Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Production

USING COMPOST AND OLIVE POMACE FOR TRANSPLANTING OF ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS

A. Abou El-Khashab; E. Mikhail

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted under saran house at the Nursery of Hort. Res. Inst., ARC, Giza, Egypt during 2013 and 2014 seasons to examine the effect of some growing media, viz. compost + sand at 1:1, 1:2 or 1: 3 ratios, by volume and olive pomace + sand at the same ratio as suitable alternatives for traditional media (either loam + sand or peatmoss + sand at 1:2, v/v for each) usually used for transplanting rooted olive cuttings, transplanting times (on spring or autumn) and their interactions on growth and quality of rooted olive cuttings cv. Aggezi transplanted after 1, 2 or 3 months from rooting start for each time in 10-cm-diameter black plastic bags filled with about 1 kg of one of the aforementioned media. Results indicated that survival (%) of transplants was significantly increased by planting the rooted cuttings in compost + sand (1: 2, v/v) and olive pomace + sand (1: 1 or 1: 2, v/v) media, as these two media gave the highest percentages in most cases of both seasons. The first period (of spring) recorded the highest survival (%) for rooted cuttings transplanted after one month compared to those of the second period (of autumn), while the two periods alternatively scored the highest percent of survival for rooted cuttings transplanted after either 2 or 3 months from rooting commencement. However, the best survival (%) at all was attained by transplanting in either compost + sand or olive pomace + sand media (1: 2, vol. for each) on either first or second period. The results also showed that most vegetative and root growth parameters of the produced transplants were greatly improved by planting in either compost + sand (1 : 2, v/v) or olive pomace + sand (1 : 1or 1:2, v/v) media regardless of time of planting (either in spring or in autumn), but the mastery in both seasons was for planting in compost + sand (1 : 2, v/v) medium that recorded the highest means in most characters. The content of total chlorophyll in the leaves was significantly decreased in response to various treatments applied in such study, except of planting in sand amended with compost at 2: 1 or 3: 1, v/v which gave values greatly near to those registered by control media in the only 1st season. Hence, it can be recommended to transplant the rooted cuttings of olive cv. Aggezi in compost + sand (1 : 2, v/v) medium at any period of the year as a more suitable and cheaper medium than peatmoss + sand one.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost and sand at 1:2 increased transplant survival.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Material
Aggezit0
Treatment
compost + sand (1: 2, v/v)e0
Outcome
survival (%)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“survival (%) of transplants was significantly increased by planting the rooted cuttings in compost + sand (1: 2, v/v) and olive pomace + sand (1: 1 or 1: 2, v/v) media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace and sand at 1:1 increased transplant survival.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Material
Aggezit0
Treatment
olive pomace + sand (1: 1e0
Outcome
survival (%)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“survival (%) of transplants was significantly increased by planting the rooted cuttings in compost + sand (1: 2, v/v) and olive pomace + sand (1: 1 or 1: 2, v/v) media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace and sand at 1:2 increased transplant survival.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Material
Aggezit0
Treatment
olive pomace + sand (1: 1 or 1: 2, v/v)e0
Outcome
survival (%)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“survival (%) of transplants was significantly increased by planting the rooted cuttings in compost + sand (1: 2, v/v) and olive pomace + sand (1: 1 or 1: 2, v/v) media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring transplanting after one month had greater survival than autumn transplanting.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Treatment
springe0
Outcome
survival (%)e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
after one monthe0
Comparator
autumne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“The first period (of spring) recorded the highest survival (%) for rooted cuttings transplanted after one month compared to those of the second period (of autumn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two transplanting seasons alternately had the highest survival after two or three months from rooting.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Outcome
percent of survivale0
Qualifier
after either 2 or 3 months from rooting commencemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“the two periods alternatively scored the highest percent of survival for rooted cuttings transplanted after either 2 or 3 months from rooting commencement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost and sand at 1:2 gave the best survival overall in either period.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Treatment
compost + sande0
Outcome
survival (%)e0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
on either first or second periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“the best survival (%) at all was attained by transplanting in either compost + sand or olive pomace + sand media (1: 2, vol. for each) on either first or second period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace and sand at 1:2 gave the best survival overall in either period.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Treatment
olive pomace + sand media (1: 2, vol. for each)e0
Outcome
survival (%)e0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“the best survival (%) at all was attained by transplanting in either compost + sand or olive pomace + sand media (1: 2, vol. for each) on either first or second period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost and sand at 1:2 improved vegetative and root growth most consistently.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Treatment
compost + sand (1 : 2, v/v)e0
Outcome
vegetative and root growth parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“most vegetative and root growth parameters of the produced transplants were greatly improved by planting in either compost + sand (1 : 2, v/v) or olive pomace + sand (1 : 1or 1:2, v/v) media regardless of time of planting (either in spring or in autumn), but the mastery in both seasons was for planting in compost + sand (1 : 2, v/v) medium that recorded the highest means in most characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace and sand at 1:1 improved vegetative and root growth.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Treatment
olive pomace + sand (1 : 1or 1:2, v/v)e0
Outcome
vegetative and root growth parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“most vegetative and root growth parameters of the produced transplants were greatly improved by planting in either compost + sand (1 : 2, v/v) or olive pomace + sand (1 : 1or 1:2, v/v) media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most treatments reduced leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
various treatmentse0
Outcome
content of total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“The content of total chlorophyll in the leaves was significantly decreased in response to various treatments applied in such study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1921–2051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost amended sand at 2:1 or 3:1 had chlorophyll values near the control in the first season.

Taxon
OLIVEOlea europaeat0
Treatment
sand amended with compost at 2: 1 or 3: 1, v/ve0
Outcome
valuese0
Qualifier
1st seasone0
Comparator
control mediae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“planting in sand amended with compost at 2: 1 or 3: 1, v/v which gave values greatly near to those registered by control media in the only 1st season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2063–2212 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend compost and sand at 1:2 for transplanting rooted olive cuttings throughout the year.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Material
Aggezie0
Outcome
transplant the rooted cuttings of olive cv. Aggezi in compost + sand (1 : 2, v/v) medium at any period of the yeare0
Comparator
peatmoss + sande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROOTED OLIVE (Olea europea L. CV. Aggezi) CUTTINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“it can be recommended to transplant the rooted cuttings of olive cv. Aggezi in compost + sand (1 : 2, v/v) medium at any period of the year as a more suitable and cheaper medium than peatmoss + sand one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2221–2423 · show in text ↑

growing medium · survival · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

in vitro · survival · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

growing medium · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.