Claim · model-written summary
Vanadium produced a more drastic rise in AV Garnet leaf lipid peroxidation than in Agamax.
- Taxon
- Brassica napus
_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60)
Brassica napust0 - Material
- AV Garnete0
- Treatment
- Vanadiume1
- Outcome
- leaf lipid peroxidatione0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- Agamaxe0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“we observed a more drastic increase in leaf lipid peroxidation and leaf cell death (assessed by Evans blue uptake) of AV Garnet when compared to Agamax.”
e1“under control (distilled water) and Vanadium (350 μM NaVO3) treatments”
t0“Brassica napus”
Title
A. Gokul; L.F. Cyster; M. Keyster South African Journal of Botany 2018. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2018.08.001
Other claims from this paper (18)
- Intervention effect Vanadium caused leaf yellowing in AV Garnet.
- Intervention effect Vanadium did not cause leaf yellowing in Agamax.
- Intervention effect Vanadium caused a more severe decrease in AV Garnet leaf dry and fresh weight than in Agamax.
- Intervention effect Vanadium reduced AV Garnet leaf chlorophyll a, b and total content.
- Intervention effect Vanadium had no effect on Agamax leaf chlorophyll content.
- Intervention effect Vanadium increased leaf superoxide content in AV Garnet.
- Intervention effect Vanadium increased leaf superoxide content in Agamax.
- Intervention effect AV Garnet leaves had more superoxide than Agamax leaves under vanadium stress.
- Intervention effect Vanadium produced a more drastic rise in AV Garnet leaf cell death than in Agamax.
- Intervention effect Vanadium inhibited total leaf SOD activity more in AV Garnet than in Agamax.
- Intervention effect Vanadium did not alter leaf MnSOD isoform activity in either cultivar.
- Intervention effect Vanadium did not alter leaf Cu/ZnSOD isoform activity in either cultivar.
- Intervention effect Vanadium upregulated FeSOD 1 and FeSOD 3 activity in Agamax leaves.
- Intervention effect Vanadium decreased FeSOD 1 and FeSOD 3 activity in AV Garnet leaves.
- Intervention effect Vanadium inhibited leaf FeSOD 2 activity in both cultivars.
- Observation Agamax roots contained more vanadium than AV Garnet roots after treatment.
- Observation AV Garnet had higher root-to-leaf vanadium translocation factor than Agamax after treatment.
- Mechanism The authors propose that vanadium tolerance may depend on SOD activity and root immobilization of vanadium.