Intervention effectmodel-written summary

N-fertilized plants had higher chlorophyll, starch and reducing sugars.

A claim from Influence of nitrogen fertilization on water relations, photosynthesis, carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism of diverse pearl millet genotypes under arid conditions · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N-fertilized plants had higher chlorophyll, starch and reducing sugars.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
N fertilizede0
Outcome
total chlorophyll, starch, reducing sugarse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilized plants displayed significantly higher photosynthetic rates, leaf area, levels of total chlorophyll, starch, reducing sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–792
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–132

Title

Influence of nitrogen fertilization on water relations, photosynthesis, carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism of diverse pearl millet genotypes under arid conditions

S. KATHJU; U. BURMAN; B. K. GARG The Journal of Agricultural Science 2001. doi:10.1017/s0021859601001411

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-03404873fec4e8a158ac55b70b1f393a69c32358de0c489290d87f2d5c217313 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.