Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar CaCl gave higher cowpea yield attributes and yields than KNO.

A claim from Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization along with foliar spray of calcium chloride and potassium nitrate on performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) + baby corn (Zea mays) intercropping systems · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar CaCl gave higher cowpea yield attributes and yields than KNO.

Treatment
foliar spray of 0.5% of CaCle0
Outcome
yield attributes and yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
1% KNOe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield attributes and yields of both crops were significantly higher with the foliar spray of 0.5% of CaCl over 1% KNO .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1404
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–277

Title

Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization along with foliar spray of calcium chloride and potassium nitrate on performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) + baby corn (Zea mays) intercropping systems

ANJU BIJARNIA; J.P. TETARWAL; BALDEV RAM; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v66i3.2859

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-0789972a65e63cd8a6eeeddd8a0f5881464c9ae93bd87658ea15bd1b0023191e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

117 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.