Claim · model-written summary
Vanadium did not alter leaf Cu/ZnSOD isoform activity in either cultivar.
- Taxon
- Brassica napus
_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60)
Brassica napust0 - Material
- Agamax and AV Garnete0
- Treatment
- Vanadiume0
- Gene
- Cu/ZnSODe0
- Outcome
- leaf Cu/ZnSODe0
- Direction
- did not altere0
- Comparator
- control (distilled water)e1
Not reportedCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Vanadium treatment did not alter the leaf MnSOD as well as leaf Cu/ZnSOD isoforms of both Agamax and AV Garnet.”
e1“under control (distilled water) and Vanadium (350 μM NaVO3) treatments”
t0“Brassica napus”
Title
A. Gokul; L.F. Cyster; M. Keyster South African Journal of Botany 2018. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2018.08.001
Other claims from this paper (18)
- Intervention effect Vanadium caused leaf yellowing in AV Garnet.
- Intervention effect Vanadium did not cause leaf yellowing in Agamax.
- Intervention effect Vanadium caused a more severe decrease in AV Garnet leaf dry and fresh weight than in Agamax.
- Intervention effect Vanadium reduced AV Garnet leaf chlorophyll a, b and total content.
- Intervention effect Vanadium had no effect on Agamax leaf chlorophyll content.
- Intervention effect Vanadium increased leaf superoxide content in AV Garnet.
- Intervention effect Vanadium increased leaf superoxide content in Agamax.
- Intervention effect AV Garnet leaves had more superoxide than Agamax leaves under vanadium stress.
- Intervention effect Vanadium produced a more drastic rise in AV Garnet leaf lipid peroxidation than in Agamax.
- Intervention effect Vanadium produced a more drastic rise in AV Garnet leaf cell death than in Agamax.
- Intervention effect Vanadium inhibited total leaf SOD activity more in AV Garnet than in Agamax.
- Intervention effect Vanadium did not alter leaf MnSOD isoform activity in either cultivar.
- Intervention effect Vanadium upregulated FeSOD 1 and FeSOD 3 activity in Agamax leaves.
- Intervention effect Vanadium decreased FeSOD 1 and FeSOD 3 activity in AV Garnet leaves.
- Intervention effect Vanadium inhibited leaf FeSOD 2 activity in both cultivars.
- Observation Agamax roots contained more vanadium than AV Garnet roots after treatment.
- Observation AV Garnet had higher root-to-leaf vanadium translocation factor than Agamax after treatment.
- Mechanism The authors propose that vanadium tolerance may depend on SOD activity and root immobilization of vanadium.