Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization along with foliar spray of calcium chloride and potassium nitrate on performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) + baby corn (Zea mays) intercropping systems

ANJU BIJARNIA; J.P. TETARWAL; BALDEV RAM; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An field experiment was carried out during 2019 and 2020 at Agriculture Research Station, Ummedganj, Kota, Rajasthan, to study the effect of NP fertilization and foliar spray of stress-mitigating chemicals on yield attributes and yields of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] and baby corn (Zea mays L.) in cowpea and baby corn crop- ping system. The experiment was laid out in split split-plot design with 5 intercropping systems, viz. sole cowpea, sole baby corn, cowpea + baby corn (2 : 1), cowpea + baby corn (3 : 1) and cowpea + baby corn (4 : 1) in main plot, 3 fertility levels (100, 125 and 150% recommended dose of fertilizer) in subplot and 2 stress-mitigating chemi- cals (0.5% CaCl and 1% KNO at flowering and pod development stages) in sub-subplot and replicated 4 times. 2 3 Data revealed that, 2 : 1 row ratio of cowpea and baby corn significantly increased the yield attributes of cowpea as well as baby corn over all the remaining row ratios and sole crops. Yields of both crops were significantly higher under their sole cropping and yield decreased significantly in intercropping due to reduction in plant population. In the subplot, all yield attributes and yields of both crops were higher with the fertility level of 150% over lower levels (100% and 125%). The yield attributes and yields of both crops were significantly higher with the foliar spray of 0.5% of CaCl over 1% KNO . 2 3

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2:1 row ratio increased cowpea yield attributes over other ratios and sole crops.

Treatment
2 : 1 row ratio of cowpea and baby corne0
Outcome
yield attributes of cowpeae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
all the remaining row ratios and sole cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2 : 1 row ratio of cowpea and baby corn significantly increased the yield attributes of cowpea as well as baby corn over all the remaining row ratios and sole crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2:1 row ratio increased baby corn yield attributes over other ratios and sole crops.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
2 : 1 row ratio of cowpea and baby corne0
Outcome
yield attributes of cowpea as well as baby corne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
all the remaining row ratios and sole cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“2 : 1 row ratio of cowpea and baby corn significantly increased the yield attributes of cowpea as well as baby corn over all the remaining row ratios and sole crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole cropping gave higher cowpea yield than intercropping.

Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
Yields of both cropse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of both crops were significantly higher under their sole cropping and yield decreased significantly in intercropping due to reduction in plant population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole cropping gave higher baby corn yield than intercropping.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
Yields of both cropse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercroppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of both crops were significantly higher under their sole cropping and yield decreased significantly in intercropping due to reduction in plant population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–305 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced plant population was cited as the cause of lower intercropping yield.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
reduction in plant populatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield decreased significantly in intercropping due to reduction in plant population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1137 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 150% fertilizer, cowpea yield attributes and yield exceeded lower levels.

Treatment
fertility level of 150%e0
Outcome
yield attributes and yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
lower levels (100% and 125%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all yield attributes and yields of both crops were higher with the fertility level of 150% over lower levels (100% and 125%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1279 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 150% fertilizer, baby corn yield attributes and yield exceeded lower levels.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
fertility level of 150%e0
Outcome
yield attributes and yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
lower levels (100% and 125%)e0

Verbatim

e0

“all yield attributes and yields of both crops were higher with the fertility level of 150% over lower levels (100% and 125%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1279 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar CaCl gave higher cowpea yield attributes and yields than KNO.

Treatment
foliar spray of 0.5% of CaCle0
Outcome
yield attributes and yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
1% KNOe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield attributes and yields of both crops were significantly higher with the foliar spray of 0.5% of CaCl over 1% KNO .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1404 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar CaCl gave higher baby corn yield attributes and yields than KNO.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
foliar spray of 0.5% of CaCle0
Outcome
yield attributes and yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
1% KNOe0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield attributes and yields of both crops were significantly higher with the foliar spray of 0.5% of CaCl over 1% KNO .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1404 · show in text ↑
e1

“baby corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–305 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.