Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar sprays of micronized Lithothamnium sp. improved yield, mineral content and antioxidant activity of onion bulbs.

A claim from Biofortification and antioxidant improvement of onion bulbs using calcareous algae and storage · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sprays of micronized Lithothamnium sp. improved yield, mineral content and antioxidant activity of onion bulbs.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
onion cultivarse6
Treatment
foliar sprays with micronized Lithothamniun sp.e6
Outcome
yield, mineral content, antioxidant activitye1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
before and after storagee6

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59
e1

“The yield, mineral content, antioxidant activity, and phenolic and flavonoid content in onion bulbs were improved through sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–825
e6

“foliar sprays with micronized Lithothamniun sp. on yield, mineral nutrients, flavonoids, phenolic content, and antioxidant activity before and after storage of bulbs of two organically grown onion cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–695

Title

Biofortification and antioxidant improvement of onion bulbs using calcareous algae and storage

Aline Novaski; Átila Francisco Mógor; Juliana de Oliveira Amatussi; et al. Revista CERES 2023. doi:10.1590/0034-737x202370040005

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-066d3cd844f4e7f52731f067a0828c26efd7fbeef767cba0b4311a59edba24e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · quality: phytochemicals · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.