Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sole cowpea gave a significantly higher green fodder yield than the various intercropping systems.

A claim from Studies on the Effect of Crop Geometry and Nutrient Management on Productivity and Economics of Baby Corn and Cowpea (Fodder) Intercropping System · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole cowpea gave a significantly higher green fodder yield than the various intercropping systems.

Treatment
sole crop of baby corn and cowpeae1
Outcome
green fodder yielde1
Direction
Highere1
Comparator
various intercropping systemse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Higher number of corns ha-1, baby corn yield and green fodder yield of baby corn and cowpea were found in sole crop of baby corn and cowpea, respectively. This was significantly higher than various intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–922

Title

Studies on the Effect of Crop Geometry and Nutrient Management on Productivity and Economics of Baby Corn and Cowpea (Fodder) Intercropping System

A. K. Barik; M. Karmakar; S. K. Ghorai; et al. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2016. doi:10.23910/ijbsm/2016.7.2.1559

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-97ccd305637d260c159f58157dcb23722d5167f5413ecda49e177b7e8ee020bb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.