Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Four POST treatments averaged 84% kochia control at 5 WAT and did not differ from glyphosate.

A claim from Effective Preemergence and Postemergence Herbicide Programs for Kochia Control · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four POST treatments averaged 84% kochia control at 5 WAT and did not differ from glyphosate.

Taxon
KochiaBassiat0
Treatment
bromoxynil + fluroxypyre0
Outcome
POST controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
84%e0
Qualifier
paraquat, tembotrione + atrazine, and topramezone + atrazinee0
Comparator
glyphosatee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bassia
Bassia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POST control with bromoxynil + fluroxypyr, paraquat, tembotrione + atrazine, and topramezone + atrazine treatments averaged 84% at 5 WAT, and did not differ from glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1031
t0

“Kochia Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78

Title

Effective Preemergence and Postemergence Herbicide Programs for Kochia Control

Vipan Kumar; Prashant Jha Weed Technology 2015. doi:10.1614/wt-d-14-00026.1

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-0480d515ed65fcbcf626a86027f539abd16a2e0019ec835ad1c19b684df45800 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · control · BassiaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fluroxypyr · control · BassiaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.