Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under moderate salinity, increasing nitrogen significantly raised shoot dry weight and shoot N content.

A claim from Nitrogen use efficiency and yield components of rice as influenced by reducing nitrogen application under salinity conditions in a pot experiment · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate salinity, increasing nitrogen significantly raised shoot dry weight and shoot N content.

Treatment
N levelse0
Outcome
shoot dry weight (SDW), shoot N content at active tillering (SNC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
moderate salinitye0
Comparator
non-saline conditionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under moderate salinity, most measured parameters including shoot dry weight (SDW), shoot N content at active tillering (SNC), effective panicle number (EPN) and GY increased significantly with N levels, but to a lesser extent than those of plants grown under non-saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–1036
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52

Title

Nitrogen use efficiency and yield components of rice as influenced by reducing nitrogen application under salinity conditions in a pot experiment

Nhung Thi Hong Phan; Adrien Heymans; Mathieu Bonnave; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2024. doi:10.1080/01904167.2024.2308201

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-03d06c22ef3d3cdc195fbe5e0e04c6d7d9aac311e733556ca08a9fb2b538954e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this claim · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.