Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Olive pomace and sand at 1:2 increased transplant survival.

A claim from USING COMPOST AND OLIVE POMACE FOR TRANSPLANTING OF ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace and sand at 1:2 increased transplant survival.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Material
Aggezit0
Treatment
olive pomace + sand (1: 1 or 1: 2, v/v)e0
Outcome
survival (%)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102
e0

“survival (%) of transplants was significantly increased by planting the rooted cuttings in compost + sand (1: 2, v/v) and olive pomace + sand (1: 1 or 1: 2, v/v) media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–913

Title

USING COMPOST AND OLIVE POMACE FOR TRANSPLANTING OF ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS

A. Abou El-Khashab; E. Mikhail Journal of Plant Production 2015. doi:10.21608/jpp.2015.49760

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-0695e4e1d04fdc6a829f4c75ef8a400eed24311d1136823c802100e3d40dea35 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

growing medium · survival · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.