Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sole baby corn gave the highest gross return, net return and return per rupee invested, significantly higher than all other intercropping combinations.

A claim from Studies on the Effect of Crop Geometry and Nutrient Management on Productivity and Economics of Baby Corn and Cowpea (Fodder) Intercropping System · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole baby corn gave the highest gross return, net return and return per rupee invested, significantly higher than all other intercropping combinations.

Taxon
baby corne4
Treatment
sole crop of baby corne4
Outcome
gross return, net return and return rupee-1 investmente4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
all other intercropping combinationse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e4

“The highest gross return, net return and return rupee-1 investment was achieved in sole crop of baby corn which was significantly higher than all other intercropping combinations as well as sole crop of Cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1485

Title

Studies on the Effect of Crop Geometry and Nutrient Management on Productivity and Economics of Baby Corn and Cowpea (Fodder) Intercropping System

A. K. Barik; M. Karmakar; S. K. Ghorai; et al. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2016. doi:10.23910/ijbsm/2016.7.2.1559

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e856e6439e0c3a9896d388bd0a45c5100f27798084e4a9e4b788f6599ac98871 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this claim · 85 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Increased corn density had no net yield benefit.

    Effect of Planting Patterns and Inter-row Cultivation on Competition Between Corn (Zea mays) and Late Emerging Weeds · 1996

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Planting corn in narrow rows did not increase grain yield.

    Integrated Weed Management Using Narrow Corn Row Spacing, Herbicides, and Cultivation · 1998

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Planting on 13 July reduced grain yield by 42% in Azir in 2006.

    Planting Date and Cultivar Effects on Grain Yield in Dryland Corn Production · 2009

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Yellow mustard seeded over the corn row at 530 seeds m-2 reduced average corn grain yield by 4% compared with corn in monoculture.

    Simulation of Spring-Seeded Smother Plants for Weed Control in Corn (Zea mays) · 1994 · compared with corn grown in monoculture

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Colonial bentgrass as living mulch significantly reduced sweet corn and cabbage yields.

    Screening of Turfgrasses and Clovers for Use as Living Mulches in Sweet Corn and Cabbage · 1983

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Milk production did not differ between corn silage hybrids in the third trial.

    Corn Silage Hybrid Effects on Intake, Digestion, and Milk Production by Dairy Cows · 2000

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Intersowing cover crops into standing corn did not affect corn yield in the three experiments.

    Establishment and Impact of Cover Crops Intersown into Corn · 2016 · compared with no‐cover‐crop treatment

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Delayed corn planting dates had little impact on corn yield in disk-killed or roll-killed treatments.

    Reduced‐Tillage Organic Corn Production in a Hairy Vetch Cover Crop · 2012

    Opposite direction

283 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this claim · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    When intercropped with beans, the yields of organic and conventional systems were similar.

    Productivity, profitability and partial nutrient balance in maize-based conventional and organic farming systems in Kenya · 2016

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Seeding intercrops when corn was 0.15 to 0.30 m high did not change first-year corn grain yield.

    Contributions of Ground Cover, Dry Matter, and Nitrogen from Intercrops and Cover Crops in a Corn Polyculture System1 · 1987

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    At 120 kg N ha−1, legume intercrops reduced maize yields by 18 to 31%.

    Relay‐Intercropping of Sunnhemp and Cowpea into a Smallholder Maize System in Zimbabwe · 2000

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Intercropping did not significantly affect maize grain yield in 2007.

    Effect of Intercropping and Crop Arrangement on Yield and Productivity of Late Season Maize/soybean Mixtures in the Humid Environment of South Southern Nigeria · 2012

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Intercropping reduced maize grain yield by 23–70%.

    Yield stability of cassava, maize, soya bean and cowpea intercrops · 2003 · compared with sole crop

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Intercropping maize or sorghum with legumes reduced leaf area indices, fresh weight yield at anthesis and straw yield.

    Effects of Intercropping Maize or Sorghum with Cowpeas, Pigeon Peas or Beans · 1973

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    White lupine intercropping inhibited maize growth and yield.

    Growth and phosphorus uptake of maize cultivated alone, in mixed culture with other crops or after incorporation of their residues · 2003

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    In maize/beans intercrop, maize yield was depressed by 15% compared with sole maize.

    The effect of planting combinations and weeding on the growth and yield of component crops of maize/bean and maize/pumpkin intercrops · 2002 · compared with its sole yield

    Opposite direction

825 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.