtained with intercropping system of cotton + green gram compared to sole cotton on flat bed system with 1.20 tonne/ha seed cotton yield and net returns of ` 11550/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton and green gram intercropping produced the highest or higher B:C ratio value of 2.92 compared with sole cotton on a flat bed.

Treatment
intercropping system of cotton + green grame0
Interactor
green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0other
Outcome
B:C ratio valuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.92e0
Comparator
sole cotton on flat bed systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Interactor · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three years study revealed that highest seed cotton yield (1.43 tonne/ha) and cotton equivalent yield (1.95 tonne/ha) with higher net returns of `26,491/ha and B:C ratio value of 2.92 was obtained with intercropping system of cotton + green gram compared to sole cotton on flat bed system with 1.20 tonne/ha seed cotton yield and net returns of ` 11550/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton and green gram intercropping raised surface available soil moisture by 9% relative to flat beds from sowing to flowering.

Treatment
intercropping systeme0
Outcome
available soil moisturee0
Direction
highere0
Value
9%e0
Qualifier
sowing to flowering stage of cottone0
Comparator
flat bed systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the period of sowing to flowering stage of cotton, the available soil moisture were found higher at surface soil by 9% due to intercropping system as compared to flat bed system and declined to the increasing depth of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil moisture declined with increasing soil depth.

Outcome
available soil moisturee0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
increasing depth of soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available soil moisture were found higher at surface soil by 9% due to intercropping system as compared to flat bed system and declined to the increasing depth of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–79 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

intercropping · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

104 papers: 85 positive, 19 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

intercropping · soil: physics · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.